September 28, 2006
Now An Anthrax Scare In My Senator’s Office
Gee,
they went after my state senator on 9/11.
Now they are hoaxing my favorite US senator.
An anthrax hoax at Sen. John Cornyn’s office left aides stuck in their offices for about 45 minutes at lunchtime Thursday, after an intern opened an envelope containing a small amount of powder.
Tests quickly determined that it wasn’t dangerous.
“There was a small amount of powder. It was nothing hazardous. Hazmat has given the all clear,†said Capitol police Sgt. Kimberly Schneider. “There was also a note indicating that there was anthrax.â€
“It had gone through our mail system. It had been irradiated,†she said. That procedure was implemented after unsolved attacks on two Senate offices in fall 2001.
False alarms and scares are not uncommon at the Capitol. No one was evacuated, though everyone in the vicinity was asked to remain in place, presumably to avoid the spread of any potential contaminant. Access to part of Mr. Cornyn’s office suite was blocked pending the outcome of the tests.
“One of our interns opened a suspicious envelope. Capitol police responded.
Everyone is working as usual. I’m not evacuated. Sitting at my desk,†said Cornyn press secretary Brian Walsh before the all-clear was issued. “The system for screening mail, since the anthrax, is very vigorous.â€
Such jokes are sick.
Posted by: Greg at
11:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
Now An Anthrax Scare In My SenatorÂ’s Office
Gee,
they went after my state senator on 9/11.
Now they are hoaxing my favorite US senator.
An anthrax hoax at Sen. John CornynÂ’s office left aides stuck in their offices for about 45 minutes at lunchtime Thursday, after an intern opened an envelope containing a small amount of powder.
Tests quickly determined that it wasnÂ’t dangerous.
“There was a small amount of powder. It was nothing hazardous. Hazmat has given the all clear,” said Capitol police Sgt. Kimberly Schneider. “There was also a note indicating that there was anthrax.”
“It had gone through our mail system. It had been irradiated,” she said. That procedure was implemented after unsolved attacks on two Senate offices in fall 2001.
False alarms and scares are not uncommon at the Capitol. No one was evacuated, though everyone in the vicinity was asked to remain in place, presumably to avoid the spread of any potential contaminant. Access to part of Mr. CornynÂ’s office suite was blocked pending the outcome of the tests.
“One of our interns opened a suspicious envelope. Capitol police responded.
Everyone is working as usual. I’m not evacuated. Sitting at my desk,” said Cornyn press secretary Brian Walsh before the all-clear was issued. “The system for screening mail, since the anthrax, is very vigorous.”
Such jokes are sick.
Posted by: Greg at
11:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
September 27, 2006
Terrorist-Backing Muslims Of CAIR Demand Retraction Of Offensive Language
I guess
you cannot speak ill of Muslim terrorists who claim to be engaged in jihad. It isnÂ’t politically correct.
The U.S. Council on Amnerican-Islamic Relations has accused a Michigan congressman of using 'polarizing' language.
CAIR's Michigan chapter said Tuesday its representatives wanted to meet with Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-MI, over what it called his use of "polarizing language" on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.
CAIR said that McCotter had used the term "jihadist-fascist" while discussing U.S. policy in Iraq in a House debate. CAIR quoted the congressman as saying, "The crushing weight of putting Iraq back into the terrorist and the jihadist-fascist camp will have enormous ramifications. . ."
"Representative McCotter should use his time on the House floor to foster dialogue and mutual understanding, not to introduce hot-button terms that will further damage our nation's image in the Islamic world," said CAIR's Michigan Executive Director Dawud Walid.
Walid said President George W. Bush had stopped using the term "Islamic fascist" after Muslims in America and around the world had protested that it was ill-defined and counterproductive in persuading people in the global conflict against terror.
Fine – you don’t like the term “jihadi-fascist? How about some other suggestions?
“Islamo-Nazis.”
“Homicidal camel-jockeys”
“Murderous pig-raping followers of the false prophet Muhammad.”
Or maybe just “Typical Muslims” -- because you come out in their defense at every opportunity.
Posted by: Greg at
12:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
1
We will stay with the narrow ramifications of the instance cited here by the siteowner, since we cannot vouch that CAIR has never defended the indefensible.
Iraq under Hussein was not in the terrorist camp. Baathism is a nationalist philosophy that emphasizes Islam but, founded by a Christian Arab, also protects Christians much better than a pro-Iranian soft theocracy Bush has installed.
As for Saddam's modest gifts to Palestinian families after the fact of their homes being bulldozed by Israelis in the "guilt by association" punishment foreign to American ethics,this is hardly funding terrorism.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 29 04:35:25 2006 (7GYBH)
2
Actually, Israel's policy of bulldozing the homes of those engaged in such attacks dates back to the time of the British Mandate, KKKen, and was adopted to punish Jewish freedom fighters who dared stand up for their people in the wake of the Holocaust. You anti-Semites were all for it when the victims were Jews.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Sep 29 10:16:08 2006 (Wl5fp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Time To Neuter the Terrorstinian Anarchy?
If this is the sentiment at work in the West Bank and Gaza, it might be time to admit that the Israeli policy of permitting Palestinian self-rule is a favor, and that the expulsion of Palestinian Arabs (a policy implemented by virtually every Arab country towards their Jews in 194
is the only moral and rational option.
Following the recent Israeli-Hizballah war in Lebanon, a majority of Palestinians say they should follow Hizballah's example and launch rockets into Israeli cities, a new poll showed.
Hizballah launched more than 4,000 rockets into Israel killing dozens of Israelis and causing extensive damage throughout northern Israel during the 34-day war in July and August.
According to the results of a survey conducted by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), 63 percent of the Palestinians surveyed agreed that they should emulate Hizballah's methods by launching rockets at Israeli cities while 35 percent of Palestinians disagreed.
A majority of Palestinians also supported Hizballah in July 2000 following Israel's unilateral troop withdrawal from southern Lebanon. At the time, Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah boasted that his group had done what no Arab nation in the last 50 years had done: defeat Israel. He encouraged the Palestinians to follow in his footsteps.
Five months after Israel's troop withdrawal from Lebanon, the Palestinians launched their intifadah uprising, which has turned into a five-year terror campaign targeting Israeli cities as well as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The new poll showed that about 57 percent of Palestinians support the idea of using suicide bombings and shooting attacks against Israelis.
There may, however, be a glimmer of hope.
But at the same time, about three-quarters of Palestinians supported the call for an Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire, and 74 percent said they believe that Palestinians cannot depend on violent actions only but must reach a political agreement with Israel.
So a majority wants a political settlement with Israel – but there remains the problem that many of them want it achieved through terror attacks on the Jewish state. That is not acceptable. It also will not succeed.
Posted by: Greg at
12:42 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Every Palestinian who has deeds to property vacated by expulsion in 1948 and who wishes to return to his or her homeland, should be permitted return, after which a general plebiscite should be held deciding what form of government should reside over the entire area in question.
If the majority favor Zionism, so be it. If a democracy with equal rights for all, so be it.
This is the only possible peaceful denoument of the conflict but the siteowner theoretically prefers ethnic cleansing, given a choice.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 29 04:41:52 2006 (7GYBH)
2
KKKen, you have it backwards -- the Arabs expelled the Jews, not the other way around.
The Jews of Israel responded by compensateing their dispossessed bretheren and giving them citizenship.
On the other hand, the Arabs who voluntarily left their homes were ignored by their Arab bretheren and allowed to rot in refugee camps for generations.
Let the Arabs care for teh Arabs -- and Israel remain a homeland for the Jews.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Sep 29 10:06:47 2006 (Wl5fp)
3
http://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/EPP/TheAuthor.htm
YOU have it backwards,as the definitive "Encyclopedia of the Palestinian Problem" outlines. Basic primer recommended for
the indoctrinated American.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 29 10:36:43 2006 (7GYBH)
4
Listen, KKKen -- you are the same guy who denies the Final Solution, so your track record on any issue related to the Jews is suspect. Indeed, you have called for genocide against the "kikes" (a word you are not willing to use here, but do in emails) more than once. You have also recommended Holocaust denial literature as the "definitive" primer for understanding the Holocaust.
The source you cite is by one more Terrorstinian official. it is no more worthy of consideration than the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (which I suspect you believe to be true, despite its having been documented to be a forgery).
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Sep 29 12:07:50 2006 (Wl5fp)
5
It's just like you to bear false witness against as many Christians you claim to call "fellows' as you can when they take your beloved Israel off the pedastal.
I leave it to any of the inquisitive and objective to read this Palestinian CHRISTIAN'S tome and decide whether an intellect of his quality deserves the "terrorsitan" appellation
And of course you can't produce one example of myself calling for "genocide" against any group in either private or public writing. However to fervid "Jews must rebuild the Temple for Jesus to come again" cultists like you, calling for a peaceful plebiscite is tantamount to calling for genocide.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 30 07:16:04 2006 (5j8Ij)
6
KKKen -- you have repeatedly called for the Jews to be removed from Israel. As that will not happen without your beloved Islamist jihadis of Hezbollah and Hamas (who you call secret warriors for Christ) spilling the blood of every man, woman, and child in the Jewish state.
But then again, you are a Klan-supporting, Holocaust-denying, Christian Identity-worshipping, Neo-Nazi skinhead wannabe who repeatedly sent me anti-Semitic material until i insisted you stop writing me. You are simply pathetic.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 30 14:35:21 2006 (3Gquf)
7
I have always deferred to the Palestinians to decide these matters, as I am not an interventionist Wilsonian liberal like the neocons. Thus I would never have called for the "Jews to be removed from Israel."
It was always PLO policy, in fact, that Jews who had immediate family living in Palestine in the pre-1948 era and were not part of the influx after, could be allowed to remain in a non-Zionist state.
And of course your repeated Christian Identity label conflicts with neo-Nazi, in turn conflicting with Klan ideology, and proves you love to heap on epithets which worked in pre-1990 America but do so no longer, the accuser being immediately suspect of America-endangering "Israel-first" politics.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Oct 2 10:32:48 2006 (DZbll)
8
Gee, KKKen -- sounds remarkably similar to what Hitler implemented in Germany in the 1930s. That was how he started dealing with the "Jewish Question" -- by deporting all the foreign Jews before killing the native ones.
Of course, he then went after the neighboring countries and killed their Jews as well -- toting up 6 million along with anothe 6 million Gentiles.
And I connect you with all three groups because you have sent me literature from individuals who are part of each of them, praising them for their ideology.
By the way -- if you think I am an uncritical supporter of Israel who places the needs of that nation above those of the US, think again (or in your case, think a first time) -- go to the search box above and Google the name Johathan Pollard.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Oct 2 11:08:30 2006 (cZkcw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 26, 2006
Blame Israel First
YouÂ’ve just got to love the rationalization for why
the victim of aggression is the bad actor.
After 33 days of blowing up all major roads, bridges and airports in southern Lebanon, Israeli soldier Gil Ovadia's commander told his troops to be prepared to come back soon and fight again.
The Israeli public still criticizes Olmert's government for not doing enough damage. Uri Avnery, a Jewish writer stated, "If one wants to become prime minister of Israel, one has to walk over dead bodies."
Last month, Rabbi Dov Lior of the Yesha Council of Rabbis announced, "There are no innocent parties in a time of war. Rather, one must battle a bellicose city until it is captured." It gives us a clear picture of who is the warmonger here.
Certainly this mind set of disregarding the lives and property of one's neighbors is Israel's real problem and not that of the people of Lebanon and Palestine.
"We did not think that there was a 1 percent chance that the capturing would lead to a war of this scale and magnitude," admitted Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah.
So what we have here is an argument that when Israel faces attack from terrorists across international borders, it may not respond to the violation of international law and is immoral if it does so. Lebanon’s failure to control its territory, its borders, and the terrorists that operate within it (and which are part of its government) is irrelevant to this apologist for terrorism. All that matters is that Israel responded to the provocations of Hezbollah – the Party of (false) God.
Which leads us, of course, to this astounding assertion.
What makes a nation successful is not its power to kill and bring misery to the world, but its ability to bring comfort to our fellow human beings. Israel should realize its aggression and arrogance only fuel more hate, isolation and resistance. People won't forget that they are living under military occupation or that they have been living in refugee camps for six decades.
After six decades of failing to engage in civil discourse with its neighbors, it's time for Israelis to think of a new strategy for survival.
If the Israelis want to live in that neighborhood in peace and security, they better humble themselves and make some courageous changes in the Zionist political culture.
For six decades, Israel has sought peace with its neighbors. It has been the victim of repeated acts of aggression by those neighbors during that time. Israel is willing to negotiate with those who seek peace, but will defend itself vigorously from those who seek its destruction and those who provide them save haven. It is not Israel that needs to change, but rather it is the Arab/Muslim mindset that demands more Jewish blood be spilled.
Oh, yes, and one other thing, commented upon by Golda Meir decades ago – for the enemies of Israel to decide they love their children more than they hate the Jews.
Posted by: Greg at
08:59 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 507 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Israel IS a terror state in occupation of the West Bank and Samaria for a generation after being ordered off it by UN resolutions.
Antiwar.com administrator Justin Raimondo, gave a small scale analogy for those who excuse Israeli barbarism in Lebanon. The same people would believe if they had their wallet taken while standing at the front of a crowded bus, they would have a right to trample violently on everyone in their path while chasing the thief to the back of the bus, breaking bones or worse along the way.
Extrapolate to actual lives lost in Lebanon due to wanton Zionist overraction, and you get the comparison.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Sep 27 11:32:09 2006 (DZbll)
2
The UN, having failed to enforce its initial resolutions regarding the Holy Land, has no moral authority to act in the region today.
And the Arabs, having rejected the authority of the UN to determine the future of the region, have no moral basis for claiming that Israel must obey the UN today.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Sep 27 12:46:21 2006 (jYqte)
3
Oh, and by the way, the only problem with the ccasualty count in Lebanon is that it was significantly less than 50% of what it needed to be to break the back of Hiz-jizzbag, the Party of the False God.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Sep 27 12:47:45 2006 (jYqte)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 18, 2006
Thank you Greg! And now for my first trick.
The Pope must die, says Muslim
A notorious Muslim extremist told a demonstration in London yesterday that the Pope should face execution.
Anjem Choudary said those who insulted Islam would be "subject to capital punishment".
His remarks came during a protest outside Westminster Cathedral on a day that worldwide anger among Muslim hardliners towards Pope Benedict XVI appeared to deepen.
The pontiff yesterday apologised for causing offence during a lecture last week. Quoting a medieval emperor, his words were taken to mean that he called the prophet Mohammed "evil and inhuman".
He insisted he was "deeply sorry" but his humbling words did not go far enough to silence all his critics or quell the violence and anger he has triggered.
A nun was shot dead in Somalia by Islamic gunmen and churches came under attack in Palestine.
Choudary's appeal for the death of Pope Benedict was the second time he has been linked with apparent incitement to murder within a year.
The 39-year-old lawyer organised
demonstrations against the publication of cartoons of Mohammed in February in Denmark. Protesters carried placards declaring "Behead Those Who Insult Islam".
Yesterday he said: "The Muslims take their religion very seriously and non-Muslims must appreciate that and that must also understand that there may be serious consequences if you insult Islam and the prophet.
"Whoever insults the message of Mohammed is going to be subject to capital punishment."
He added: "I am here have a peaceful demonstration. But there may be people in Italy or other parts of the world who would carry that out.
"I think that warning needs to be understood by all people who want to insult Islam and want to insult the prophet of Islam."
As well as placards attacking the Pope such as "Pope go to Hell", his followers outside the country's principal Roman Catholic church also waved slogans aimed at offending the sentiments of Christians such as "Jesus is the slave of Allah".
A Scotland Yard spokesman said of his comments: "We have had no complaints about this. There were around 100 people at the demonstration. It passed off peacefully and there were no arrests."
Larger Islamic groups in Britain said they accepted the Pope's apology. Inayat Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of Britain said: "The Vatican has moved quickly to deal with the hurt and we accept that.
"It was something that should never have happened - words of that nature were always likely to cause dismay - and we believe some of the Pope's advisers may have been at fault over his speech."
Yesterday's sermon by the Pope was the first time a pontiff has publicly said sorry.
He said he regretted Muslim reaction to his speech and stressed that the quotation did not reflect his personal opinion. Anger and violence - including attacks on seven churches in the West Bank and Gaza - have characterised one of the biggest international crises involving the Vatican in decades.
The Pope appeared determined to move quickly to try to defuse the anger but the fury of many radicals was unabated last night and there were fears for his safety.
Iraqi jihadists issued a video of a scimitar slicing a cross in two, intercut with images of Benedict and the burning Twin Towers.
The website run in the name of the Mujahedeen Army, used by extremist groups who have claimed responsibility for attacks in Iraq, was addressed to "You dog of Rome" and threatened to "shake your thrones and break your crosses in your home".
In a reference to suicide bombing, it said: "We swear to God to send you people who adore death as much as you adore life."
The threat of violence against Catholics and Christians was emphasised by the murder of an Italian nun in Somalia. Sister Leonella, 66, was shot as she walked from the children's hospital where she worked to her house in Mogadishu, a city recently taken over by an Islamic government.
A Vatican spokesman said he feared her death was "the fruit of violence and irrationality arising from the current situation".
Father Frederico Lombardi said he hoped it was an isolated event. "We are worried about this wave of hatred and hope it doesn't have any grave consequences for the Church around the world," he said.
The murder suggested that extremists are determined to use the Pope's embarrassment as an excuse for violence.
In Turkey, state minister Mehmet Aydin said the Pope seemed to be saying he was sorry for the outrage but not necessarily for his remarks.
"You either have to say this, 'I'm sorry' in a proper way or not say it at all," he told reporters in Istanbul.
There were fierce denunciations of the pontiff from Iran. The English-language Tehran Times called his lecture in Bavaria last week "code words for a new crusade".
The powerful cleric Ahmad Khatami told theological students in the holy city of Qom: The "Pope should fall on his knees in front of a senior Muslim cleric and try to understand Islam."
But the Turkish government signalled it was content and that the Pope's visit to the country in November can go ahead.
In his sermon yesterday at the Papal summer residence of Castel Gandolfo outside Rome, Benedict spoke amid strengthened security.
He said: "I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims.
"These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not in any way express my personal thought. I hope this serves to appease hearts and to clarify the true meaning of my address."
No other Pope is thought to have made such an apology.
A faith that has millions and millions of followers, that decrees that no one who believes as they do, should be killed, as a matter of fact. And that for all intensive purposes (those "radical/extremist followers) are "not" dressed down publically, for fear that "they" (infidels) will be targeted?
We infidels need to understand that as far as these extremists are concerned, we have been, and always shall be targeted. And apologizing, appeasing and being civilized dissagree-ers with the concepts and culture of islam will get us nowhere to any peace or reduced threat, ever.
What we are doing now is not so much a "war on terror", that is just the surface of the concept.
Once we study and apply the lessons we can learn from the basic "old school" of the conflict between Isaac and Ishmael (I think thats right, if I recall correctly), I believe that will be half the battle.
Posted by: Boyo at
09:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1129 words, total size 7 kb.
1
The Pope needs to be even handed in criticizing Zionist and Islamic aggressions. As a European it is entirely possible he should address the Islamic problem extant there with greater attention than he does the Israeli oppression of Palestinians and the sins of the Zionist Lobby in America which controls Congress and does Israel's bidding.
Yet if he fails to address this latter adequately, he has no business complaining about the former problem and indeed will be adding to it.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Tue Sep 19 07:46:01 2006 (DZbll)
2
Ah, yes -- its all about the JOOOOOOOOOS.
After all, it is the JOOOOOOOS doing suicide bombings and beheadings. It is the JOOOOOOOOs murdering nuns by shooting them in the back. It is teh JOOOOOOOOOS who hav conducted jihad against Christian civilization since the sixth century.
Oh, my mistake -- those are all actions by your buddies the Muslims, Ken.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Sep 19 09:28:30 2006 (vNPpq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 17, 2006
Islamic Rage Meter -- Condition Red
But then again, isn't it always?
H/T WuzzaDem & Michelle Malkin
* * *
Also, Michelle Malkin has done a great job of keeping track of Muslim barbarism in response to the Pope's use of a 700 year old quote. Churches have been bombed and burned. A nun has been murdered by Islamists. A priest has been kidnapped. All by this supposedly peaceful religion that allegedly just wants respect.
And then you get this pack of barbarians in London, courtesy of Joee Blogs - A Catholic Londoner.
Holy Mass on a Sunday is the very source and summit of the Catholic week, so my family decided this Sunday to make the trip to Westminster Cathedral together. As we came out about 100 Islamists were chanting slogans such as "Pope Benedict go to Hell" "Pope Benedict you will pay, the Muja Hadeen are coming your way" "Pope Benedict watch your back" and other hateful things.
Below are photos from the demonstration, with my personal reaction to the signs.
Before Islam conquers Rome, Mecca and Medina will glow in the dark!
Wrong, bucko! Jesus is the Son of the One True God, and that sure ain't Allah.
Trinity of Evil? Do I detect a bit of blasphemy against Christian belief?
Maybe the time has come to give you that Crusade you keep bitchin' about!
And let me clarify something for those who protested at Westminster and any Muslim who shares their sentiments: drop to your knees and pray to your false god that no harm comes to Pope Benedict XVI, for if he is harmed it will be Muslims who need to watch their backs.
PBUH
Place Bacon Upon Him
Posted by: Greg at
04:19 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 3 kb.
1
First of all, those nuts who are waving placards in London-- they are a small (500-700 people) but well-known group who have been banned from British mosques which actually do represent Britain's 2 million Muslims. If they're thrown in prison, well, that's fine with me.
----------------------------------------------
We cannot afford to maintain these ancient prejudices against Islam
The Pope's remarks were dangerous, and will convince many more Muslims that the west is incurably Islamophobic
Karen Armstrong
In the 12th century, Peter the Venerable, Abbot of Cluny, initiated a dialogue with the Islamic world. "I approach you not with arms, but with words," he wrote to the Muslims whom he imagined reading his book, "not with force, but with reason, not with hatred, but with love." Yet his treatise was entitled Summary of the Whole Heresy of the Diabolical Sect of the Saracens and segued repeatedly into spluttering intransigence. Words failed Peter when he contemplated the "bestial cruelty" of Islam, which, he claimed, had established itself by the sword. Was Muhammad a true prophet? "I shall be worse than a donkey if I agree," he expostulated, "worse than cattle if I assent!"
Peter was writing at the time of the Crusades. Even when Christians were trying to be fair, their entrenched loathing of Islam made it impossible for them to approach it objectively. For Peter, Islam was so self-evidently evil that it did not seem to occur to him that the Muslims he approached with such "love" might be offended by his remarks. This medieval cast of mind is still alive and well.
Last week, Pope Benedict XVI quoted, without qualification and with apparent approval, the words of the 14th-century Byzantine emperor Manuel II: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." The Vatican seemed bemused by the Muslim outrage occasioned by the Pope's words, claiming that the Holy Father had simply intended "to cultivate an attitude of respect and dialogue toward the other religions and cultures, and obviously also towards Islam".
But the Pope's good intentions seem far from obvious. Hatred of Islam is so ubiquitous and so deeply rooted in western culture that it brings together people who are usually at daggers drawn. Neither the Danish cartoonists, who published the offensive caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad last February, nor the Christian fundamentalists who have called him a paedophile and a terrorist, would ordinarily make common cause with the Pope; yet on the subject of Islam they are in full agreement.
Our Islamophobia dates back to the time of the Crusades, and is entwined with our chronic anti-semitism. Some of the first Crusaders began their journey to the Holy Land by massacring the Jewish communities along the Rhine valley; the Crusaders ended their campaign in 1099 by slaughtering some 30,000 Muslims and Jews in Jerusalem. It is always difficult to forgive people we know we have wronged. Thenceforth Jews and Muslims became the shadow-self of Christendom, the mirror image of everything that we hoped we were not - or feared that we were.
The fearful fantasies created by Europeans at this time endured for centuries and reveal a buried anxiety about Christian identity and behaviour. When the popes called for a Crusade to the Holy Land, Christians often persecuted the local Jewish communities: why march 3,000 miles to Palestine to liberate the tomb of Christ, and leave unscathed the people who had - or so the Crusaders mistakenly assumed - actually killed Jesus. Jews were believed to kill little children and mix their blood with the leavened bread of Passover: this "blood libel" regularly inspired pogroms in Europe, and the image of the Jew as the child slayer laid bare an almost Oedipal terror of the parent faith.
Jesus had told his followers to love their enemies, not to exterminate them. It was when the Christians of Europe were fighting brutal holy wars against Muslims in the Middle East that Islam first became known in the west as the religion of the sword. At this time, when the popes were trying to impose celibacy on the reluctant clergy, Muhammad was portrayed by the scholar monks of Europe as a lecher, and Islam condemned - with ill-concealed envy - as a faith that encouraged Muslims to indulge their basest sexual instincts. At a time when European social order was deeply hierarchical, despite the egalitarian message of the gospel, Islam was condemned for giving too much respect to women and other menials.
In a state of unhealthy denial, Christians were projecting subterranean disquiet about their activities on to the victims of the Crusades, creating fantastic enemies in their own image and likeness. This habit has persisted. The Muslims who have objected so vociferously to the Pope's denigration of Islam have accused him of "hypocrisy", pointing out that the Catholic church is ill-placed to condemn violent jihad when it has itself been guilty of unholy violence in crusades, persecutions and inquisitions and, under Pope Pius XII, tacitly condoned the Nazi Holocaust.
Pope Benedict delivered his controversial speech in Germany the day after the fifth anniversary of September 11. It is difficult to believe that his reference to an inherently violent strain in Islam was entirely accidental. He has, most unfortunately, withdrawn from the interfaith initiatives inaugurated by his predecessor, John Paul II, at a time when they are more desperately needed than ever. Coming on the heels of the Danish cartoon crisis, his remarks were extremely dangerous. They will convince more Muslims that the west is incurably Islamophobic and engaged in a new crusade.
We simply cannot afford this type of bigotry. The trouble is that too many people in the western world unconsciously share this prejudice, convinced that Islam and the Qur'an are addicted to violence. The 9/11 terrorists, who in fact violated essential Islamic principles, have confirmed this deep-rooted western perception and are seen as typical Muslims instead of the deviants they really were.
With disturbing regularity, this medieval conviction surfaces every time there is trouble in the Middle East. Yet until the 20th century, Islam was a far more tolerant and peaceful faith than Christianity. The Qur'an strictly forbids any coercion in religion and regards all rightly guided religion as coming from God; and despite the western belief to the contrary, Muslims did not impose their faith by the sword.
The early conquests in Persia and Byzantium after the Prophet's death were inspired by political rather than religious aspirations. Until the middle of the eighth century, Jews and Christians in the Muslim empire were actively discouraged from conversion to Islam, as, according to Qur'anic teaching, they had received authentic revelations of their own. The extremism and intolerance that have surfaced in the Muslim world in our own day are a response to intractable political problems - oil, Palestine, the occupation of Muslim lands, the prevelance of authoritarian regimes in the Middle East, and the west's perceived "double standards" - and not to an ingrained religious imperative.
But the old myth of Islam as a chronically violent faith persists, and surfaces at the most inappropriate moments. As one of the received ideas of the west, it seems well-nigh impossible to eradicate. Indeed, we may even be strengthening it by falling back into our old habits of projection. As we see the violence - in Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon - for which we bear a measure of responsibility, there is a temptation, perhaps, to blame it all on "Islam". But if we are feeding our prejudice in this way, we do so at our peril.
· Karen Armstrong is the author of Islam: A Short History
Posted by: acrobat at Sun Sep 17 23:17:52 2006 (/zDrV)
2
Right on Target...
Linked you but the trackback would not work unfortunately.
Posted by: Assorted Babble by Suzie at Mon Sep 18 00:33:22 2006 (5IkdQ)
3
P.S. Greg, I added you to my personal blogroll too...(smiling)
Posted by: Assorted Babble by Suzie at Mon Sep 18 00:36:05 2006 (5IkdQ)
4
Acrobat -- I can't help but notice that the Muslim response to mere words (like this spring's response to mere pictures) has proven that the words of the long-dead emperor were essentially correct.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 18 03:41:05 2006 (4nXaP)
5
Oh, and let me point out to you that Anderson lies in her piece -- the Pope did not use the quote with approval or without qualification. He clearly indicated it was a quote, and used it to discuss not Islam, but the relationship between faith and reason. Based upon that falsehood, i have little respect for her alleged scholarship.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 18 05:46:33 2006 (4nXaP)
6
The Pope also condemned Israel's invasion of Lebanon and was harumphed as an appeaser by the siteowner. This demosntrates the Pope is caught on a minefield. He must criticise Zionist-controlled America's Middle East interventions to retain the high ground in his stands related to Islam, not to mention to be seen as objective by Moslems.
In this latest historical cycle it can be said he failed to at any time condemn America's effective subsidization of Israel's incursion,nor of the Talmud's ethnic chauvinist preachments spurring that incursion on. The Talmud and the Koran must be treated with proportionate vigor or none at all by Benedict.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Sep 18 10:38:37 2006 (7GYBH)
7
Gee, Ken, why don't you go back to calling it what you used to -- the Zionist Occupied Government. You know, the term that you and the rest of the Christian Identity and militia movement fuckwits use.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 18 13:56:08 2006 (XDRjz)
8
Islam is a pissful religon. Piss be Upon Muhammad.
Posted by: Ishit Onislam at Fri Oct 6 07:10:30 2006 (L5LCw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 16, 2006
But It Certainly Isn't A Call For Violence In The Name of Islam!
After all, we are being assured by those Muslims demanding the Pope apologize for a seven century old quote that Islam is a religion of peace, that jihad is simply an internal struggle, and that violence committed in the name of that faith is unIslamic.
What, then, do they say about this?
Israeli Arab Islamic leader Sheikh Raed Salah told a rally in Jerusalem the "Israeli occupation" of the city will soon vanish.
"With fire and blood we shall liberate al-Aqsa," Salah told 50,000 people Friday at the Islamic Movement's 11th annual rally in Umm al-Fahm, a city in Israel's Haifa district, YNetNews reported.
The Al-Aqsa mosque is part of a complex of buildings in Jerusalem known as the Temple Mount to Jews and some Christians.
"Soon Jerusalem will be the capital of the new Muslim caliphate, and the caliph's seat will be there," Salah said. Caliph is the term or title for the Islamic leader of the Ummah, or community of Islam.
"With fire and blood...."
Nah, that certainly can't be viewed as suggesting violence in the name of Islam, can it.
Either this Muslim leader doesn't understand Islam, or those trying to reassure us that Islam is a peaceful religion are liars.
Posted by: Greg at
02:05 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well.. the land of his people is occupied by a foreign army. International law recognizes (a) that East Jerusalem is occupied territory unlawfully held by the Israelis and (b) that people have a right to take up arms and resist occupation of their lands. His rhetoric is blustery, but then again look what comes out of Bush's semi-literate mouth.
The United States Constitution, a fine document, also authorizes this sort of jihad. And don't forget-- many of the Palestinians are Christians. Why you fail to support them in their very American struggle for their property and rights and freedom from occupation, I don't understand.
Posted by: acrobat at Sat Sep 16 19:07:32 2006 (/zDrV)
2
Gee -- they lost their country, just like Manuel II Paleologus and his family did. Why don't they just shut up and accept it, like you seem to think that long-ago Byzantine Emperor should have.
Could it be that you believe in Muslim conquest (with the rest of the world submitting), yet reject the notion of anybody else taking land away from the Muslims?
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 17 01:59:56 2006 (n0vXU)
3
Again, you're inconveniently ignoring the fact that many Palestinian Christians are suffering from Israeli theft and occupation.
You're also forgetting that Muslims adore and respect Jesus, peace and blessings upon him, as the finest of humanity. To the mostly atheistic Zionists, he is nobody important.
You're also forgetting that the current Pope considers the Protestants to "not be proper churches" who are probably destined for the Hellfire.
When earlier conquests took place, it was a change of political leadership-- the Muslim armies were forbidden from attacking women and children; they Christians and others weren't forced off their land-- they were protected. Roger II of Sicily, a minority among Christian leaders, but respected amonst Muslims acted in much the same way. Muslim law, for the most part, looks very favourable upon Christianity. Muslims with Christian parents, for example, are still expected to obey and take care of them respectfully, and it is a clear violation of Islamic law to attack any Christian places of worship. (I would be happy to see the people who firebombed the churches in the West Bank severely punished.) I personally work with one of Pope John Paul II's former advisors on international security; a Knight Commander of one of the Papal orders who has been my mentor for many years, and thanks to him, I can easily recognize that there is beauty within the Christian faith.
If I didn't know any Christians, and your blog was the only exposure I had to Christianity, I would think Christianity to be a bigoted, juvenile, small-minded thing. Think about that for a moment. You have a choice-- you can affirm your fragile ego by continuing to make ugly, juvenile comments about Muslims and thus accomplish nothing except contributing to the enmity in the world, or you can work with Muslims to address the many serious issues -- global warming, nuclear war, consumerism, materialism, the attack on family values -- that threaten us both.
What would Jesus (pbuh) do?
Posted by: acrobat at Sun Sep 17 18:58:58 2006 (/zDrV)
4
Hey -- what you call an illegal occupation is simply a "change of political leadership". Or is such a change only allowed to go one way -- namely in favor of Islam?
You are forgeting that Muslims blaspheme against Jesus by calling him a prophet and denying his divinity -- as such the claim that they "adore and respect" Jesus is mendacious.
And you misrepresent the teachings of the Catholic Church and this pope on Protestant Churches.
Ultimately, I choose to affirm the truth of Christianity and to rejectn the falsehood of Islam. If that makes me "bigoted, juvenile, small-minded" in your eyes, I could care less. And if my rejection of the active, ongoing violence committed in the name of Islam around the world contributes to emnity in the world, I guess I'll just have to live with that. After all, Islam has shown for that it is the enemy of Christians and the West since the seventh century.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 17 22:22:22 2006 (kKeH6)
5
Again, you're betraying the plight of the Palestinian Christians... the Christians of Bethlehem, no less... in favour of largely atheistic people of Jewish origin mindlessly driving women and children off their own land.
The gruesome thing about the illegal occupation-- and it is illegal under international law, which even the US Government officially agrees with -- is that it involves ethnic cleansing. It's not merely a change in political leadership, it involved the forced removal of people from their homes and the theft of their property. I would not support such actions in any case, even if they were done by people acting in the name of Islam. If the indigenous Jews has simply grabbed the levers of power but didn't harm the Palestinians, well, it wouldn't be a big issue really.
You are forgeting that many Christians didn't believe in the divinity of Jesus (pbuh) either. That only became a mainstream "Christian" belief hundreds of years later, after Christianity had been subverted by the Greco-Romans (starting with Paul, who never knew Jesus (pbuh)) who did a great job wiping out the many Christians (including Jesus' own brother, head of the Jerusalem Church) who believed Jesus (pbuh) to be the Messiah, but not Divine. This is an agreed upon fact amongst the academic community. See for example, Hyam Maccoby's "Paul the Mythmaker" (
excerpt here) which demonstrates very clearly how inconsistencies in the Bible itself prove this claim.
And yes, the Catholic Church does reject Protestant churches as inadequate for salvation. This really isn't surprising, because many Protestant churches reject other Protestant churches as being valid, and many Protestants reject Papal authority as a matter of definition. The historical record shows very clearly that the worst enemy of Christians is... other Christians. Not the Muslim world. There are actually many wonderful examples of Christians and Muslims working together throughout the ages, doing the Lord's work.
The problem is that you reduce things to black-and-while, in a simple-minded cowboy fashion. The West would not be what it is today without Islamic influences, though people are unaware of it. I'm 100% Western and 100% Muslim-- but your simplistic worldview can't comprehend this. I offer you an open hand, in the spirit of Jesus, who we both at least respect, but all you can do is offer spite in return. I think that speaks volumes as to who truly represents the teachings of Jesus (pbuh). You can't stand the thought of a friendly, devout Muslim, because it would shatter your stereotypes.
As for being juvenile-- well, pasting in a cartoon with bacon replacing the face is surely juvenile; I'm sure even Pope Benedict would agree that it's not exactly high-minded scholarship that you're offering on this blog. Your "work" would be considered juvenile at any half-decent American junior high school. It boggles the mind that a fully grown man in his 40s would take the time to make such a silly thing.
Anyhow, since your blog isn't worth reading, I'm going to stop here. If you want to continue doing the online equivalent of masturbating for Jesus, well go ahead and do it alone or in a circle jerk with the other warbloggers. But if you wish to contact me in a true and loving spirit, to make the world a better place, you are most welcome to e-mail me-- you have my address.
Posted by: acrobat at Sun Sep 17 23:04:16 2006 (/zDrV)
6
You are right -- the West would not be what it is today wihout the Islamic influences of the Middle ages.
Unfortunately, Islam is stuck there, having contributed nothing of significance to the world since then -- except for terrorism.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 18 03:44:07 2006 (4nXaP)
7
The siteowner purposely forgets the Stern Gang and Irgun Squad initiated terrorism in the Middle East. But since he has sold his political soul to Israel(perhaps the 'Watchers Council 'requires this,the American "political class"certainly does) he will not mention such. And almost all Jews who have contributed to the Western world items of note have been estranged to a substantial degree from traditional organized Talmudism. Let the siteowner fume on, he is on the losing side of current history, as the Jew dominant neocons quagmired Iraq War and Hezbollah's heroic defiance of Israel hints.
The American political class give every sign of needing a severe chastening before it abandons what conservative Mike Scheuer called "Imperial Hubris."
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Sep 18 10:51:59 2006 (7GYBH)
8
Actually, Ken, if you read a little history you will find that Arab terrorism against Jews began shortly after teh Balfour Declaration, as Jews moved to the Holy Land and purchased land to set up kibbutz. They paid the Arab owners fair market value -- and then had to fight for their lives because they refused to live as dhimmi.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 18 14:10:02 2006 (XDRjz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 11, 2006
The Culture Of Arabs/Muslims Is To Blame
I think
the following needs to be widely circulated.
ONE ARAB'S APOLOGY
By EMILIO KARIM DABUL
WELL, here it is, five years late, but here just the same: an apology from an Arab-American for 9/11. No, I didn't help organize the killers or contribute in any way to their terrible cause. However, I was one of millions of Arab-Americans who did the unspeakable on 9/11: nothing.
The only time I raised my voice in protest against these men who killed thousands of innocents in the name of Allah was behind closed doors, among the safety of friends and family. I did at one point write a very vitriolic essay condemning their actions, but fear of becoming another Salman Rushdie kept me from ever trying to publish it.
Well, I'm sick of saying the truth only in private - that Arabs around the world, including Arab-Americans like myself, need to start holding our own culture accountable for the insane, violent actions that our extremists have perpetrated on the world at large.
Yes, our extremists and our culture.
Every single 9/11 hijacker was Arab and a Muslim. The apologists (including President Bush) tried to reassure us that 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam, but was a twisting of a great and noble religion. With all due respect, read the Koran, Mr. President. There's enough there for someone of extreme tendencies to find their way to a global jihad.
There's also enough there for someone of a different mindset to find a path to enlightenment and peace. Still, Rushdie had it right back in 2001: This does have to do with Islam. A Christian who bombs an abortion clinic in the name of God is still a Christian, at least in his interpretation, and saying otherwise doesn't negate the fact that he has spent a goodly amount of time figuring out his version of the one true and right thing to do.
The men who killed 3,000 of our citizens on 9/11 in all likelihood died saying prayers to Allah, and that by itself is one of the most horrific things to me about that day.
And, while my grandparents never waged a jihad, their attitudes toward Jews weren't that much different than Mohammed Atta's. No, they didn't support the Holocaust, but they did believe that Jews were trouble in many different ways, and those sorts of beliefs were passed on to me before I'd ever actually met a Jew.
I'm sorry for that, for ever believing that anything that my grandparents or other relatives had to say about Jews or Israel, for that matter, had any real resemblance to truth. It took me years to realize that I'd been conned into believing the generalizations and stereotypes that millions around the Arab world buy into: that Jews, America and Israel are our main problem.
One look at the average Arab regime should alert us to the fact that the problem, dear Achmed, lies not overseas or next door in Tel Aviv, but in the brutal, corrupt despots that we have bred from country to country in the Mideast, across the span of history. That history and its corresponding economic devastation is the main reason I reside on New York City's West Bank - New Jersey - not the one near Jerusalem. On my worst day, I'm happy about that fact. I'd rather be here than there, and experience the freedom and boundless opportunities that were mostly unknown to so many generations of my family in the Mideast.
For as long as I live, the image of those towers falling, as I watched in horror and disbelief from the corner of 40th and Fifth, will be for me my Pearl Harbor, for in that instant I recognized that not only was our city under attack - so was our freedom.
It still is. And will continue to be for years to come. And the threat is not from within, but from Islamic fascists who desperately want to destroy the freedom and opportunities that millions the world over still seek.
Five years after that awful day, it's time for all Arab-Americans, and Arabs around the world, to protest against Islamic fascism, to raise our voices - and, where necessary, our arms - against these tyrants until their plague of terror has been driven from the face of the earth forever.
Amen.
Posted by: Greg at
10:23 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 741 words, total size 4 kb.
1
So you like self-hating Arab-Americans who absolve anti-Arab, anti-Islamic foreign policies of the US government for the past fifty-five years. Predictable.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Tue Sep 12 07:43:46 2006 (DZbll)
2
Let's accept your argument for a moment.
Explain the preceeding 13 centuries of jihad against the Christian world.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Sep 12 13:00:13 2006 (AukbA)
3
The author lives in America.America has never had an ethically defensible quarrel with the Islamic world as contrasted with Europe,which has. The author finds no fault in current American Coca-Cola least-common denominator "culture" with an adjunct markedly pro-Israel foreign policy. He criticises Moslem
heritage and culture, comparing it unfavorably with contemporary decadent post-Christian America
even though America has conducted an anti-Islamic foreign policy for generations. He finds no problem in Zionist occupation of Palestine and US support of it.
His remarks would be more fitting were he a European of Arab ancestry.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Sep 13 06:57:46 2006 (DZbll)
4
In other words, you cannot explain the previous 13 cenuries of jihad against the Christian world, starting with the Christians of Arabia, Syria, and the Holy Land, and continuing through North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, Anatolia, Greece, etc...
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Sep 13 09:01:46 2006 (PTsJ5)
5
Sound and fury signifying nothing. You wouldn't support an effective defender of European interests vis a vis Islam if you were a Frenchman. (eg Le Pen) Or an Italian (Mussolini's National Alliance). Or an Austrian (Haider's Freedom Party)
or a Brit (British National Party.)
And they are on the front lines,not America.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Thu Sep 14 08:37:19 2006 (EPkr9)
6
There you go again, Ken, praising the Fascists (literally, in the case of Mussolini). They differe from the jihadis only in terms of religion, not ideology or perversion.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Sep 14 12:01:57 2006 (A0XQ9)
7
Rhymes with Right:
Two links you will enjoy thoroughly:
1)
Turning Muslim in Texas
A British documentary about conservative, white Texans converting to Islam:
2)
British and Muslim?
An article by University of Cambridge professor Tim Winter, a convert to Islam. As a history teacher, you'll find this quite illuminating!
Have a lovely weekend, my good friend!
Posted by: acrobat at Thu Sep 14 14:45:19 2006 (/zDrV)
8
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060925&s=trb092506
the siteowner does not even use Islamo-fascist
(an invention of Israel-loving neocons) correctly. the WOT so called is a war to preserve the plutocrats' American-Israeli Empire and has nothing to do with defending the average American's interests.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 15 06:18:03 2006 (DZbll)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Anthrax Threat At State Senator's Office
Just down the road from here, in
my state senator's local office.
A white, powdery substance found in an envelope that came in the mail to state Sen. Mike Jackson's League City office was found to be a sugar derivative by federal and local investigators, who immediately responded to what they presumed to be a possible anthrax exposure.
"Obviously, with today being 9-11, we're all aware of what happened and first thing that comes to mind is that somebody sent something toxic in the mail," said Jackson, who was at his business office in LaPorte when his League City district director Lamoin Scott called him as she was sorting the mail in the early afternoon.
Scott opened the letter addressed to Jackson and only read part of it to the senator. Jackson said the beginning of letter started by saying the person had asked the senator to do something and nothing had been done. Jackson told Scott to call the police and evacuate the building.
The good news -- No Anthrax.
Posted by: Greg at
10:06 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
William Anthony "Tony" Karnes
Today, five years after the assault on America by jihadi Muslims, we pause to remember the 2996 people who died in the attacks of September 11, 2001.
As part of a coordinated effort to recall each and every person who died on that fateful day, I offer a few words in memory of Tony Karnes, a software trainer with Marsh & McLennan.
Tony worked in the World Trade Center in New York, and died at Ground Zero on September 11, 2001. He was 37 years old, and was survived by his partner John Winter and his sisters Brenda Vandever, Vicky Ratcliff and Gayle Barker.
The New York Times had this to say about Tony Karnes.
William Anthony Karnes made his living as a software trainer for Marsh & McLennan. But his life's passion was touting the virtues of his adopted hometown, New York, regaling his sisters with stories about the wonders of living in the city where anything is possible, a place grander than anything he imagined growing up back in tiny Corryton, Tenn.
At least twice a week, Mr. Karnes, 37, would phone home to Tennessee, as much to say "I love you" as to brag about his latest favorite restaurant, usually some Indian place. "He loved that there was so much to discover in New York," said John Winter, his domestic partner.
And he made sure to share his favorite discoveries. "It was a big kick for him to show us around his city," said his sister, Gayle Barker. "He'd take us to the Empire State Building, the top of the World Trade Center, Rockefeller Center or just walking through the streets."
The one thing Mr. Karnes couldn't find in his beloved Manhattan was true Southern cooking. His love of a good plate of pinto beans, corn bread, mashed potatoes and biscuits always managed to guide him back home to one of his sisters' dinner tables. In her mind, Mrs. Barker still imagines her brother sitting around the table. "I just keep thinking that this isn't really happening, that he's not dead. He's just on a long, long trip somewhere."
Writing three months after Tony's attack, John Winter had this to say about him.
Tony, you were my soulmate and the love of my life. After 3 months I still miss you more than anyone can realize.
The 3 years we had together were blissfully happy and oh how I wish we'd had longer to share our lives with each other.
I still love you so very much. HPD
In Tony's honor, the people of East Tennessee contributed $12,000 towards the purchase of the Freedom Engine -- a fire truck which operates as part of Ladder Company 14 in Harlem.
Tony's sisters offer a ray of hope in the face of the manifest evil of the September 11 attacks.
Tony, your sisters are still hurting. We are only saying goodnight but not goodbye.
To this I simply add a heart-felt "Amen!"
UPDATE 9/14/2006: I've decided to not merely shut, but also to hide, comments on this post. A liberal commenenter could not resist the urge to politicize the non-political while claiming to eschew politics. A Fascist troll began a series of hate-comments directed at me and about Tony. As such, I have taken the only appropriate course of action.
Posted by: Greg at
05:59 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 559 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Nice of you to do this, and nice of you to acknowledge his domestic partner. Good work.
Posted by: Dan at Sun Sep 10 15:36:32 2006 (IU21y)
2
Dan -- Why WOULDN'T I have acknowledged him?
You clearly have made an assumption about me -- and, indeed, about most conservatives -- that is completely unwarranted.
But I do appreciate the larger compliment.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 21:52:04 2006 (SUpU3)
3
I don't want to derail this thread further than your reaction to my compliment did. Given your refusal to support equal rights for Messrs. Karnes and Winters to get married, I was pleased to see you honor their relationship.
Posted by: Dan at Sun Sep 10 22:09:47 2006 (IU21y)
4
I don't want to derail this thread further than your reaction to my compliment did.
And then you proceed to do so.
What a no class move, Dan. You had to politicize this post, and then take umbrage when called upon it.
Shame!
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 22:25:22 2006 (SUpU3)
5
The siteowner had ALREADY politicised the post
by legitmitizing perversion in a way a hypothetical conservative post on the subject
would not have dared, but a more nearly conservative generation ago.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Tue Sep 12 07:53:06 2006 (DZbll)
6
I do no more than acknowledge what was in the man's obituary, Ken. That is not poliicizing anything -- it is recognizing the historical details of Tony Karnes' life.
In one more proof that the political spectrum is not a line but a circle, you and the Lefty above come togeher in the extremes by making everything political.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Sep 12 08:15:04 2006 (TDZqE)
7
Please.
You legitimitized it by the acknowledgement,but
like most self-identifying contemporary "conservatives", have compromised
traditional conservative values too much to realize it.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Thu Sep 14 08:46:20 2006 (EPkr9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
In Memoriam -- 9/11/2001
Originally Posted on September 11, 2004 -- As is my custom, I repost it today.
So many died that horrible day.
One was my classmate at Washington and Lee University, Commander Robert Allan Schlegel.
I would love to tell you he and I were close. That would be a lie.
I would love to share stories of great times together. I don't have any.
What I can tell you is that I remember Rob Schlegel as a good guy, a friend of some friends. I remember him as being a bright guy, sitting a couple rows over and a couple seats back in a US History class. One of those classmates you later wish you had gotten to know when you had the chance.
Rest in Peace.
May all the victims of September 11 and the many men and women of our armed forces who have died fighting terrorism since that day rest in peace.
And let us not forget those heroes who still live.
Posted by: Greg at
05:59 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
"Lan Astaslem"/"Lan Is'tislimo"
I will not submit to the forces of jihadi Islam. I will not surrender to the Religion Of Peace My Ass.
Rhymes With Right is a No Dhimmitude Zone.
H/T Michelle Malkin & Jawa Report
UPDATE: One of Rusty's commenters suggests a better phoenetic translation would be "Lan is'tislimo". I have modified my title accordingly.
Posted by: Greg at
11:50 AM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I like it. Defy the [illegitimately born] in their own language.
Speaking of which, how about some Spanish expressions for dealing with the "Open Borders" crown? I'd like to suggest "Mito de Aztlan caca de toro", which means "The myth of Aztlan is bull [solid waste]".
Posted by: Bigfoot at Tue Sep 19 13:45:00 2006 (YWRlP)
2
Oops, did I say "crown", I meant "crowd". That's "Open Borders" crowd.
Posted by: Bigfoot at Tue Sep 19 13:45:59 2006 (YWRlP)
3
I like it. What better way to defy the Islamobigots than in their own language? Now all we need are some Spanish expressions for dealing with the "open borders" crowd.
Posted by: Bigfoot at Tue Sep 19 13:52:06 2006 (ALbgB)
4
'Lan Ist'aslimo' is grammatically wrong. Following the particle 'lan', the verb should be in the jussive mood, ist'aslim; with no 'o' (actually 'u' is more correct than 'o'). A sympathizer, AKA 'The Astasamb'
Posted by: The Astaslamb at Tue Jan 22 08:37:42 2008 (9ZLFK)
5
tryiwafoh rfmuygp uosdncj tqifejwko rpew qnze olrf
Posted by: yumae wrjsxlo at Fri Jun 20 02:55:43 2008 (OnpJf)
6
qnovswp iwpqeosdn colzvy mplhaj rqgkw npge huemop
srpwm awtd
Posted by: afstel wvcsghp at Fri Jun 20 02:56:58 2008 (JUBWh)
Posted by: Albina-ps at Sat Jun 28 10:29:35 2008 (WlA5B)
Posted by: huge japanese tits at Thu Jul 10 17:41:13 2008 (tc3K3)
Posted by: action lawyer new york at Sat Jul 12 11:48:43 2008 (CfsB6)
Posted by: milf getting anal sex at Fri Aug 22 10:15:13 2008 (z2ola)
Posted by: Albina-vf at Thu Nov 6 04:25:14 2008 (mHoCI)
Posted by: Albina-zw at Sat Nov 8 14:22:54 2008 (VUzoz)
Posted by: Albina-at at Sun Nov 9 09:38:58 2008 (VUzoz)
Posted by: Albina-pl at Sat Nov 15 15:50:07 2008 (L6JoW)
Posted by: Albina-bb at Thu Nov 27 22:45:57 2008 (TH9pw)
Posted by: Albina-gj at Fri Nov 28 05:19:57 2008 (UIWyl)
Posted by: Albina-cd at Fri Nov 28 05:35:12 2008 (CtUwW)
18
comment3,
I like this darvocet, zrzjae,
Aricept Information, 156,
Short Mini Skirt Galleries For Everybody, 026,
I like this bactrim, =DDD,
Pictures of buy zovirax, xhtump,
Posted by: gunar4sin at Tue May 5 06:08:34 2009 (4sMMr)
Posted by: jajawadik at Thu May 7 02:37:31 2009 (M9Xb8)
Posted by: John790 at Sat May 9 10:30:21 2009 (uiQF3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 10, 2006
Oderint Dum Metuint
As I read Harry Turtledove's latest book in the "Settling Accounts" Trilogy,
The Grapple, I encountered the above unfamiliar Latin phrase. Attributed to the Roman poet Lucius Accius, it translates roughly as follows.
Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.
On this, the eve on the anniversary of 9/11, might I suggest that the words are the appropriate policy for the civilized nations of the world to follow regarding the jihadi Muslims who attacked the US five years ago -- and who have been permitted to conduct a campaign of terror against the civilized people's of the world for far too long.
Posted by: Greg at
01:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
September 07, 2006
Al-Qaeda Again Admits 9/11 Guilt
The terrorist shills at al-Jizzbag al-Jazeera have released another propaganda tape from al-Qaeda proclaiming their guilt for the 9/11 attacks.
Al-Jazeera broadcast Thursday what it called a previously unshown video in which al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden is seen meeting with some of the Sept. 11 hijackers. The station did not say how it obtained the video, which was produced by As-Sahab, al-Qaida's media branch.
The video showed bin Laden sitting with his former lieutenant Mohammed Atef and Ramzi Binalshibh, another suspected planner of the Sept. 11, 2001, suicide hijackings.
Atef, also known as Abu Hafs al-Masri, was killed by a U.S. airstrike in
Afghanistan in 2001. Binalshibh was captured four years ago in Pakistan and is in U.S. custody, and this week President Bush announced plans to put him on military trial.
In the video, bin Laden was wearing a dark robe and white headgear walking in a mountainous area. He smiled as he greeted several men, which the tape said were Sept. 11 hijackers.
Hopefully that will shut up the folks who claim that the WTC as brought down by a government plot -- including the Democrat candidate for Congress in Florida's 15th Congressional District, Bob Bowman, who claims that Dick Cheney did it.
Posted by: Greg at
10:32 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Not much motivation for this guy to shut up when he's dealing with a vice-president who lied repeatedly about Saddam's connection to Al Qaeda, and who proved his absolute ignorance by asserting the Iraq insurgency was in its last throes in 2004-and refusing to apologize for it or correct himself as recently as a few weeks ago.
Conspiracy kooks or warmongers--I find the former more endearing.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 05:26:41 2006 (Cs2j3)
2
Yawn! I think I hear billygoats on their way to your bridge.<br>
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 16:06:53 2006 (gNMpq)
3
Yeah -- unless the warmongers are murdering Jews for you. Then you support them, and claim they are doing the work of Christ.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 16:15:22 2006 (gNMpq)
4
The siteowner needs a little work on that Christian proscription against bearing false witness. Like calling an entire nation of Christians "false Christians" if they opposed Israel's barabrity. Bear with him.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:14:30 2006 (Cs2j3)
5
The siteowner needs a little work on that Christian proscription against bearing false witness. Like calling an entire nation of Christians "false Christians" if they opposed Israel's barbarity. Bear with him.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:15:13 2006 (Cs2j3)
6
So for those who missed that, Muslims who murder Jews (and presumably others who don't follow Ken's theology) are doing the Lord's works and are, in fact, Christians in their own hearts.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 12:38:40 2006 (BoAeo)
7
As Lebanese Christian Maronites say, Israel murdered legion in its recent barbaric attack While the siteowner took glee and exhorted it onward.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Sep 11 06:28:18 2006 (EPkr9)
8
Clearly Israel failed to kill a sufficient number of people in Lebanon -- there are still members of Hezbollah (and supporters) left alive.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 11 11:33:01 2006 (Pf4yE)
9
Hezbollah is an integral part of the Lebanese government so the siteowner officially advocates destruction of that government, which he unofficially did during Israel's recent barbaric
incursion.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Sep 13 07:23:37 2006 (DZbll)
10
Yeah, I do advocate the utter destruction of the Lebanese government -- just as I did the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.
"You are either with us, or you are with the terrorists." Those were teh words of a great man five years ago.
And we know your choice, Ken. You've expressed it often enough.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Sep 13 08:32:44 2006 (xw93t)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 06, 2006
Editor Killed -- Offended Islamo-Fascists
If this were the work of fundamentalist Christians of neo-conservatives, it would be front-page news around the globe. Instead, it gets buried on page A23 of the Washington Post -- and not given any significant play elsewhere.
But then again, we are so used to the barbarism of the jihadi Islam that this barely causes a ripple in the cosmic force of the universe.
A Sudanese newspaper editor who infuriated Muslim fundamentalists last year by printing an article that concerned questions about the parentage of the prophet Muhammad was found dead Wednesday in Khartoum, the capital.
Masked gunmen abducted Mohamed Taha, editor in chief of Al-Wifaq, from his home Tuesday. His decapitated body was found Wednesday in another section of the city. His head was beside the body, and his hands and feet had been bound, the Reuters news service reported.
Groups of tearful Sudanese reporters gathered outside a mosque in Khartoum on Wednesday night, according to news reports.
Reporters Without Borders, a group that promotes press freedoms worldwide, condemned the killing.
"We express our solidarity with our colleagues in Khartoum, for whom this cowardly murder is a harsh ordeal," the organization said in a statement. "The Sudanese authorities must do their utmost to see that light is shed on this tragedy, so that both the perpetrators and those who instigated it are brought to trial."
Last year, Taha published an article that referred to a centuries-old text by a Muslim historian that raised questions about the prophet's lineage. Religious leaders in Khartoum denounced Taha's work, and scores of protesters called for his death.
That one would be convicted of a crime for offending the religious sensibilities of one's readers is atrocious -- especially when the offense is something so trivial as raising genealogical issues. That one would be murdered for it is intolerable -- but we go right on tolerating it out of sensitivity to the followers of jihadi Islam. At what point will we recognize that jihadi Islam is noting but a gigantic conspiracy to violate basic human rights?
Posted by: Greg at
10:04 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Would that American Christians would take similar offense at the likes of Mapplethorpe and "Last Testament" sorts. Christian Europe had much less patience in its heyday, though it went too far,perhaps, in Servetus' case.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 05:31:38 2006 (Cs2j3)
2
So now you argue for the murder of those who disagree with your theology?
Yep -- that is part and parcel of both Christian identity and Islam,
and clearly indicates that you belong to one of those two false cults.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 16:04:16 2006 (gNMpq)
3
Yeah, milquetoast. "Piss Christ" and Mapplethorpe's anti-Christian productions are
mere "disagreements" with "theology."
No wonder the Moslems are winnning with
pantywaist "conservatives" like this, whose
enthusiasm for militancy is limited to urging Israel to kick ass.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:20:31 2006 (Cs2j3)
4
Actually, Ken, it is what separates the civilized from the barbarians.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 12:33:45 2006 (BoAeo)
5
Except when you are exonerating the barbarism of Israel in Lebanon.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Sep 11 06:30:08 2006 (EPkr9)
6
No -- Israel was killing the barbarians -- the jihadi terrorists of
Hezbollah. Any civilian casualties belong at the doorstep of that
terrorist organization, which hid like cowards among civilians.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 11 11:35:13 2006 (Pf4yE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 05, 2006
Who Does Al-Qaeda Quote?
Hat's off to
Rusty Shackleford for making this pointed observations!
If Islamofascism and the Religious Right have so much in common, then how come the terrorists never quote Pat Robertson? Instead, they are constanting quoting icons of the Left to support their positions. They even use clips from Fahrenheit 9/11 in this propaganda film.
And when American Taliban Adam Gadahn decides to name drop, it isn't Jerry Falwell that he cites for moral authority. It's George Galloway, Robert Fisk, and Seymour Hersh.
Indeed.
H/T Right Wing News & Right On The Left Coast
Posted by: Greg at
10:36 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
But Pat Robertson is a false prophet, as Rushdooney and North pointed out, with allusion to the proper Biblical punishment for such. Since I am not a theonomist I won't go there, but the fact that Israel-loving clownish charlatans like Robertson and Falwell are America's leading representatives of "traditional" majority religion, shows the marked decadence of the nation. the post-Christian nation, I might add.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 05:38:20 2006 (Cs2j3)
2
Sorry we cannot all be Christian Identity like you, Ken.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 16:09:35 2006 (gNMpq)
3
more bearing false witness sinning.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:27:42 2006 (Cs2j3)
4
Well, Ken, I apply the old adage "If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it must be a duck."
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 12:34:32 2006 (BoAeo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
In Their Own Words -- Terrorists Remain A Threat
Imagine that -- President Bush would do something so shockingly unfair as to
turn the words of the jihadi terrorists against them in order to make the case that they remain a threat!
President Bush issued a stern warning yesterday about what he called the continuing terrorist threat confronting the nation, using the haunting words of Islamic extremists to support his assertion that they remain determined to attack the United States.
Abandoning his practice of only rarely mentioning al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, Bush repeatedly quoted him and purported terrorist letters, recordings and documents to make his case that terrorists have broad totalitarian ambitions and believe the war in Iraq is a key theater in a wider struggle.
"Iraq is not a distraction in their war against America" but the "central battlefield where this war will be decided," Bush said in an address before the Military Officers Association of America.
Citing the internal communications of terrorists was a dramatic new tactic to advance familiar arguments from Bush in defense of his strategy. The remarks came less than a week before the nation observes the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and two months before midterm elections in which the administration's national strategy and competence promise to be pivotal questions.
The terrorists in Iraq see themselves as part of the same struggle that brought about 9/11 -- why can't the president's opponents?
Posted by: Greg at
10:05 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Bush is so full of shit, if he were incharge on Dec 8 1941 we'd have invaded Bolivia. And you like the seriously porcine asshat you are will suport this fucking clown no matter what.
Posted by: Nunya Biddness at Wed Sep 6 11:54:47 2006 (8ruhu)
2
What a crock, you coward.
And by the way, i can't help but notice your silence on the Holocaust post -- I guess you know when you've been slapped down good.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Sep 6 13:05:49 2006 (7P+7S)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 04, 2006
The Under-Reporting Of Anti-Semitic Attacks
Just yesterday, I noted that Muslims are quick to claim increases in anti-Muslim attacks whenever tehre is more news about jihadi terrorist activities -- even if there is no evidence to support the claim and even if the "attacks" are really committed by Muslims themselves.
But did anyone realize that there was an increase in anti-Semitic incidents in Great Britain over the last few weeks, as Israel fought to defend its existance?
The number of anti-Semitic incidents in Great Britain has risen sharply since the start of the Lebanon war, according to an organization dedicated to the safety of Britain's Jewish community.
According to Mark Gardner, spokesman of the Community Security Trust, there were over 90 incidents of anti-Semitism in Britain during July, including attacks on Jewish-owned stores, hate mail sent to representatives of the Jewish community and verbal and physical attacks on Jews in public. Over the past few years, the monthly average has been 10 to 30 such attacks.
The British report is merely the latest in a series of reports documenting an increase in anti-Semitic incidents throughout Europe in the past two months.
On Thursday, an all-party parliamentary inquiry into anti-Semitism in Britain will publish a report that is expected to declare anti-Semitism a serious problem and call on the government to fight it. Committee Chair Denis MacShane MP said in yesterday's London Times that the CST's figures "confirm the evidence given to us that anti-Semitic attacks are a very real problem."
Gardner told The Times that the July incidents "were more dispersed than usual," noting that "it is usually a small number [of people] responsible for a large number of attacks, but these were very widespread across the country and included graffiti attacks on synagogues in Edinburgh and Glasgow."
Hate mail sent to senior Jewish figures blamed them for the deaths of Lebanese children in Beirut, Gardner told The Times.
I wonder -- would the same be found here in the United States? And if so, why haven't such attacks been highlighted? After all, such incidents against muslims are freely reported and loudly decried in the media -- why not some equal treatment?
Posted by: Greg at
09:19 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 2 kb.
1
if British Jews had made known their opposition to Tony Blair's poodle act, joining in Bush's crusade to protect Israel by invading Iraq, they could have reached rapprochment with UK's Muslim population.
http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23083
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 05:44:45 2006 (Cs2j3)
2
In other words, you believe that the Jews deserve what they get for failing to play their proper roles as dhimmis to the Muslims.
Presumably, then, you would similarly support attacks on Muslims in America for their failure to speak forcefully against terrorism and root out the jihadis in their midst.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 16:11:58 2006 (gNMpq)
3
You missed the appropriate parallel.
If Blair and the UK should not have helped US anti-Islamic foreign policy, then the US should not have the policy in the first place. When the US forces Israel to the West Bank, as UN resolutions and justice demand, and cuts aid to Israel, I'll lecture the Moslem community here as to why it should appreciate our newly found fairness. When the US gets out of Iraq, and quits interfering with Iran's right to develop energy, ditto.
When the US arranges a deal to make the Mideast nuclear-free by dismantling Israel's undeclared weaponry, I'll demand Moslems here show their
appreciation by turning in all suspicious
cranks.
Fair enough?
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:43:20 2006 (Cs2j3)
4
No.
But I will support getting rid of Israel's nukes.
I think dropping them on Iran and Syria sound like excellent options.
And as far as doing to Israel what was done to Czechoslovakia in 1938 is concerned, not a chance. We do not destroy our friends to appease our enemies.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 12:52:57 2006 (BoAeo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2006
Neither Helpful Nor Acceptable
These dirtbags are clearly upset by the barbarism of the followers of the Religion Of Peace, but
mimicking it is clearly not the answer.
FAR-RIGHT extremists have adopted the tactics of Islamic jihadists by posting videos on the internet in which they threaten to behead British Muslims.
The films show balaclava-clad white British men brandishing guns, knives and clubs, calling on all Muslims to leave the United Kingdom or be killed. One appears to be a soldier who has served in the Gulf.
In one film a man tells Muslims to “go homeâ€� or risk being burnt alive. He threatens: “I’ll cut your head off,â€� and claims to have “comradesâ€� across Britain who have “had enoughâ€�.
The videos have all been made since the arrest three weeks ago of suspects connected to the alleged plot to blow up transatlantic jets. Their style mimics the “martyrdom videosâ€� of Islamic radicals talking about their plans for terrorist outrages against the West.
The release of the videos on YouTube, an American-based open-access website, coincides with reports of a rise in the number of attacks on mosques.
I'm curious -- is there an actual rise in the number of attacks on mosques that has been documented, or are we simply talking about claims by Muslim groups of such an increase. After all, it seems like every time Islamists engage in an act of barbarism, the usual apologists for Muslim terror claim that they are te evictims of eve more hatred -- claims that are never retracted after the events are shown to be hoaxes or frauds committed by Muslims themselves.
But I do have a question about these videos -- are they really threats against Muslims, or are they parodies intended to satirize the barbarism of the jihadi pigs around the world? Not, of course, that it makes a particular difference, for the apologists for islamist terrorism won't be willing to distinguish between the two, any more than they are willing to condemn the real videos from their co-religionists engaged in terrorism around the globe.
OPEN TRACKBACKING: Samantha Burns, Stuck On Stupid, Bacon Bits, Third World County, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, Dumb Ox, Adam's Blog, Is It Just Me?, Random Yak, Median Sib, Selective Amnesia, Stop the ACLU, Basil’s Blog; Comedian Jenée: People are Idiots , Woman Honor Thyself, Conservative Cat, Church and State, bRight and Early, Right Wing Nation; Jo’s Cafe, MacBro’s Page, Leaning Straight Up; The Amboy Times; Assorted Babble, NIF, Imagine Kitty, Oblogatory Anecdotes, The Uncooperative Blogger, Random Yak, Mark My Words, Pursuing Holiness, Clash of Civilizations, stikNstein
Posted by: Greg at
05:44 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 436 words, total size 6 kb.
1
It looks like the MSM is just doing their best to throw some more gasoline onto the fire. Betcha that'll result in more muslim rioting. They'll excuse that as well... saying they have a right to be upset after those videos.
Posted by: beth at Mon Sep 4 16:01:18 2006 (X6tm3)
2
if the "far Right" individuals and parties
the siteowner largely condemns had had their way,there would be no Moslem problem in England(Enoch Powell, BNP, National Front).
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 05:47:08 2006 (Cs2j3)
3
I think Sting and the Police tagged you and yor sort some years back with this very appropriate lyric that I've altered in yoiur honor.
"Kenny's joined the National Front, he always was a little runt, He's got his hand in the air with the other cunts."
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 05:56:49 2006 (CSAGP)
4
http://www.punk77.co.uk/groups/rockagainstracism.htm
yeah, you're in line with the commies who turned on Clapton when he famously urged youth to join the Front and support Enoch. With milquetoasts like you leading non-resistance,no wonder celebrities quickly retreat when they show some bravery.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 12:49:02 2006 (Cs2j3)
5
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. And in this case, you have been pegged quite accurately.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 13:00:03 2006 (BoAeo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Not A Hate Crime?
Certainly sounds like a hate crime to me --
and a terrorist attack to boot.
Surveillance video recovered by Montreal police shows a masked man throwing a firebomb at the door of an orthodox Jewish school in an attack early Saturday.
The bomb started a fire but the damage was described as minimal.
Police said a neighbour heard what sounded like a window breaking just after midnight and looked out to see the main entrance of the Taldos Yakov Yosef school in Outremont in flames.
In the video, the man takes a few steps toward the entrance, then steps back to throw a lighted Molotov cocktail. He removes his mask as he steps out of the video frame, but his face is not visible.
Although officials of Jewish groups disagree, police have been unwilling to declare the attack a hate crime. In the absence of graffiti or other other evidence, it is being treated as an unexplained case of arson.
I wonder -- in the absence of a note or grafitti, would a similar attack on a Muslim institution be treated as "an unexplained case of arson"? Or would it be presumed to be a bias-related attack?
I think we can all answer that without too much trouble.
Posted by: Greg at
05:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 1 kb.
Al-Qaeda Wants You -- To Convert To ROPMA
That's the
Religion Of Peace My Ass, of course.
And if you don't, you can die at the hands of the jihadi faithful. Malkin transcribes part of the video.
"Islam is the only religion acceptable to God and came with the revealed book, the Koran, which abrogates all previous revelations, like the Torah and Evangel... God recognizes no separation between religion and state..."
"To Americans and the rest of Christendom we say, either repent (your) misguided ways and enter into the light of truth or keep your poison to yourself and suffer the consequences in this world and the next..."
"If the Zionist crusader missionaries of hate and counter-Islam consultants like Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Michael Scheuer, Steven Emerson, and yes, even the crusader-in-chief George W. Bush were to abandon their unbelief and repent and enter into the light of Islam and turn their swords against the enemies of God, it would be accepted of them and they would be our brothers in Islam. And we send a special invitation to all of you fighting Bush's crusader pipe dream in Afghanistan, Iraq, and wherever else W. has sent you to die."
So much for the believe that the God of the Jews, of the Christians, and the Muslims are the same God. They don't seem to believe that, so why should the rest of us -- no matter what my troll Ken Hoop and his "religious experts" say about the matter.
Captain Ed points to a historical analog for the American propagandist for the Religion Of Peace -- Lord Haw-Haw, the Nazi propagandist of WWII. May they meet the same fate.
Posted by: Greg at
01:35 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 287 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The myth that our Homeland Security morons are preaching is that only Islamic extremists or my favorite..Islama-fascists (Thanks W) are dangerous. That's true to the extent that many Muslims, Christians or whatever treat religion with ritualistic indifference. But look at what in the current versions of their "holy books". Before paradise came come to earth, the Jews must all be killed and the Christians and others must be subjugated and taxed.
Also Islam is not as most religious experts claim the third Abrahimic faith. Allah is not Jehovah. He was originally one of a host of pagan gods, had a wife and 2 daughters. Google "Satanic Verses" and "Christianity vs Islam" if you're interested in the truth. Thankfully I am a Christian who believes that while things will get bloody and more violent than the world has yet seen, love will triumph when Christ returns. And the followers of the false prophet will suffer eternally for their jihadist beliefs.
Posted by: Jim Moss at Mon Sep 4 02:41:54 2006 (nbzp1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 02, 2006
Another ROPMA Alert
Representatives of ROPMA (Religion of Peace, My Ass!) have
issued a statement making it clear what their attitude is towards we infidels.
Palestinian militants who held two Fox News journalists hostage for nearly two weeks threatened in a statement posted online Saturday to abduct non-Muslims visiting the Palestinian territories and kill them unless their demands were met.
The statement, posted in the name of the Holy Jihad Brigades on a Web site frequently used by militants, said the group would kill any hostages it takes unless they converted to Islam, paid a ransom or Muslim prisoners were exchanged for their release.
"Any infidel blood will have no sanctity," the group said in the statement.
That's right -- we infidels are all targets, and we are subject to killing if we don't knuckle under to the demands of the followers of ROPMA.
I'm curious -- where are all the outraged liberals and "moderate Muslims" who were offended by Ann Coulter's comments about forcibly converting terrorists and their supporters to Christianity in the wake of 9/11? They seem strangely silent following the forced conversion of the Fox News hostages and this statement.
So let me proudly proclaim my position on this matter.
There is no God but God; and Jesus Christ is His only begotten Son.
Allah is simply Satan, and Muhammad is his false prophet.
OPEN TRACKBACKING: Samantha Burns, Stuck On Stupid, Bacon Bits, Third World County, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, Dumb Ox, Adam's Blog, Is It Just Me?, Random Yak, Median Sib, Selective Amnesia, Stop the ACLU, Basil’s Blog; Comedian Jenée: People are Idiots , Woman Honor Thyself, Conservative Cat, Church and State, bRight and Early, Right Wing Nation; Jo’s Cafe, MacBro’s Page, Leaning Straight Up; The Amboy Times; Assorted Babble, NIF, Imagine Kitty, Oblogatory Anecdotes, The Uncooperative Blogger
Posted by: Greg at
04:16 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 5 kb.
1
The vast majority of religious scholars would disagree with Greg's equation of Allah with Satan, regardless of the reactive extremism of jihadism's tactics.
In the same spirit, they would disagree with Orthodox Judaism's equation of Christians with polytheists.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 3 06:37:03 2006 (Cs2j3)
2
The Quran explicitly states that Jesus is not the Son of God -- and is not divine. It also states that the Gospel account of the Crucifixion and the resurrection is false. And the Quran claims for itself the status of being the literal spoken word of God.
In light of that, Ken, I have some questions for you.
1) Is Jesus the only begotton Son of God, and is he "God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God, one in being with the Father"?
2) Did Jesus die on the cross, did he descend to the dead, and did he rise again on the third day, all in order to bring us salvation?
3) Is the New Testament the inspired Word of God? Is Jesus the Word Made Flesh? If so, how can the Quran be the literal spoken word of God as it claims?
4) In light of these fundamental contradictions between the teachings of the Quran and the Bible (each of which is supposed to be the Word of God) we are left with three options: a) the God of the Bible is Satan, the Father of Lies; b) Allah, the god of the Quran, is Satan, the Father of Lies; or, c) both books of scripture are the work of Satan, the Father of Lies. To which school of thought do you subscribe?
Oh, and by the way, Ken -- Islamic teaching ALSO equates the worship of Jesus with polytheism.
Now I'll be interested to see how Ken responds to this, given his earlier comments stating Hezbollah and Hamas terrorists are crypto-Christians doing the work of God by killing Jews and seeking to destroy Israel. He did this by taking the long-standing Christian belief in baptism by desire (in which someone explicitly believes in the saving power of Jesus Christ) and infusing it with elements of Karl Rahner's "anonymous Christianity" (the notion that someone can explicitly reject belief in the saving power of Jesus Christ yet still be saved because their life mirrors a hidden belief in Jesus that even they did not know they had).
But then again, I suppose it is possible that he will have some explanation, given that he has previiously espoused elements of both Marcionism (the belief that the OT is false and the God of the OT is not the God of the NT) and Arianism (the belief that Jesus was merely a man and only the adopted son of God) and yet claimed to be fully orthodox in his belief.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 3 10:23:59 2006 (MMgxc)
3
The siteowner sides with an anti-Christian state
founded on strains of the same Pharisiasm which
prodded the crucifixion of Christ. This
state,subsidized by America, creates the
anti-Christian animus of the Palestinians in question
here.
Because the siteowner sides with a community whose
Talmud contains open attacks on not only the Divinity
of Christ, but on his status as a noble teacher, he
impertinently seeks to act as an inquisitor on my
degree of Christian orthodoxy, as a diversionary
tactic and probably in a self-diversionary role as
well.
In this context, the fact he calls Lebanese Maronites
who have come to side with Hezbollah because of
Israel's barbarism "false Christians" is an
ancillary product of his a priori sanctioning of
Jewish racism which sets the stge for consequent
political and spiritual sinning by the siteowner.
I accept no inquisitions from such a person.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 9 06:05:11 2006 (Cs2j3)
4
In other words, you are too cowardly to answer. You are unwilling to even answer questions that come directly from scripture and the fundamental creeds of Christianity.
This leads me to believe that you are not, in fact, a Christian at all -- not even of the gheretical Christian Identity form that I have previously presumed -- but that you are, in fact, a Muslim masquerading as a Christian.
After all, giving orthodox Christian answers would require you to commit the sin of apostasy from Islam -- and so you therefore temporize and find excuses not to answer at all so as to avoid the trap I have set for you. Avoiding it, however, clearly sets you apart as one who is either unwilling or unable to profess faith in Christ, and therefore either ashamed of the Gospel or not a believer in it.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 9 15:19:56 2006 (gNMpq)
5
You have been setting ineffectual traps for me for months. Along the way you have established yourself as a hybrid Judeo-Christian pagan, exalting the state of Israel in mystical fashion. I would also not answer inquisitorial questions from similar hybrids such as Robertson and Falwell, so to the degree you respect these, you can feel in good compnay.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Sep 10 13:02:52 2006 (Cs2j3)
6
You might be surprised that I'm not a fan of either.
And you make it clear that you fear answering these questions because to do so would show you to be no Christian. Either that, or you are ashamed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which ammounts to the same thing.
And let me answer the questyions myself.
1) Yes!
2) Yes!
3) Yes! Yes! And therefore it cannot be.
4) In light of my earlier answers, the only possible choice is Option b) "Allah, the god of the Quran, is Satan, the Father of Lies."
Have you the faith of a baptized Christian to declare these truths? Or is your faith false and worthless, like salt that has lost its savor?
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 10 13:11:41 2006 (BoAeo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Brits Make More Terror Arrests
Looks like the UK is serious about
rooting out terrorists in their midst.
According to reports,
16 suspects have been arrested in connection with the latest disruption of terrorist plots.
ritish police said on Saturday they had arrested 16 men in two separate anti-terrorism operations just three weeks after uncovering a suspected plot to bring down U.S.-bound airliners over the Atlantic.
Fourteen of the men were held in London in an operation that a police source said focused on suspected “training, recruitment and encouraging others to take part in terrorist activity”.
Anti-terrorist police in Manchester arrested two men early on Saturday and were carrying out three searches but this was not linked to the London arrests, police there said.
Most of these arrests seem to be related to terrorist training camps within Great britain, and are unrelated to the airline bombing plot that was recently disrupted.
Furthermore, it appears that the Brits are taking no chances, and are engaged in a great deal of surveilance of those with suspected links to terrorism.
British police are currently trying to monitor "thousands" of potential security suspects, the head of the anti-terrorism unit at London's Metropolitan Police said in an interview to be broadcast Sunday.
In an interview recorded in July, before the arrest of more than two dozen people on suspicion of an alleged plot to blow up US-bound aircraft, Peter Clarke said Britain was facing an increasing threat from homegrown extremists.
He refused to give an exact figure about how many people he said were either directly or indirectly involved in plotting atrocities on British soil but said the number ran into four figures.
"I don't want to go down the numbers game, I don't think it's helpful," he told a BBC television programme entitled "Al-Qaida -- Time to Talk?"
"All I can say is that our knowledge is increasing and certainly in terms of broad description, the numbers of people who we have to be interested in are into the thousands."
He added: "That includes a whole range of people, not just terrorists, not just attackers, but people who might be tempted to support or encourage or to assist."
Clarke highlighted the potential for home-grown terrorism in Britain since the September 2001 attacks on the United States, implicitly citing the July 2005 London bombings carried out by four British Muslim suicide bombers.
"What we've learnt since 9/11 is that the threat is not something that's simply coming from overseas into the United Kingdom. What we've learnt, and what we've seen all too graphically and all too murderously, is that we have a threat which is being generated here within the United Kingdom."
here's hoping that we are doing the same sort of thing here in the US -- and that we can keep it secret from the ACLU, New York Times, Washington Post and other al-Qaeda associates who would rather embarrass the Bush Administration than keep America safe.
UPDATE: Surprise! Surprise! Looks like one of the targets in the current investigation may be a Muslim "school" in East Sussex. It seems like it was less interested in education students thanindotrinating them in violent jihad. So much for the "Religion of Peace".
Posted by: Greg at
03:04 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 541 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Gee I wonder if this sixteen is like the first twentyfour, and have no passports, no tickets, and no bomb making materials.
Posted by: Nunya Biddness at Sun Sep 3 08:51:25 2006 (8ruhu)
2
I know, you don't want terrorists arrested until after they have killed themselves and a lot of innocent people -- because after all, the successful prosecution of the Crusade Against Islamism is harmful to the political success of your political ideology.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Sep 3 09:44:29 2006 (MMgxc)
3
Hey!!! Asshole!!! Youever hear of "hard" evidence, that is what passports, tickets, and bomb making materials are. Until I see proof of those, all I see is a reactionary police force trying like hell to impose a "Minority Report" like state upon us. Stupid conservatard chickenshit chickenhawk.
Posted by: Nunya Biddness at Mon Sep 4 03:52:57 2006 (8ruhu)
4
We'll just put you down in the "Against Us" column.
And award you the Order of Osama -- Third Class.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 4 07:58:33 2006 (zkUZO)
5
Still a fucking pin-head when lamely attempting to argue anything to do with the law I see. Typical conservatard chickenshit chickenhawk.
Posted by: Nunya Biddness at Mon Sep 4 08:07:01 2006 (8ruhu)
6
Typical foul-mouthed al-Qaeda-supporting Leftard -- who is too cowardly to even leave real contact information when he posts to my site.
Keep showing this level of cowardice and they might give you oak-leaf clusters on your Order of Osama.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 4 08:15:10 2006 (zkUZO)
7
What exactly is you have against the law, there are LAWS governing this shit and you'd rather run the constitution through the fucking shredder. You support a war that you are un-willing to go fight your self, and you expect someone who (unlike your chickenshit ass) actually served to think your right. Guess again stupid gringo, until you can produce a DD-214 I think you should keep your fucking chickenhawk yap shut about that which you do not and can not know.
Posted by: Nunya Bidness at Mon Sep 4 09:51:20 2006 (8ruhu)
8
until you can produce a DD-214 I think you should keep your fucking chickenhawk yap shut about that which you do not and can not know.
Thank you for proving that it is, in fact, you who wish to run the Constitution through a shredder by supporting the establishment of a military dictatorship. Given your constant propagandizing on on behalf of the terrorists and the party that supports them (the Democrat Party), it seems pretty clear that you want an Islamo-Leftard military dictatorship.
By the way, I corrected your bigotted assertions over about the Catholic Church. Hope you enjoy a nice big helping of FACTS.
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/195307.php
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Sep 4 11:01:21 2006 (zkUZO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
202kb generated in CPU 0.0495, elapsed 0.3151 seconds.
74 queries taking 0.2805 seconds, 306 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.