May 13, 2007

How Can This Be?

This is impossible. Doesn't al-Qaida know that it doesn't exist in Iraq? The neo-Copperhead surrender monkeys in Congress have told us so!

An al-Qaida front group announced it had captured American soldiers in a deadly attack the day before, as thousands of U.S. troops searched insurgent areas south of Baghdad for their three missing comrades.

The statement Sunday came on one of the deadliest days in the country in recent weeks, with at least 124 people killed or found dead. A suicide truck bomb tore through the offices of a Kurdish political party in northern
Iraq, killing 50 people, and a car bombing in a crowded Baghdad market killed another 17.

And American troops are working hard to find their missing comrades.

About 4,000 American ground troops, supported by surveillance aircraft, attack helicopters and spy satellites, swept towns and farmland south of Baghdad on Sunday, searching for three American soldiers who disappeared Saturday after their patrol was ambushed, military officials said.

“Everybody is fully engaged, the commanders are intimately focused on this,” Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, the top American military spokesman, said at a news conference with reporters from the Iraqi news media, according to The Associated Press. He said the searchers were utilizing “every asset we have, from national assets to tactical assets.”

Troops surrounded the town of Yusufiya, near Mahmudiya along the eastern bank of the Euphrates River, conducted house-to-house searches and checked all cars entering and leaving town, The A.P. reported.

However, we know the track record of finding captured soldiers alive -- the barbarians we fight are well-known for their tactics of torture, beheading and mutilation of bodies.

MORE AT Michelle Malkin, Pirate's Cove, BlackFive

Posted by: Greg at 10:21 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I don't think anyone on the left denies that AQ is in Iraq now.  They weren't until Bush's ill-thought-out invasion, but they sure are now.  Bush has been played by bin Laden - it's a shame that they are commanded by someone with more intelligence and foresight (though lower morals) than we are.

Posted by: Dan at Mon May 14 11:11:56 2007 (IU21y)

2 Oh, you admit they are there.

You just want to run away from them, then.

Surrender -- not what I call a good option, but I hear it was favored in Vichy France (and among Democrats in 1864).

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon May 14 11:46:52 2007 (mG8tM)

3 Funny, though, that all your leaders (except Kucinich) were for the war before they were against it. Does that mean that they were dumber than the President (after all, by your reasoning he fooled them)?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon May 14 11:57:31 2007 (mG8tM)

4 You're welcome for the correction. Sorry I can't do a more thorough job of correcting your many mistakes about the left, but this place is overpopulated with straw men.

It doesn't take a whole lot of brains to fool someone, don't you agree?

Posted by: Dan at Mon May 14 23:00:04 2007 (IU21y)

5 So the premise of your post is wrong, and you don't even thank me for the correction?

You're welcome anyhow. Sorry I can't do a more thorough job of correcting your many mistakes about the left, but this place is overpopulated with straw men.

It doesn't take a whole lot of brains to fool someone, don't you agree?

Posted by: Dan at Mon May 14 23:50:23 2007 (IU21y)

6 sorry for the double post - the first one got a message indicating it hadn't made it.

Posted by: Dan at Tue May 15 00:21:21 2007 (IU21y)

7 Actually, Dan, i don't agree with you correction -- and would argue that if the person fooled is clearly not as smart/clever as the person who fooled them.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue May 15 09:17:08 2007 (k3KX3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0066, elapsed 0.0158 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0118 seconds, 36 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]