June 04, 2006
When will we hear the condemnation of this disruption of Pentecost Sunday Mass in Minnesota?
More than 50 gay rights activists wearing rainbow-colored sashes were denied Holy Communion at a Pentecost service yesterday at the Roman Catholic Cathedral in St. Paul, Minn., parishioners and church officials said.In an act that some witnesses called a "sacrilege" and others called a sign of "solidarity," a man who was not wearing a sash received a Communion wafer from a priest, broke it into pieces and handed it to some of the sash wearers, who consumed it on the spot.
Ushers threatened to call the police, and a church employee burst into tears when the unidentified man re-distributed the consecrated wafer, which Catholics consider the body of Christ. But the Mass was not interrupted, and the incident ended peacefully, said Dennis McGrath, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.
"It was confrontational, but we decided not to try to arrest the guy," he said.
Disrupting the service and profaning the Eucharist -- they need to be arrested next year.
More importantly, participants should be excommunicated next year.
And as far as condemnations -- who wants to bet that the only ones we hear are of the Church, not those who violated the sanctity of the cathedral.
Oh, and here's a suggestion -- why don't you try something like that at a Muslim house of worship? Oh, yeah, they will stone you or decapitate you, not just deny you communion.
Posted by: Greg at
11:32 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Dan at Mon Jun 5 02:27:11 2006 (YL8fx)
Posted by: JimBD at Mon Jun 5 10:02:49 2006 (GoE0N)
Posted by: Steven Yanis at Mon Jun 5 20:20:33 2006 (sjsAS)
When those who celebrate their first communion do exactly the same displaying their solidarity with Christ.
What did Christ say about Judement?
Posted by: norman warbreck at Mon Jun 5 22:40:49 2006 (wMViS)
On the other side you have those making a political/theological protest during the service.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Jun 5 22:48:39 2006 (PEFrQ)
One is a mark of celebration of the Eucharist and of unity with the Church.
The other is a profanation of the Eucharist with a political protest against the teachings of the Church.
But then again, Norman, maybe you consider the law hypocritical for treating consensual sexual intercourse between a husband and wife and forced sexual intercourse between a rapist and his victim differently, too.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Jun 6 09:52:11 2006 (ZktbQ)
21 queries taking 0.0265 seconds, 35 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.