June 04, 2006

Queer Activists Profane Mass In Minnesota

When Christians protest on public streets during pro-homosexual events, tehy face harrassment and arrest. If they attempted to actually interfere with the event, there would be oputrage.

When will we hear the condemnation of this disruption of Pentecost Sunday Mass in Minnesota?

More than 50 gay rights activists wearing rainbow-colored sashes were denied Holy Communion at a Pentecost service yesterday at the Roman Catholic Cathedral in St. Paul, Minn., parishioners and church officials said.

In an act that some witnesses called a "sacrilege" and others called a sign of "solidarity," a man who was not wearing a sash received a Communion wafer from a priest, broke it into pieces and handed it to some of the sash wearers, who consumed it on the spot.

Ushers threatened to call the police, and a church employee burst into tears when the unidentified man re-distributed the consecrated wafer, which Catholics consider the body of Christ. But the Mass was not interrupted, and the incident ended peacefully, said Dennis McGrath, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.

"It was confrontational, but we decided not to try to arrest the guy," he said.

Disrupting the service and profaning the Eucharist -- they need to be arrested next year.

More importantly, participants should be excommunicated next year.

And as far as condemnations -- who wants to bet that the only ones we hear are of the Church, not those who violated the sanctity of the cathedral.

Oh, and here's a suggestion -- why don't you try something like that at a Muslim house of worship? Oh, yeah, they will stone you or decapitate you, not just deny you communion.

Posted by: Greg at 11:32 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Horrible behavior. It sounds like they were out to impress each other more than to convince anybody.

Posted by: Dan at Mon Jun 5 02:27:11 2006 (YL8fx)

2 Don't special "hate crimes" apply both ways now?

Posted by: JimBD at Mon Jun 5 10:02:49 2006 (GoE0N)

3 That is just plain sad.

Posted by: Steven Yanis at Mon Jun 5 20:20:33 2006 (sjsAS)

4 It seems to me that there are double standards by the church. Turning away those who display a sash displaying their solidarity with Christ being gay.
When those who celebrate their first communion do exactly the same displaying their solidarity with Christ.
What did Christ say about Judement?

Posted by: norman warbreck at Mon Jun 5 22:40:49 2006 (wMViS)

5 I would disagree, Dan -- on one side you have a religious group seeking to maintain the sactity of its services and the integrity of its beliefs, following the instructions of its leadership with regard to those engaging in political/theological protest during a service.

On the other side you have those making a political/theological protest during the service.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Jun 5 22:48:39 2006 (PEFrQ)

6 Norman -- except there is a big difference.

One is a mark of celebration of the Eucharist and of unity with the Church.

The other is a profanation of the Eucharist with a political protest against the teachings of the Church.

But then again, Norman, maybe you consider the law hypocritical for treating consensual sexual intercourse between a husband and wife and forced sexual intercourse between a rapist and his victim differently, too.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Jun 6 09:52:11 2006 (ZktbQ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0165, elapsed 0.0379 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0265 seconds, 35 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]