April 22, 2007

Pennsylvania Imam: "Kill The Apostate"

And yet this same imam no doubt demands the full protection of the First Amendment for his loathsome belief system. However, he insists that author and human rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali must die for rejecting such barbarism.

Imam Fouad ElBayly, president of the Johnstown Islamic Center, was among those who objected to Hirsi AliÂ’s appearance.

“She has been identified as one who has defamed the faith. If you come into the faith, you must abide by the laws, and when you decide to defame it deliberately, the sentence is death,” said ElBayly, who came to the U.S. from Egypt in 1976.

* * *

Although ElBayly believes a death sentence is warranted for Hirsi Ali, he stressed that America is not the jurisdiction where such a crime should be punished. Instead, Hirsi Ali should be judged in a Muslim country after being given a trial, he added.

“If it is found that a person is mentally unstable, or a child or disabled, there should be no punishment,” he said. “It’s a very merciful religion if you try to understand it.”

Yeah, merciful if you are willing to submit to the barbarism of sharia and not use your head on pain of having it separated from your shoulders for daring to reject its false teachings.

Not content to seek this heroic woman's death, though, ElBayly and other Islamic leaders also sought to ban her speech at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. Fortunately, university officials let the lecture go on, but the mere fact that they were even willing to hear and consider their anti-freedom point of view is distressing. They should have been told to pound sand, and given precisely the amount of consideration that the KKK or American Nazi Party would be given if they came around demanding a speech be canceled.

ElBayly's statements leave me wondering if there is any possibility of his being deported back to Egypt. Regardless, his Islamist mosque must be put under intense surveillance and scrutiny, just like any Christian Identity pukes receive.

And I wonder -- where are the denunciations of such hate by so-called mainstream Muslims? Or are they silent because ElBayly accurately reflects the true nature of Islam?

MORE AT Jawa Report, LGF, Riehl World View , Ace of Spades HQ, Hot Air, PAWaterCooler.com, Right Voices, Blue Crab Boulevard, Freedom Zone, Sister Toldjah, Blog-o-Fascists, Atlas Shrugs

Posted by: Greg at 01:42 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 406 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I do not support the introduction of legislation which limits the content of any individuals based on perceived "hate" content.  I find it interesting that the anti Christian movement, those who claim that speaking out against homosexuality should be classified as hate speech; those folks must not see the "love" expressed by the Muslim Imams for those who don't fall in line with their beliefs.  I would hate to see this Imam go for a ride with Teddy in his car when he's had a little too much to drink and might run off into a body of water. 

Posted by: T F Stern at Mon Apr 23 01:36:28 2007 (z1IoH)

2 TF -- you know I have no support for hate speech laws. On the other hand, at what point does a call for the death of an individual for exercising the fundamental human rights of religious freedom and freedom of speech constitute a criminal act, or at least grounds for investigation as a potential terrorist? Especially when his rhetoric is no different than that which comes from the mouths of those with whom we are at war.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Apr 23 06:29:08 2007 (dJ4qB)

3 Hi Greg. I just wrote a post at the MuslimMatters blog (http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/23/moderate-in-the-extreme/) that touches briefly on this idea of demands for the voice of "moderate Muslims."

Posted by: Ruth Nasrullah at Tue Apr 24 01:34:49 2007 (zJa3G)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0043, elapsed 0.0121 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0087 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]