June 13, 2006
The Southern Baptist Convention elected Frank Page its new president Tuesday, choosing a pastor who had said that it would take a "miracle" for him to win and heralding a new direction for the denomination.Page's surprising win over two higher-profile candidates follows years of tightly scripted politics and intolerance for internal dissent. He called his victory evidence that Southern Baptists believe "we could do together a lot more and a lot better than what we can do separately."
"I'm a little taken aback by this," Page said. "Because I have not been known across the nation, ... I truly believe (the election) is God's people saying we want to see broadened involvement."
Winning just over 50 percent of the vote on the first ballot, Page bested Ronnie Floyd, a megachurch pastor from Springdale, Ark., and Jerry Sutton, pastor at Two Rivers Baptist Church in Nashville, Tenn., and currently the SBC's first vice president.
The 53-year-old Page is pastor at First Baptist Church in Taylors, S.C., a small, upstate community north of Greenville. During his campaign, he emphasized the importance of giving to the Southern Baptists' cooperative program, in which autonomous congregations pool money to fund overseas and domestic missions. That seemed to strike a chord with delegates to the SBC's annual meeting.
In the years since moderates stopped participating in SBC politics, candidates for the SBC presidency have typically run unopposed or faced only token opposition. But this year, concerns about stagnating memberships, declining baptism rates and the future of the cooperative program led to the first contested presidential race in recent memory.
Johnny Hunt, a pastor from Woodstock, Ga., was the leadership's choice for president but unexpectedly dropped out of the race in late April. He was replaced by Floyd, head of the First Baptist Church in Springdale, Ark., and the nearby Church at Pinnacle Hills.
Then Page entered the race, leading a group that criticized the low levels of cooperative program giving at Floyd's churches. Page's church, by contrast, gives 12 percent of its undesignated offerings to the program.
Many smaller Southern Baptist congregations see the cooperative program as a crucial collective effort for the denomination and the best way for them to carry out influential missionary and evangelistic work.
Rallying around Page were a group of younger pastors and others who have felt marginalized by an older generation that led the conservative takeover of the SBC in the 1970s and 1980s. Some have dissented on theological issues like whether strict Calvinists and charismatic Christians should be welcome in the denomination, while at least one has been reprimanded for airing concerns on his Internet blog.
The fundamentalist takeover that happened three decades ago revitalized the SBC, but created serious rifts within the denomination. Will this upset victory be the beginning of a new direction for the largest Protestant group in the United States, or will it merely be a brief interlude between traditionalist leaders?
Posted by: Greg at
10:48 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 520 words, total size 3 kb.
I never had an epiphany to actually go there since my affiliation is with the Church of Christ.
Even though I am younger to some by certain standards, I have a comfort zone that has a hard line that is rarely crossed, if even approached.
I have a traditionalist bent to my faith and that I am not into all the entertainment emphasis placed or influenced into the contemporary worship services we see and hear about in these community churches popping up all over the place these days.
I do not go to church to be entertained or presented a worship service that is centered on a stage presentation where we all sit and listen to a bunch of others singing songs of praise some of us cannot participate in without practice or concentrating on something other than the message within those songs.
We went to what we thought was a traditional worship service at this church at the correct time, and the folks in the service before ours tended to be the more elderly folks who are probably not into all of this stuff to begin with. So they are taken care of in the earliest service, with the traditional activities I am most identifiable with.
I guess this is why I have been scarce at church activities for many years. I feel the focus when I decided to not participate was heading in this direction, and it was not where I believe we should have been going.
I was right, but something recently hit me that maybe I should give it another try.
There is scripture that tells us not to forsake the fellowship, but at one time I thought the fellowship had forsaken me in the past.
One thing that I guess that most may have lost in the shuffle was that I always thought that church services and worship was to entertain and honor our Lord, to please him with our faith and love.
Not the other way around.
Posted by: boyo at Wed Jun 14 00:16:56 2006 (iL9qH)
21 queries taking 0.0081 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.