October 11, 2006
Juergen Kamm, the owner of a small German mail-order business, makes a modest living fighting neo-Nazis. His firm sells sloganeering T-shirts, music albums and books as part of a campaign to rid the country of extremists. "Smash Fascism!" one hot-selling button urges.Last week, however, a court in the city of Stuttgart ruled that under German law Kamm might as well be a Nazi himself. His crime? Selling items bearing swastikas, the Nazi symbol that has been forbidden here since the end of World War II.
Never mind that Kamm's company, Nix Gut, loosely translated as "No Good," displayed the swastika only inside a crossed-out circle or as part of other designs intended to impugn Nazis and their ilk. A panel of judges agreed with state prosecutors in Stuttgart that any reproduction of the symbol, no matter the context, risked making it socially acceptable again in Germany.
"The danger of familiarization is ever present," said presiding Judge Wolfgang Kuellmer. "In particular, this mass-market business risked undermining its taboo status."
I hate the swastika. I also hate the ubiquitous Che photo. But I wish that they are never banned -- because making them illegal just makes them attractive to a small segment of non-conformist, not just the moral midgets who accept the underlying philosophy.
Free speech is the key to killing malignant ideologies -- from Nazism to Communism to Islamism.
Posted by: Greg at
02:00 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.
The "democracy" (puppet government) the US installed post-WW2 is currently imprisoning any historian revisionists who dare to question the orthodox story as related to the entire history of the 1933-1945 era.
No wonder Iraqis/Iranians don't wish this kind of "democracy" implanted in their region.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Thu Oct 12 08:06:39 2006 (EPkr9)
And as you well know, I have spoken out against the imprisonment of your vile, intellectually deficient, morally retarded hero David Irving. His false teachings are repugnant to all with a sense of decency, but he has a fundamental right to speak his piece without government penalty. Indeed, i once did so in a discussion thread with response to your comments on that apologist for genocide.
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/195984.php
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/158659.php
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Oct 12 09:19:55 2006 (Ttrop)
Since you are a "world history" teacher, you will not object my urging readers to study Professor of History (Princeton) Arno Mayer's "WHY DID THE HEAVENS NOT DARKEN?" in which the esteemed Jewish educator makes the case that the Nazis never intended to "exterminate" Jews.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Oct 13 08:26:41 2006 (7GYBH)
But you can recommend the hate tract, which is rejected by serious historians.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Oct 13 11:38:03 2006 (4kIe7)
Another thing, that might actually be relevant to the post, is that by blogging and reading blogs we can open our eyes to opinions and views that we might not otherwise have the chance to experience
Anyways, those are my two thoughts. Have a great weekend!
Posted by: Tyler at Fri Oct 13 12:37:01 2006 (9+4xM)
Q.How is it possible that a Jewish Professor of History can write a "hate tract?
A.If he defies the siteowner's doctrinal beliefs in something capitalized the "Holocaust."
Tellingly, a religious historian who questioned the resurrection, would meet with a milder negative reaction from the siteowner. His prime concern is defending organized Zionism, which structured the favored myth.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Tue Oct 17 09:04:34 2006 (DZbll)
Actually, KKKen, the Holocaust is incredibly well-documented. Those who deny it are either anti-Semites or those who curry favor with them. After all, ther ewere kapos back during WWII. Mayer belongs in said category -- while you would have made a good aide to Himmler or Eichmann.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Oct 17 12:48:49 2006 (wfdL5)
21 queries taking 0.0095 seconds, 36 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.