August 19, 2006

Why The GOP Backs Lieberman

When you can't break the 10% level in polling data, and then sink below 5%, why shouldn't the party look elsewhere?

While some Republicans are quietly rooting for his Democratic opponent, Ned Lamont, because they feel he would be such a polarizing liberal target, many leading Republicans say it would serve the party better to have a centrist like Mr. Lieberman remain in office, particularly after being spurned by his own party.

But one thing is clear: there is little to no talk of bolstering Mr. Schlesinger, 48, the Republican nominee, a little-known former mayor of Derby who has registered polling numbers so low they are breaking records. Little known throughout the state, Mr. Schlesinger received attention this summer following reports in The Hartford Courant that he had gambled under a fake name and once had gambling debts. He has dismissed the accounts as irrelevant.

Mr. Schlesinger has reacted bitterly to the rejection by his own party, dismissing calls for him to leave the race. He maintains he can win by conveying his conservative platform to voters.

* * *

As Mr. SchlesingerÂ’s popularity has waned from a minuscule 9 percent in July to an almost invisible 4 percent in a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday, the question for Republicans has shifted to whether to embrace Mr. Lieberman.

GOP leaders have had to decide -- remain loyal to the party and hope for a win by the extreme liberal lamont, or act to support what is best for America by supporting Lieberman. I'm pleased that so many have put America first.

Posted by: Greg at 10:30 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.

1 So it's up to the GOP leaders to decide who becomes Senator from Ct.? Are you being sarcastic? The voters have no association with this America first notion you project? Is this some kind of defacto electoral college you beleive has the right to trump the voters wishes?

Posted by: scott Ely at Sun Aug 20 00:12:30 2006 (Bs8AB)

2 Clearly you are an idiot, scott.

The whole reason that so many GOP party leaders are backing Lieberman is because the polling data has consistently shown that over 90% of CT voters reject Schlesinger.

In other words, the GOP leaders are following the lead of the voters.

And besides, Scott, is it really your contention that people should place the good of the party above the good of the nation?

And i don't know where you get the notion that the GOP leaders are trumping the will of the voters -- the US Senator from CT will be elected by the voters of that state in November -- and the currnt numbers indicate that Lieberman may receive an absolute majoroty of all CT voters.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Aug 20 01:33:22 2006 (a3Gjz)

3

Not a question of party first or even nation first here...unless that nation is Israel.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Aug 20 06:51:45 2006 (7GYBH)

4 Oh that's right -- you find it appalling that a "sheenie", "hebe" or "kike" (all words you have used in emails to me) would dare to think he could be an American citizen -- much less a Senator.  Thanks for trotting out the dual loyalty canard again, you little Hitler wannabe.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Aug 20 08:12:14 2006 (j55D5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.0044, elapsed 0.0116 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0085 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]