October 18, 2007

Time For SCHIP Compromise

The President proposed a $5 billion dollar increase and expansion of the SCHIP program so that more poor children would be covered by the program -- and the Democrats have in turn claimed that he and his supporters are hate children if they don't support a $35 billion increase that would include not just poor kids, but also their parents and the kids of the middle class. Yesterday the veto of the program was sustained.

A failed veto override on a major children's health insurance program yesterday prompted House Democratic leaders to promise to push a new version of the bill, daring Republicans to oppose them.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the new proposal will contain only minor changes. Just before the vote, she had declared: "This is a banner issue for the Congress of the United States."

The vetoed bill would have expanded the $5 billion-a-year program by an average of $7 billion a year over the next five years, for total funding of $60 billion over that period. That would have been enough to boost enrollment to 10 million children, up from 6.6 million, and to dramatically reduce the number of uninsured children in the country, currently about 9 million, supporters say.

While Pelosi is willing to talk to Bush, she stressed that Democrats will accept nothing less than an expansion to 10 million children. "That's not negotiable," she said.

And therein lies the problem. Speaker 11% and Senate Majority Leader 11% and the rest of the 11% Party are so beholden to the Far Left "center" of their party that they are unwilling to consider substantive changes to the bill that could get it near unanimous support.

George W. Bush rightly vetoed the Democrat expansion of the GOP created and supported program, and now he and congressional Republicans are offering a somewhat larger expansion than initially proposed by the GOP -- I've heard figures around $11 billion, as well as the exclusion of illegal alien children and limits on those covered to "only" 300% of the poverty level. These are reasonable changes which Americans support. Will Speaker 11% quit playing politics with children's health and make sure that the children of the poor continue to receive medical coverage?

OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Stop the ACLU, Perri Nelson's Website, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Stix Blog, Right Truth, The Populist, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, and Dumb Ox Daily News, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Posted by: Greg at 11:07 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 433 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Let's trot some snowflake babies out there for good measure. It is taxing cigarettes...who cares.......The Decider has Decided to once again not care about what out country wants. And stop with this middle class stuff. You sound like Graves. Health insurance for someone making $83,000.....That is New York City. Not Kansas City. What a joke.

Posted by: PeachPit at Fri Oct 19 03:53:11 2007 (m9tb8)

2 Would that be like trotting out kids already covered under the original GOP-backed program to argue that the President's expanded coverage (which would also cover him) is inadequate to give him the coverage that he already gets? Too bad that they didn't bring out the child of some family grossing 80K a year and try to explain why those of us making half that should pay to cover their children while we struggle to pay our for our own medical insurance?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Oct 19 10:44:19 2007 (ybrNQ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0042, elapsed 0.0113 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0084 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]