April 16, 2009
The Perfect Response To A WaPo Anti-Gun Editorial
As usual, the Washington Post attacked the Second Amendment today, urging more limitation on the right of the people to keep and bear arms – you know, the right that the Bill of Rights says shall not be infringed. This time they argued that one reason for banning guns in National Parks is the lack of crime there.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
But I am particularly fond of this retort to that argument from k_romulus, one of those who took the time to comment on that absurd argument.
And I love how the Ed Board complains that guns should be banned in "urban areas" like DC because of "too much" crime, and also banned in remote outposts like National Parks because of "too little" crime. Sounds like Goldilocks to me, but without the "just right." LOL!
4/16/2009 10:04:49 AM
So you see, banning guns is the all-purpose answer for the Post. Too much crime? Ban guns because they are the cause of it. Too little crime? Ban guns because they aren’t needed. I wonder – is there anyplace where the Washington Post feels there is just the right amount of crime to let the American people fully exercise their Second Amendment rights?
Posted by: Greg at
09:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Useful links, purchase hoodia online, nfy,
Posted by: generic soma at Fri May 22 01:19:48 2009 (PglBi)
5kb generated in CPU 0.0093, elapsed 0.0291 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0227 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
21 queries taking 0.0227 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.