May 08, 2007
Sullivan Does Not Get It On Gun Rights
Andrew Sullivan asks what, it seems to me, is a really dumb question here.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
If gun rights are civil rights, why would anyone feel the need to hide the fact that they own one?
I suppose one could also ask why, if freedom of speech and association are civil rights, one would wish to engage in anonymous speech or keep one's membership in political organizations secret. Doesn't Sullivan believe in a right to privacy?
Posted by: Greg at
09:59 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Brilliant analysis. Similarly, those of us who believe that contraception is a constitutional right should only have sex in public.
It blows my mind how foolish some of our paid pundits are . . .
It blows my mind how foolish some of our paid pundits are . . .
Posted by: Dan at Wed May 9 00:41:09 2007 (IU21y)
2
Be careful -- a homosexualist like Sullivan might go for public sex, since sodomy is the newest constitutional right decreed by the Supreme Court.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed May 9 12:51:26 2007 (ZDou9)
3
Well technically those records are public. But the Tennesean publishing them in the first place is a much greater problem than Sully's POV. Sully has preconceived notions while the Tennesean has a lack of journalistic standards and a case of bias.
Posted by: Dyre42 at Thu May 10 00:26:22 2007 (+PHDb)
5kb generated in CPU 0.0069, elapsed 0.0144 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0099 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
21 queries taking 0.0099 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.