May 07, 2005

Schumer To Bush -- "Censor The Right"

I want to know how a representative of a party that believes "Bush is a Nazi" is legitimate political speech, has a congressman give an interview to a gay website in which he calls the vice president an "ass-kisser", and whose Senate leader calls the president "a loser" in front of a class full of high school kids could have the guts to go on the air and make such a hypocritical radio address.

Sen. Charles Schumer, a leading Democrat in the fight over judicial nominees, urged President Bush to intervene and rein in the strongest conservative critics of Democratic opposition to some candidates.

Schumer, D-N.Y., delivered his party's weekly radio address today, in which he decried "a whiff of extremism in the air the likes of which we haven't seen in decades."

Without naming any, Schumer criticized "small groups ... trying to undermine the age-old checks and balances that the Founding Fathers placed at the center of the Constitution."

But he didn't stop there. He made it very clear that criticism of the Democrats and their filibuster strategy is "un-American."

In his radio appeal, Schumer sought to draw Bush more directly into the fray by urging the president to denounce some conservatives who have used harsh language to criticize the Democrats.

"I am making a heartfelt plea to you, Mr. President. When you came to Washington, you said you wanted to change the climate in D.C.," Schumer said. "Those stating these abhorrent views count themselves as your political allies. One word from you will bring a halt to these un-American statements. That would be a way to strengthen democracy here at home."

So, would you count Senator Reid's statement that Justice Janice Rogers Brown "is a woman who wants to take us back to the Civil War days" as an abhorrent view, or an un-American statement? or is that sort of crap just politics as usual from the Democrat leadership?

Now Senator, I would like you to answer a simple question -- on what basis do you believe the president has the power or authority to "rein in" the speech of any American? That sounds pretty antithetical to the First Amendment to me. Does the Senator propose setting up a "Senate Un-American Activities Commitee" to police these organizations -- thereby adding "Schumerism" to the political vocabulary of the United States?

Frankly, Chuckles, in the end I don't give a rat's ass if President Bush does as you ask on this matter (not that I think he will give your whine more than a moment's notice) -- I'll exercise my rights as an American to denounce you and your ilk. Your attempt to invoke the heavy hand of government censorship against your critics and political opponents is reprehensible -- and, might I also add, abhorrent and un-American.

Additional commentary from Right-Sided and Red State.

(Hat Tip -- Americablog)

Posted by: Greg at 08:24 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 492 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Chuck Schumer is correct about one thing -- Bush does bring the climate of extremism into the society. You can see the FDA banning gay people from donating the sperm?

You can see Medicaid being cut down. You can see the extremists growing in the Armed Forces -- look at US Air Force Academy!

The extremism is growing without any challenges in this country, with the support of Bush.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Sat May 7 11:53:53 2005 (nWmj6)

2 Yeah, I do see extremism at the Air Force Academy -- in the form or secularism being shoved down the throats of religious cadets. Bqnning discussion of religion is censorship -- and un-American.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun May 8 14:52:04 2005 (y/GEB)

3 What?! You have to be kidding?! Did you hear about the harassments by these religious fanatics on Jews? Accusing them for Jesus' death?

Wake up and smell the coffee.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Sun May 8 20:37:49 2005 (nWmj6)

4 Look at my last statement.

Banning religious speech is censorship -- and un-American.

I stand by that position -- no matter how screwed up the theology of those relative few who would accuse all Jews of being responsible for the death of Jesus.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun May 8 22:43:25 2005 (y/GEB)

5 Exactly, RWR. That's the beauty of Freedom of Speech. For those who cannot tolerate such expression and don't want opposite views heard, they're no better than Hitler. But vituperative hate speech a la "let's go bomb churches" type of speech is another matter. It's called "incitement" to engage in illegal acts and loss of innocent human life.

Not smart.

Posted by: mcconnell at Tue May 10 11:11:40 2005 (LmcbS)

6 Still the freedom of speech applies to that, like it or not. I'm so glad that the Head Coach of Air Force Academy Men's Basketball left for Richmond -- at least, another crumbling piece in Air Force Academy.

I do not see any comments about the Church excommunicating parishoners who voted for Kerry in North Carolina recently. That Church should be taxed because it is affilitated itself with the politics.

Of course, you won't touch it, RWR.

R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Tue May 10 16:14:14 2005 (nWmj6)

7 I've left it alone because I've not been able to figure out what is going on.

Plus, I don't believe in the law that takes away the tax exemption. Given that the power to tax is the power to destroy, I believe that churches are tax exempt due to the First Amendment, since Congress has no authority to destroy a church.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue May 10 22:50:23 2005 (MAreW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
11kb generated in CPU 0.0055, elapsed 0.0125 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0086 seconds, 36 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]