June 04, 2006

No Personal Responsibility Zone

Let me begin with a truly shocking true story.

Nearly a decade ago, I had a 18-year-old high school senior inform me that her current (THIRD!) pregnancy was the fault of the state of Texas. After all, she had wanted her tubes tied following the birth of her second child (at age 16)-- but Medicaid wouldn't cover it for a female under 21 unless she had three children. It wasn't like she was going to quit having sex with her boyfriend (they lived together at his parent's house, along with their child and her child by another guy, born when she was 14) -- so it was clearly the state's fault.

I couldn't help but think of this young woman when I read this opinion piece from the Washington Post by the anonymous "Dana L.".

The conservative politics of the Bush administration forced me to have an abortion I didn't want. Well, not literally, but let me explain.

I am a 42-year-old happily married mother of two elementary-schoolers. My husband and I both work, and like many couples, we're starved for time together. One Thursday evening this past March, we managed to snag some rare couple time and, in a sudden rush of passion, I failed to insert my diaphragm.

The next morning, after getting my kids off to school, I called my ob/gyn to get a prescription for Plan B, the emergency contraceptive pill that can prevent a pregnancy -- but only if taken within 72 hours of intercourse. As we're both in our forties, my husband and I had considered our family complete, and we weren't planning to have another child, which is why, as a rule, we use contraception. I wanted to make sure that our momentary lapse didn't result in a pregnancy.

The receptionist, however, informed me that my doctor did not prescribe Plan B. No reason given. Neither did my internist. The midwifery practice I had used could prescribe it, but not over the phone, and there were no more open appointments for the day. The weekend -- and the end of the 72-hour window -- was approaching.

But I needed to meet my kids' school bus and, as I was pretty much out of options -- short of soliciting random Virginia doctors out of the phone book -- I figured I'd take my chances and hope for the best. After all, I'm 42. Isn't it likely my eggs are overripe, anyway? I thought so, especially since my best friend from college has been experiencing agonizing infertility problems at this age.

Weeks later, the two drugstore pregnancy tests I took told a different story. Positive. I couldn't believe it.

Got that. Dana was not responsible enough to use her birth control and was too busy to to bother looking for another doctor or -- lest we put too fine a point on it -- go slumming at the ER, so she made a choice to take risk a pregnancy. So the resulting pregnancy was the fault of. . . the Bush administration!

We then get all the ranting about right-wingers, religion seeping into American politics and government and the difficulty in procuring a feticide. This highly-educated professional woman (she's a lawyer) who made a number of choices that resulted in a pregnancy, like my former student, simply refuses to take responsibility for those choices. She has to find someone else to blame so that she can be the victim in the story.

A decade ago, I responded to my student by telling her that unless she could truthfully claim that a team of Texas Rangers kicked open her door and held her in place while then-Gov george W. Bush personally impregnated her, it was not the state of Texas fault that she was pregnant.

I offer the same response to Dana L. -- unless you can claim that the Secret Service held you down while President George W. Bush personally impregnated you, it is not the Bush administration's fault that you got pregnant and needed to have your unborn child killed.

And remember, Dana, Plan B in your case still would have been an abortion -- so don't kid yourself about what you were seeking.

You just wanted it to be earlier, neater, and easier on your conscience -- the ultimate rejection of responsibility.

UPDATE: I've gotten a couple of emails wanting to know what happened to my former student. About six weeks after our conversation, she delivered a healthy baby boy -- her third child delivered at expense of the taxpayers of the state of texas. And true to its policies, Medicaid paid for her tubes to be immediately tied. I'll let you decide if that was a net loss or net gain for the taxpayers.

Others writing on this piece include Maryland Conservatarian, appletree, Creature of Mad Enthusiasms, Villainous Company, jonquil, Suburban Guerrilla, The Reality-Based Community, Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler

OPEN TRACKBACKING TO Conservative Cat, Samantha Burns, Stuck on Stupid, Bacon Bits, Adam's Blog, Lil Duck Duck, Third World County, Passionate American, Blue Star Chronicle, 7 Deadly Sins (twice), Uncooperative Blogger, Stop the ACLU, Wizbang!

Posted by: Greg at 02:56 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 858 words, total size 7 kb.

1 I'm afraid you've been misinformed about how Plan B works. See here for an explanation as to how it works. It's not an abortion.

Also, you say that Dana L. "was not responsible enough to use her birth control." But she was responsible enough to use birth control. The birth control she tried to obtain is called Plan B. And it was unavailable to her because of the policies of the Bush administration.

Don't kid yourself. If Plan B had been available, there would have been no abortion in this case.

You also left a crucial bit of information:

I’m still in good health, but unlike the last time I was pregnant, nearly a decade ago, I’m now taking three medications. One of them, for high cholesterol, is in the Food and Drug Administration’s Pregnancy Category X — meaning it’s a drug you shouldn’t take if you’re expecting or even planning to get pregnant. I worried because the odds of having a high-risk pregnancy or a baby born with serious health issues rise significantly after age 40.

Why do you suppose the FDA tells women not to take this cholesterol medication if they're pregnant? I don't know which medication she was taking, but users of Zocor are told not to take it while pregnant because it can harm the fetus.

So if Dana L. should have taken the pregnancy to term, should she have stopped taking her medication? Are we now at the point that we will withhold birth control from married women, then force them to endanger their own health in order to avoid endangering the fetus? Or is it OK to endanger the fetus by taking cholesterol medication?

Posted by: gordo at Sun Jun 4 10:13:32 2006 (WhbrQ)

2 I would beg to differ with you on a couple of points.

1) If it prevents implantation of a fertilized egg, it is an abortion. Anything intentional act that prevents that implantation is an abortion.

2) No her form of birth control, by her own admission, was a diaphragm, which she was not responsible enough to use by her own admission. Plan B, by its very nature, is generally used by those who made a choice to have unprotected sex (sexual assault victims being the only plausible exception to that statement).

3) The drug was available -- if she had not decided to play pregnancy roulette by stopping at three phone calls. She could have made those couple of extra phone calls -- or gone to the ER. I bet that she could have gotten Plan B through that same Planned parenthood center where she had her child dismembered and sucked into a sink. I guess that you will consider Plan B unavailable until you can get it from a gumball machine on every street corner.

4) Don't get me started on drug interactions -- it is a major part of why my wife and I cannot even attempt to have children.

5) No one said anything about forcing anyone to do anything.

6) When push comes to shove -- it is still by her own choice that she wound up pregnant, not that of the Bush administration.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Jun 4 10:32:01 2006 (E9VZb)

3 gordo

Did you actually..you know... READ the article?

This female must have spent all of 30 minutes max on the phone to get a prescription.

3 phone calls. 30 minutes.

Makes you wonder how much time she shops for shoes or gets her nails done.

Dana does not ONCE own one bit of her own role in this tragic farce. She wants to play hide the salami with her husband and then can't be bothered with ANY of the consequences

She's a lawyer? Hell, where did she find her barcard, in a box of Cracker Jacks?

Posted by: Darleen at Sun Jun 4 12:02:45 2006 (rvX7J)

4 Anti-choicers conveniently ignore Christ's silence on birth control. His women followers relied on Jerusalem's RU-486-like Queen Anne's Lace weed to avoid divorce-causing smelly bladder and bowel childbirth tears (fistulas). Early Christianity was hijacked by pedophile heretics who demonized "selfish baby-killers" for criminal self-serving reasons. This led to torching 9 million women for stretch marks and cellulite "proof of witchcraft." The Church also pronounced sinful sex on Sundays as the cause of all birth defects. It's time couples put their health and dignity before the matricidal fraud of pedophile preachers and GOP adulterers. If abortion is good enough Henry Hyde's mistresses, it is good enough for all women not servicing GOP hypocrites.

Posted by: Mary at Sun Jun 4 17:37:36 2006 (QvXDz)

5 An anti-life, anti-Catholic/anti-Christian bigot like Mary certainly makes herself easy to dismiss.

I bet she thinks the DaVinci Code is holy writ and the best source for all revelation.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Jun 4 23:18:27 2006 (+zYcx)

6 What if she were using responsible birth control? Condoms break and the pill isn't 100 percent effective.

The issue isn't if she was or was not responsible it's that she was denied safe and legal medication that most likely would have prevented an abortion.

Posted by: stretchmarks at Mon Jun 5 01:21:40 2006 (G6MuU)

7 What if she had been using responsible birth control? Condoms break and the pill isn't 100 percent effective.

The issue isn't if she was or was not responsible it's that she was denied safe and legal medication that most likely would have prevented an abortion.

Posted by: stretchmarks at Mon Jun 5 01:22:40 2006 (G6MuU)

8 When a man and a women have intercourse and the women gets pregnant there is only two responsible people, you guessed it!!! Anything other than this is an excuse. And giving an excuse for a excuse is not a valid argument. There is no blame here, there is only the course that nature takes. Be it wanted or not. If for some reason you want to change the outcome and you fail, so be it. There is no reason to blame someones lazyness either for this is just another stupid argument. End the argument and don't add to the stupidity.

Posted by: Rich at Mon Jun 5 02:44:16 2006 (QpZ6z)

9 Rhymes--

Plan B doesn't work by preventing implantation. It works by preventing eggs from being released from the ovary. It's not abortion.

Her preferred method of birth control was a diaphragm, but since she did try to use an alternative method (plan B), it's not accurate to say that she wasn't responsible enough to use birth control.

You and Darleen make much of the amount of time that was spent trying to obtain birth control. But that misses the bottom line, doesn't it? We know from experience that the more difficult birth control is to aquire and use, the less it will be used.

So the predictable consequence of the administration's actions are that more women will have abortions. You can attack Dana L. for being irresponsible if you like, but to be consistent you also ought to hold the president responsible for the predictable consequences of his policies.

Posted by: gordo at Mon Jun 5 03:57:34 2006 (WhbrQ)

10 Dana L is a classic example of the massive erosian of personal accountability infecting our country. It seemed to me her litany of excuses was really an attempt to assuage adeep seeded guilt that tragically she is unable to acknowledge. I hope her husband is better equipped to model responsibility in decision making to their children as Dana L clearly will fail to ingrain this essential character building tool in them! Note to Dana - remove the log from your own eye BEFORE you point out the speck in another's...

Posted by: Annie at Mon Jun 5 04:10:58 2006 (kztTs)

11 Dana L is a classic example of the massive erosian of personal accountability infecting our country. It seemed to me her litany of excuses was really an attempt to assuage adeep seeded guilt that tragically she is unable to acknowledge. I hope her husband is better equipped to model responsibility in decision making to their children as Dana L clearly will fail to ingrain this essential character building tool in them! Note to Dana - remove the log from your own eye BEFORE you point out the speck in another's...

Posted by: ann e at Mon Jun 5 04:13:10 2006 (kztTs)

12 I was going to correct your misinformation about Plan B, but I saw that someone above had already done that.

I don't think she was blaming the administration for her pregnancy, which she acknowledged was due to her own actions, but for the fact that rather than allowing her to access reliable tools to prevent implantation of the sperm in the first place, the administration forced her to wait until her only remaining option was what the administration purportedly opposes—abortion. If Bush opposes abortions, why does he favor policies that force women to have them?

Had she had the baby, it would almost certainly not have been healthy. She was 42 years old and on 3 medications that posed a known risk for birth defects.

Neither liberals nor conservatives want the abortion rate in this country to be as high as it is. The difference is that liberals want to give women access to the tools to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place, and recognize that not only is this the path to making abortion a rare procedure, but it is also essential in securing women's role as equal to men in society.

Posted by: Riva at Mon Jun 5 08:10:39 2006 (1regO)

13 Actually, had she had that baby, it almost certainly WOULD have been healthy. While her age and her medication raise the possibility of problems, the increased risk of problems would still leave her with a 95-98% chance of a perfectly healthy baby. Given my wife's age, medical history and medications, we have both researched this thoroughly.

Dana, of course, didn't bother doing the testing to find out about that possibility.

And the reality is that by the time she would have goten te Plan B, fertilization had likely taken place -- which means she was pregnant. Now either you are going to tell me that Plan B would have prevented implantation , in which case the drug would have been a chemical abortion (not forced by the administration, but chosen by Dana); or that it would have allowed implantation, in which case the policies of the Bush administration had nothing to do with her pregnancy and subsequent abortion.

As such, neither situation can legitimately be said to be Bush forcing her to have an abortion.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Jun 5 22:46:46 2006 (PEFrQ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0302, elapsed 0.0723 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0489 seconds, 42 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]