It appears that if there is corruption in the Texas courts, it has a big D hanging around its neck.

Mikal Watts of San Antonio, a lawyer and candidate for the Democratic nomination for U.S. senator, has done the reputations of the courts and the trial lawyers no good.

As reported by the Chronicle's R.G. Ratcliffe, in 2001 Watts wrote to opposing counsel claiming that his firm's campaign contributions had won the hearts and minds of the justices on the 13th Court of Appeals, "all good Democrats." If Watts and his firm indeed gave campaign gifts with the expectation of influencing the court's decisions, it would constitute an illegal bribe. If Watts was just making an idle threat to intimidate a defendant in a lawsuit, he behaved unethically.

As a well- and largely self-financed candidate for high office, Watts owes voters an explanation: Does he think his campaign donations influence the outcome of cases? Regardless of the answer, Watts should explain to the voters why his outrageous claim does not violate the public trust and disqualify him from the office he seeks.

We constantly hear local Democrats complain that conservatives donating to judicial races "buys justice" in Harris County and the state of Texas. Will they now demand that these claims be investigated -- and that Watts be censured and any judges who he bought be removed from the Court? Or are they clean court chickenhawks?

Posted by: Greg at 10:32 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.