May 25, 2006
President Bush personally ordered the Justice Department today to seal records seized from the Capitol Hill office of a Democratic congressman, marking a remarkable intervention by the nation's chief executive into an ongoing criminal probe of alleged corruption.The order culminates an escalating constitutional confrontation between the Justice Department and the House of Representatives, where lawmakers have demanded that the FBI return items seized during a Saturday night raid of the office of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.).
In a six-paragraph statement, Bush said he issued the order to give the Justice Department and angry lawmakers more time to work out an agreement on how to resolve the conflict. The materials, which have been described in court filings as two boxes of documents and copies of computer files, will be held by Solicitor General Paul D. Clement, who is not involved in the Jefferson probe, Bush's statement said.
"Our government has not faced such a dilemma in more than two centuries," Bush said. "Yet after days of discussions, it is clear these differences will require more time to be worked out."
I'm willing to forgive policy differences --but this is a case of allowing a spurious claim of Congressional privilege to trump the enforcement of a duly issued search warrant in a felony case. There is nothing here to negotiate and mediate, and this decision indicates that we have a Chief Executive too weak-kneed to allow the Executive and Judicial branches to carry out their Constitutional perogatives lest it imperil his chances of legislative success --even at the cost of permitting public corruption to continue unabated. This is not to say that I will not side with George W. Bush when I believe him to be right, but rather that I will no longer extend to him the presumption that he is right, nor the level of support that I would ordinarily extend to a president of my party. I think this is that big a deal.
Is our existance as a Constitutional Republic firmly rooted in the rule of law at an end?
MORE AT: Captain's Quarters, Sister Toldjah, Pro Cynic, The Anchoress, Webloggin, Blue Crab Boulevard, Strata-Sphere, Kitty Litter, GOPBloggers, Blogs for Bush, Irish Pennants
OPEN TRACKBACKING TO: Sed Vitae, Conservative Cat, Liberal Wrong Wing, Bacon Bits, Adam's Blog, Stop The ACLU, Stuck on Stupid
Posted by: Greg at
01:58 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 434 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Vic at Thu May 25 14:08:35 2006 (vm/OA)
Posted by: ubu at Thu May 25 15:03:47 2006 (aD093)
AMERICA FIRST, BUSH! Stop pandering to the hispanic populace simply because mexicans are the new negroes!
That's right. I went there. Does anyone pay attention to history anymore?
Posted by: Eric Clemmons at Thu May 25 15:06:44 2006 (+LgAZ)
Come on you guys! Pull your head out of your back end and smell the corruption!
Posted by: John Cobarruvias at Thu May 25 17:27:20 2006 (11wtF)
"Geez folks, we are $9Trilion in debt, running a $450B deficit, at an never ending war"
The National debt has only gone down five times since the 1940s. It is not relevant, and never was under Clinton (where it went up, up, up). We are beginning troop drawdown this year (I guess you missed that), starting with the recdcution of 30,000 starting in July. An indication of victory, not defeat.
"our insurance rates have doubled"
What insurance rates? There are literally thousands for all kinds of things. Auto, life, health (mine's gone down...), etc. Specify, and don't project hardships in your own life onto everyone else.
"our cost for a higher education is up by 40%"
Are test scores up? If yes, then it is working. If no, then it proves that spending more on the bill that Ted Kennedy wrote isn't going to fix the problem. Next.
"we are not only disrepected around the world, we are ridiculed"
Poor POOR us. Heaven forbid that not every scumsucking terrorist in the world likes the USA. Who cares, anyway? Do you walk around on eggshells to please every person in your life? What happens if you run afoul of somebody, and (gasp) they don't like you? Change yourself to accomodate them? That seems rather disingenuous, phony and juvenile. America has had enemies for its whole history. Maybe we should've just laid down and let the Brits run everything - they are wise Europeans, after all. Tell us news, not history.
"there is corruption as far as we can smell"
We? Speak for yourself. There has always been corruption in Congress - we just saw William Jefferson stash 90K in a freezer, and then refuse an FBI subopena for eight months. Allan Mollahan had to resign. Harry Reid took the same $$ from Abramoff clients that Hastert did. Throw in the Republican corruption that has actually been proven (not alleged), and you have corruption from both parties.
On the other hand, if you want higher taxes, a stunted economy, more bureaucracy and meddling in your life, more regulations, more race baiting, more pandering, more lying, then by all means vote for the Party of Clinton. If neither option is appealing, sit it out. There will be no third party victory. Good luck with the amazing alternatives.
PS - Bush isn't running in 2008, so don't worry about having to vote for him. :-)
Posted by: Good Lt at Fri May 26 00:48:49 2006 (yT+NK)
And I am not doen with the GOP -- not by a long shot. What I am done with a president who appears almost as adrift in terms of principles as his predecessor,
But in his defense, at least he has a personal moral compass, unlike his predecessor.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri May 26 00:56:20 2006 (DY+YT)
As for being disrespected and ridiculed around the world, I'd like to point out that Fidel Castro and his Communist prison state in Cuba is highly respected. So is Red China with its religious persecution. Any number of third world piss-ant states ruled by dictators who rape their people financially and politically are also viewed as good citizens. On the other hand, the state of Israel , for decades the only functioning democracy in the Middle East, is riducled as a bad guy and targetted for extinction (and its people for extermination) by much of the world. And the US? We are expected to pay for and obey a United Nations that places the world's worst human rights violators in charge of human rights policies and can't see its way clear to enforce its own policies against any nations other than Israel and the US. My attitude towards such an international community is SCREW 'EM.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri May 26 01:06:58 2006 (DY+YT)
While I'm clearly on the other side of the aisle from you, I too am troubled by Bush's interference in this case.
The article you referenced also states the Jefferson had filed a motion with the courts to have the materials locked up "to allow for full briefing and careful consideration by the court of the serious Constitutional issues and the unprecedented circumstances that give rise to this motion."
Why not let the courts decide?
Posted by: Phlip at Fri May 26 01:14:31 2006 (0sNJu)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri May 26 02:44:46 2006 (DY+YT)
Posted by: the anchoress at Fri May 26 07:51:36 2006 (hDwif)
Posted by: Big Dog at Fri May 26 09:13:09 2006 (8BBjT)
but i know exactly what's coming here -- jefferson will be conflated with the false meme that abramoff also gave money to the dems so it's not only a republican scandal. nonsense.
abramoff would blow his own head off rather than give a dime to a democrat, and i think that republicans should be calling for the ouster of anyone with abramoff taint on them to resign today.
i think that all AMERICANS, whatever the stripe, should toss all of these crooks out in november and let the chips fall where they may. we need to let them know that we're their bosses every day, not just on election day.
to that end -- publically fund elections, provide free media access during campaign seasons (local, state, and federal), and get rid of any mechanical vote tabulators. if canada can do it by hand count, so can we. our democracy is worth it.
Posted by: dave. at Fri May 26 16:53:36 2006 (67LmV)
1) Abramoff & his clients did give bunches of cash to Dems. It is public record. Look it up.
2) Dems called upon him only to resign from his committee seat, not from Congress. That is a big difference.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat May 27 02:54:44 2006 (DscAl)
and i'm more talking about democrats NOT in congress. i'm talking about pundits and folks on the street. we want this crap out now. on both sides of the aisle. i don't give a shit what pelosi says. i'm not going to even try to defend the democratic congressional leadership.
but it's nice to see your party finally speaking up for checks and balances. even if it's selective, it's a good start.
Posted by: dave. at Sat May 27 06:51:55 2006 (67LmV)
Posted by: test at Mon Aug 4 00:38:53 2008 (7KLfO)
Posted by: britney porn sex spear tape tube at Mon Aug 4 01:02:22 2008 (9LdCh)
Posted by: label porn at Wed Feb 18 16:29:47 2009 (GGpip)
21 queries taking 0.0088 seconds, 46 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.