January 02, 2007
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., is scheduled to become chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, but only because he agreed when Pelosi previously made clear that she intended him not to waste time on impeachment proceedings against President Bush. But now we learn that Conyers has his own problems with obeying the law.There is so much wrong with the Conyers situation that Pelosi shouldnÂ’t have to think twice about nixing ConyersÂ’ chairmanship. Let us look at how the Conyers scandal epitomizes the ethics mess in the House:
First, releasing its report late on Friday before the New Year’s holiday weekend made it clear that the House “Ethics” Committee intended to minimize public understanding of the Conyers scandal. This is classic Washington Establishment manipulation of the news cycle to insulate itself against public accountability.
Second, Conyers responded to the “Ethics” committee by “accepting responsibility” for a “lack of clarity” in asking aides to work on his re-election campaign while on the official payroll instead of going on a campaign staff, as the law requires, and to do personal chores for him. The allegations came from senior staff members, including a former chief of staff, not interns or other short-term aides who might have questionable motives.
Third, the “Ethics” committee report also concerned a second investigation of Conyers from 2003 on allegations that his aides also worked on the Carol Mosely-Braun presidential campaign and JoAnn Watson’s Detroit City Council race. Would Conyers have applied the same slipshod legal standards to his Bush impeachment effort?
Fourth, the Conyers scandal shows it’s still business as usual for the “Ethics” committee. Pelosi should demand that Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., and Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., the committee leaders who signed off on the Conyers report, be removed permanently from the panel and barred from leadership of other House panels.
Finally, Pelosi should heed former White House chief of staff and ex-congressman Leon Panetta, who said “you can attack one party for having a lack of ethics, but if any of your own members have problems, it dulls the message with the American people, they begin to put everybody in the same box.” In other words, whenever one member of the House has an ethics problem, it damages the credibility of all members of the House, including most especially its most visible leader, the speaker.
So come on, Nancy -- either get rid of this big-time Democrat alligator in the "ethical swamp" or admit that your promises about ethics reform were nothing but empty, partisan rhetoric designed to scare up a few more votes after Democrats ginned up one more scandal involving the GOP.
And for that matter, make sure you take action against Rahm Emanuel, who left House pages at risk by holding back the Foley emails until their release became politically profitable?
The ball is in your court, Nancy -- act, or prove yourself a liar and a hypocrite.
Posted by: Greg at
04:14 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 552 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Zackery at Wed Jan 7 02:27:14 2009 (1dCvn)
Posted by: Sterling at Wed Jan 7 02:56:45 2009 (yEwnL)
Posted by: viagra at Tue Mar 3 00:44:26 2009 (E2Rgd)
Posted by: megan fox fhm at Thu Nov 5 08:44:24 2009 (PZ4uf)
Posted by: ashley tisdale sex at Fri Nov 6 11:24:43 2009 (CfekM)
Posted by: jessica alba exposed at Fri Nov 6 14:14:48 2009 (BxfYA)
Posted by: paris hilton sex at Sat Nov 7 05:13:11 2009 (0Br1x)
Posted by: QuickBust at Mon Nov 9 04:49:34 2009 (VUy2/)
Posted by: Ayurveda Stop Smoking at Tue Nov 10 10:11:37 2009 (JQSlG)
Posted by: carmen electra gallery at Wed Nov 18 12:32:45 2009 (Jd7ul)
21 queries taking 0.0257 seconds, 39 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.






