May 07, 2005

“Half-Truth Harry” Reid Insults President, Turns High School Class Into Partisan Platform

Senator Harry Reid needs to resign. He has shown himself not to have the temperament and the judgment necessary to serve in the US Senate, much less to be the leader of the minority party.

Speaking to a classroom full of high school juniors, the Nevada Democrat insulted the president of the United States.

"The man's father is a wonderful human being," Reid said in response to a question about President Bush's policies. "I think this guy is a loser.”

Inappropriate, Senator, in what was supposed to be a non-partisan educational setting. That you would even consider making that comment shows that you are deficient in judgment. We don’t care that you called Karl Rove to apologize later – the comment should have never been made.

And as if that wasnÂ’t enough, you engaged in additional character assassination against the PresidentÂ’s judicial nominees.

Reid took students through a primer of the five most-disputed judicial nominees, arguing some were opposed to the 1973 Roe v. Wade case legalizing abortion. He charged others with trying to dismantle government programs like Social Security.
"I don't want them. I think they're bad people," Reid said of the nominees
He described California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown, one of the Bush nominees Republicans will probably float first for approval, as an African-American opposed by the Congressional Black Caucus.
"She is a woman who wants to take us back to the Civil War days," Reid said.

Really, Senator Reid, this black woman, the daughter of a sharecropper raised in the segregated Democrat-run South wants to recreate the days when blacks were slaves? Would you care to offer even a shred of evidence to support that outrageous slander, sir? And which of them has said they would try to dismantle Social Security? As for Roe, its overturn would leave the decision on the legality of abortion to the states – precisely the same place you say that the decision should be on recognizing homosexual marriage. Not one of these nominees is unqualified – at least not according to the ABA, the approval of which you folks on the Democrat side argued was the gold standard for judicial nominees in 2001 – so there is no legitimate basis for opposing them. I somehow bet you left that little bit out when you were presenting your so-called facts to these students.

But there will be no Reid resignation, and no denunciation of the Senate minority leader by the Democrats. That is because Senate Democrats donÂ’t have any ethics when it comes to this issue. They want what they want and will get it any way they can, even if it means raping the Constitution to get it. And if it means letting Half-Truth Harry Reid skate again, then so be it.

Additional commentary fom Blogs For Bush, Hard Starboard, Red State, Iowa Voice, The Mighty Righty, and Say Anything.

UPDATE -- The White House responds.

"The president has worked to change the tone in Washington by elevating the discourse and reaching out to find common ground to get things done," [White House spokesman Scott] McClellan said.

"It has been a challenge and it has been disappointing that we haven't been able to make more progress on that front. I think the American people want their elected leaders to elevate the discourse and to reach out across partisan lines and that's what the president will continue to do," he said.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Harry -- and you too, Chuckles.

Posted by: Greg at 05:55 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 605 words, total size 5 kb.

1 harry reid is a traitor, a total anti american no ideas kind of a species. how dare he call our president a loser. he is totally out of line not to mention disrespectful. how do you think our troops feel when they hear this from back home. harry reid is disgusting and i am ashamed to even have him as a representative of our great country. he needs to go...go....go

Posted by: helen rudd at Sat May 7 10:18:04 2005 (FRQPq)

2 Way to go, Harry Reid -- Bush is big-time "L" -- you heard about the stories from the moderate Republicans who tried to reason with Bush and Bush refused and said for them to get out of the Oval Office. Imagine this! What a loser! A guy refused to reason and compromise is a big-time "L". Helen, please go to the corner and stay there for 365 days. R-

Posted by: Me is the Ridor at Sat May 7 11:55:27 2005 (nWmj6)

3 I see their is a vigorous debate going on here... Maybe somebody actually gives a shit. But, I doubt it. "But there will be no Reid resignation, and no denunciation of the Senate minority leader by the Democrats. That is because Senate Democrats donÂ’t have any ethics when it comes to this issue. They want what they want and will get it any way they can, even if it means raping the Constitution to get it. And if it means letting Half-Truth Harry Reid skate again, then so be it." And to think, this coming from someone in the same party as Tom Delay... "Raping the constitution" such strong language. Look, if you must call Harry Reid "half-truth," then at least be so kind as to call a spade a spade and give George, I-don't-know-the-meaning-of-truth, Bush a clever moniker as well.

Posted by: shawayman at Sat May 7 16:15:43 2005 (SUB6J)

4 The real loser is Reid who couldn't keep it non-partisan while at a High school. When people (ie. Senators et al) do this, then it shows how desperate they are hoping for a public spotlight to catch this in an attemtp to draw President Bush into the fray. Sort of like throwing snowball at you on purpose and then say, "Oh, I'm sorry." People aren't that dumb, except, maybe, of course, Harry Reid. It's an ignominy for Harry Reid.

Posted by: mcconnell at Sun May 8 03:39:33 2005 (3khTv)

5 But I DO have a clever moniker for him -- it is "Mr. President".

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun May 8 10:42:12 2005 (y/GEB)

6 But, of course. Tis shows the level of maturity and respect to say "Mr President" coming from any Senators, Congressperson, et al and doing so otherwise would indicate a certain infantilism on their behalf...especially right in front of a bunch of high school kids.

Posted by: mcconnell at Sun May 8 11:58:20 2005 (LmcbS)

7 According to Wednesday's (09/21/05) NY Times article by Stolberg and Kirkpatrick, why is one of the reasons for Senator Reid's opposition to Judge Roberts' nomination the fact that he used the term "illegal amigos?"

Posted by: Nathan at Tue Sep 20 17:53:28 2005 (2jmzL)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
12kb generated in CPU 0.0102, elapsed 0.0197 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0127 seconds, 36 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]