May 02, 2007

Dems Blink On Iraq Bill

Maybe now they will stop playing politics with military funding.

President Bush and congressional leaders began negotiating a second war funding bill yesterday, with Democrats offering the first major concession: an agreement to drop their demand for a timeline to bring troops home from Iraq.

Democrats backed off after the House failed, on a vote of 222 to 203, to override the president's veto of a $124 billion measure that would have required U.S. forces to begin withdrawing as early as July. But party leaders made it clear that the next bill will have to include language that influences war policy. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) outlined a second measure that would step up Iraqi accountability, "transition" the U.S. military role and show "a reasonable way to end this war."

"We made our position clear. He made his position clear. Now it is time for us to try to work together," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) said after a White House meeting. "But make no mistake: Democrats are committed to ending this war."

Now what someone needs to tell these two idiots is that the issue is not "ending the war" -- because there are lots of terrible ways to do that. No, the only acceptable way to end the war is to do so with VICTORY. As such, artificial calendars for withdrawal are counterproductive. There might be a place for some sort of benchmarks, but not if they provide the enemy with a roadmap for US defeat.

And it is time for all of us to send the Dems that message, loud and clear.

Posted by: Greg at 11:17 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Just to be clear, exactly how long should we stay in Iraq, attempting "victory" in a country where we are involved with a war that is going on around us, instead of against us? At what point are we supposed to say enough? When we achieve "victory"? What if that never comes? Will you be comfortable with staying there until victory if achieved, if it costs us our country?

I'm not, becaue what good is a victory without a country?

Posted by: Brian at Wed May 2 23:29:25 2007 (eMFqF)

2 Victory? What does that mean? Total destruction of Iraqi society and the massacre of millions who want us to leave? You would prefer playing politics with people's lives, I suppose. This isn't about terrorism, it's about occupation. OUT NOW!!

Posted by: ron at Thu May 3 00:14:34 2007 (IEXIY)

3

Posted by: Sasha at Tue Oct 7 07:38:41 2008 (O9rQv)

Posted by: balabo3_fq at Thu Nov 27 21:18:57 2008 (TH9pw)

Posted by: balabo3_zu at Fri Nov 28 06:14:55 2008 (UIWyl)

Posted by: jack3_ko at Thu Jan 15 15:09:37 2009 (hD9C7)

Posted by: maxx-vg at Thu Jan 15 16:17:01 2009 (jt/kr)

Posted by: jack3_xs at Thu Jan 15 20:52:42 2009 (SOWYS)

Posted by: maxx-bx at Fri Jan 16 06:59:22 2009 (+rLp9)

Posted by: jack3_ki at Fri Jan 16 13:24:17 2009 (SOWYS)

Posted by: maxx-tl at Wed Jan 21 16:51:17 2009 (T2hvm)

Posted by: jack3_nx at Wed Jan 21 18:38:33 2009 (1dVeX)

Posted by: jack3_np at Thu Apr 30 01:31:46 2009 (+Q0e0)

Posted by: maxx-gw at Mon May 4 12:25:09 2009 (gtg9W)

15 wqjjfcp cgpeiba gyhmcxa http://iivdxwm.com

Posted by: Hello at Mon May 4 12:40:44 2009 (ZiOjt)

Posted by: jack3_rm at Tue May 19 06:53:16 2009 (Jm0Dh)

Posted by: maxx-of at Tue May 19 08:38:00 2009 (olrOF)

Posted by: maxx-ig at Tue May 19 14:53:46 2009 (FKa4h)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
14kb generated in CPU 0.0068, elapsed 0.0166 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.011 seconds, 47 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]