January 29, 2007
It will be an uphill fight, but Houston Sen. Dan Patrick on Monday filed one of his longtime priorities, a constitutional amendment lowering the annual cap on homestead reappraisals from 10 percent to 3 percent.He also filed a related proposal to limit appraisal increases on vacation homes and other nonhomestead residential properties to 10 percent a year. At present, there aren't any limits on how much those properties can be reappraised from year to year.
As a conservative talk show radio host, the Republican freshman senator has long advocated lower limits on appraisals, a key ingredient in rising property taxes.
But a lower statewide appraisal limit wasn't recommended by a task force appointed by Gov. Rick Perry to study the issue because the chairman, Dallas businessman Tom Pauken, didn't believe the amendment can muster the necessary two-thirds votes in the House and the Senate.
Now I agree with Pauken -- this bill is unlikely to get the 2/3 vote necessary for the amendment to go to the people. However, it is important that this bill be filed and voted upon by the legislature. There has been a growing discontent over property taxes the last several years, and legislative stonewalling on the issue has been the obstacle to meaningful reform that will allow Texans to keep their homes. We deserve to know which legislators are for the taxpayer, and which ones are for the right of local governments to take an ever-increasing portion of our paychecks.
And for those of you who wonder why this is a big issue down here, consider this example. My property taxes for my very modest home run around $2500. With the 10% annual appraisal cap, they could double to $5000 by 2014. Each year the increase eats up every penny of my annual pay raise under my school district's current salary schedule -- and by 2022 would outstrip the raises on the current salary schedule by a rate of $2 for every $1 in pay raise. And if you stop to think about it, for Texans on a fixed income such increases can drive them right out of the houses they have owned for decades and in which they have raised families.
We need this appraisal cap now -- and if we don't get it, we need to know which legislators to vote out in 2008, regardless of party label.
Posted by: Greg at
11:21 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 472 words, total size 3 kb.
As I have stated many times, property tax is the means whereby government is able to confiscate private property. The idea that we actually own anything is curious at best since we are forced to eternally pay for the privilege of continued use, not ownership, if we intend to remain attached to our property. This insidious cycle goes without too many seeing the end result, sort of the old adage of how to cook a frog by slight increases in temperature until he’s cooked. The fact remains that by giving permission to government to confiscate property based on an imposed tax, one that allegedly was intended to support the community’s desires of better schools, utilities, roads and other common services; we have abandoned the hard fought for right to actually own property.
Posted by: T F Stern at Tue Jan 30 04:04:32 2007 (z1IoH)
Posted by: ellaelax-ep at Wed Jan 21 08:32:09 2009 (1dVeX)
21 queries taking 0.0184 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.