November 02, 2005

Black Dems Call Racial Abuse of Blacks Acceptable – If They Are Republicans

Well, racism is this year’s black in politics – as long as it is directed at uppity black men and women who think for themselves and don’t subscribe to the identity politics of the Democrat Party.

Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate are fair because he is a conservative Republican.

Such attacks against the first black man to win a statewide election in Maryland include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an "Uncle Tom" and depicting him as a black-faced minstrel on a liberal Web log.

Operatives for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) also obtained a copy of his credit report -- the only Republican candidate so targeted.

But black Democrats say there is nothing wrong with "pointing out the obvious."

"There is a difference between pointing out the obvious and calling someone names," said a campaign spokesman for Kweisi Mfume, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and former president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

Mfume, a long-time Uncle Tom for the Party of Slavery and Segregation is thereby arguing that such racial slurs disguised as political commentary are appropriate if the speaker believes them to be the truth.

Similarly, at least one Democrat Aunt Jemima from the Maryland House of Delegates resorted to slave imagery to describe the politics of Lt. Gov Steele.

Delegate Salima Siler Marriott, a black Baltimore Democrat, said Mr. Steele invites comparisons to a slave who loves his cruel master or a cookie that is black on the outside and white inside because his conservative political philosophy is, in her view, anti-black.

"Because he is a conservative, he is different than most public blacks, and he is different than most people in our community," she said. "His politics are not in the best interest of the masses of black people."

Gee, Salima, which is less in the best interests of blacks – conservative politics or the notion that thinking and believing differently from the majority is harmful to blacks? Is following the crowd a black virtue, or will it take independent thought and independent action to help the black community advance. In short, do you endorse the freedom to think, speak, and believe as one sees fit, or do you demand the slavery of conformity?

And there is, of course, the racial abuse of Lt. Gov. Steele by SteppinÂ’ Fetchit Gilliard.

But then again, why should we be surprised that the prominent blacks in the Democrat Party are trotted out to sling the slurs for their liberal overseers? They serve the role of slave catchers, punishing those who seek to escape the liberal plantation to discourage others from thinking about freedom.

Oh, and by the way – if you take offense at this satirical piece which makes use of these repulsive racist terms as a means of pointing out the hypocrisy of the Left, please give me one logical, principled reason why their use by the groveling Democratic House Negroes is acceptable but mine is not?

UPDATE -- Well, Mfume seems to be trying to parse his statements in such a way as to condemn that which he yesterday approved -- but other top Dems in Maryland think racial slurs are fine and dandy.

Posted by: Greg at 04:24 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 583 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I'll tell you what assclown, the moment you disown the racism of Michelle Malkin, and other right wing pundits, not to mention the racist statement by Britt Hume to Juan Williiams: "Somebody ought to hose you down" (nice Bull Connor imagery that) I'll begin to think about listening to your rants... well maybe not, since you'll never know the indignity of being passed over by a cab, because of your skin color, or the joy of being stopped in your auto for "DWB" (Driving While Back).

Posted by: EffU at Thu Nov 3 14:21:49 2005 (F+lBg)

2 Actually, I am unaware of Ms. Malkin or any other conservative pundit being a raist. As for the Hume comment, you are really stretching that one to make it racial, as it refers to cooling an angry individual down not race. And actually, I have been stopped for Driving While White in the neighborhood where I work aftr staying late for an athletic event, and have been passed over for job consideration because of my deficient melanin level.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 3 15:28:48 2005 (wfdL5)

3 Are you totally stupid, or just willfully ignorant on the subject of Malkin?? She tries constantly to justify internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII, despite the evidence to the contrary provided by the 442nd Regimental Combat Team.

Posted by: EffU at Thu Nov 3 15:37:57 2005 (F+lBg)

4 Actually, you are logic deficient in your previous comment. The superlative record of the 442 RCT after 1943 does nothing to diminish the arguement in favor of internment that existed in late 1941 & early 1942. Based upon what was believed at the time, it was a reasonable decision. One need not be racist to agree with the military and political authorities of the day. It is no different that arguing that the internment of all Muslims in the US following 9/11 would have been appropriate -- it would have been, though it would not have been the best or wisest course, given the threat of future attacks and the existing intelligence on future attacks. That we now know, after the fact, that such attacks never came does nothing to diminish the legitimacy of the 9/12/2001 argument for internment. After all, we are not clairvoyant.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 3 17:13:38 2005 (kx3Gk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
10kb generated in CPU 0.0056, elapsed 0.0129 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0089 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]