October 09, 2005
Houston Mayor Bill White took no official stance but suggested the amendment is divisive."As mayor, I avoid commenting on state and federal laws and policies I do not influence," White said. "I intend to vote 'no' on the proposed state constitutional amendment to protest its use as a wedge issue."
Gee -- how is it divisive to pass a law that is overwhelmingly supported by virtually every demographic group in the state of Texas? Isn't the division actually being cause by those who would impose their values on the state of Texas through the courts, against the will of the people of Texas? You know, those who seek to force the overwhelming majority of Texans to act contrary to their religious beliefs for the benefit of no more than 5%?
Despite the Chronicle's attempt to paint the issue as divisive, by this time next mont it will be clear that Texans are united in opposition to homosexual marriage. -- and it will be clear who is sowing division.
Oh, and by the way, don't forget that there are nine proposed amendments on the November ballot. You can find them here.
Posted by: Greg at
12:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
19 queries taking 0.0083 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.