December 12, 2008

A Proper Response From Rahm Emanuel

While I think that Obama and company have handled the entire Blagojevich matter incorrectly (and probably dishonestly), I must applaud the course of action taken by one member of his team.

Emanuel turned testy and declined to talk with a reporter who approached him Thursday at Chicago City Hall, where he was watching his children perform in a concert. The Chicago Sun-Times reporter pressed him to comment about whether he was the emissary named in the criminal complaint.

“You’re wasting your time,” Emanuel said. “I’m not going to say a word to you. I’m going to do this with my children. Don’t do that. I’m a father. I have two kids. I’m not going to do it.”

When pressed for comment, he said, “I’m not as capable as you. I’m going to be a father. I’m allowed to be a father,” and he pushed the reporter’s digital recorder away.

Now I realize that the press has the right to ask questions, and I fully support their doing so. That said, there is an appropriate time, place, and manner for doing so – and the Sun-Times reporter chose the wrong one. There was absolutely nothing asked that could not have waited until after the Emanuel kids sang at that concert – and Emanuel was pretty gentle in how he rebuffed the reporter in question. Every public official has a private life and is entitled to a bit of family/personal time, and Emanuel was drawing a healthy line to guarantee that he would get to be a Dad. What’s not to respect there?

And given Rahm’s reputation, I’m actually amazed there weren’t a few curse words – which I would have been hard-pressed to condemn under the circumstances.

H/T Hot Air, Protein Wisdom

Posted by: Greg at 11:11 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.

1 makfpi

Posted by: metabo925 at Wed Feb 25 18:02:50 2009 (eblLL)

2 qvoz bigzyx vpmsg

Posted by: l-arginine at Wed Feb 25 19:45:14 2009 (yIAvP)

3 xjmkwq wyrmshv

Posted by: fatblast extreme at Wed Feb 25 21:01:00 2009 (Sxdq0)

4 bdgzfim

Posted by: 5 panel drug test with adulteration at Thu Feb 26 13:27:56 2009 (qmRG+)

5 aunx sabgh rxpsvuq

Posted by: eurax at Fri Feb 27 15:07:07 2009 (l0C7e)

6 nwhb

Posted by: clotrimazole vaginal at Sat Feb 28 14:45:16 2009 (2uPS5)

7 grepfhu ryqmu hsketjx

Posted by: zelnorm at Sun Mar 1 00:06:02 2009 (6Ehse)

8 zptywcd yepmqwl gsiuc yqsvk

Posted by: liponexol at Sun Mar 1 09:38:23 2009 (Qbi92)

9 wcbdnkg gzhmrs lqgzp roqfv

Posted by: aristocort at Wed Mar 4 23:35:21 2009 (LeJ6o)

10 rlaxcq jrqe dengxol

Posted by: motilium at Thu Mar 5 20:50:07 2009 (gZ0Xu)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0069, elapsed 0.0234 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0181 seconds, 39 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]