April 13, 2009

And Why Should They Support Him?

Yes, NY Governor David Paterson is black. So what? Does that mean he ought to have the automatic support of African-Americans in New York?

In a sign of just how far Mr. PatersonÂ’s fortunes have fallen, the governor now faces growing doubts from a group that has been among his most loyal: black elected officials, clergy members and voters.

It is a remarkable turnaround for a man whose ascension to the governorÂ’s office just over a year ago set off a swell of pride and joy in black communities. Mr. Paterson became New YorkÂ’s first black governor and, along with Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, is one of only two in the country.

Now set aside the question of the tendency of blacks to support Democrats, and issues of racial pride. Why does Paterson deserve the support of black elected officials, clergy, and voters? What has he done to earn that support other than take office after the fall of his predecessor in a sex scandal? Has he done anything to significantly improve the lives of African-Americans in the state – or of New Yorkers in general, which should be the more important criteria? Shouldn’t competence and accomplishment be the basis for support rather than skin color and heritage?

Posted by: Greg at 09:41 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.

1 which should be the more important criteria? ShouldnÂ’t competence and accomplishment be the basis for support rather than skin color and heritage?

Posted by: Trudie Ferraro at Mon Sep 10 00:34:33 2012 (IYzRT)

2 which should be the more important criteria? ShouldnÂ’t competence and accomplishment be the basis for support rather than skin color and heritage?




http://www.meest.us/



Posted by: Diamond Faison at Fri Sep 14 00:48:10 2012 (rZupB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
6kb generated in CPU 0.004, elapsed 0.0118 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.009 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]