Oh, wait -- that's a constant occurrence for the old bat anyway.

But the latest report from Iraq makes the apologist for all things jihadi look particularly foolish and biased -- civilian deaths are falling in a dramatic fashion due to the surge.

The number of Iraqis killed last month fell to 718, an Associated Press tally showed, the lowest monthly death toll since just before the 2006 bombing of a Shiite shrine provoked a vicious cycle of retaliatory sectarian violence.

The figures come as the military says violence has fallen to levels not seen in nearly two years, while acknowledging that Iraqis are still dying in unacceptable numbers.

* * *

It was the third consecutive monthly decline in the death toll of Iraqi civilians and security forces since August, when a massive suicide bombing targeting minority Yazidis in northern Iraq helped push the figure to at least 1,956.

Some 500 are thought to have perished in the bombing of the Yazidis.

At least 1,023 Iraqis were killed in September, 911 in October and 718 in November, the lowest since January 2006, when 615 Iraqis were killed, according to figures compiled by the AP from hospital, police and military officials, as well as accounts from reporters and photographers. Insurgent deaths were not included. Other counts differ and some have given higher civilian death tolls.

The number of U.S. troop deaths also declined for the sixth consecutive month, with at least 37 recorded in November, according to an AP tally based on military figures. That was the lowest number since March 2006, when 31 American service members died.

The U.S. military has said the decline in the number of deadly attacks is largely due to a troop buildup this summer of some 30,000 additional troops that enabled them to get closer to the population, as well as a sharp turn of public opinion against al-Qaida in Iraq and other extremist groups.

Yeah, there's that whole problem of success undermining the liberals' preferred policy of surrender and retreat.

But not to worry -- the media shills for the Islamist jihadis are always willing to put matters into perspective with the help for the academic shills for Islamist jihadis. Take this Columbia (of course) professor and UN (of course) official who is anointed an expert on civilian casualties despite working with health and nutrition issues.

An expert on the effect of conflicts on civilians agreed, saying that while the downward trend was positive, it needed to be kept in perspective.

"We've gone from horrific levels of murder to very bad, which is an improvement but not a reason to celebrate," said Richard Garfield, a professor at New York's Columbia University and a manager of health and nutrition for the World Health Organization.

"At these so-called low levels, there's a massive number of excess deaths still likely to occur."

Expert, of course, is AP speak for "someone who agrees with us, regardless of credentials.

Oh, and remember one minor detail, folks -- the civilian dead are being killed by the terrorists, not by Americans. That won't end if we withdraw, and will get worse.

Posted by: Greg at 02:47 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 535 words, total size 3 kb.