March 18, 2007
Email Privacy Compliance
There are just too many laws and regulations that require the security of private data -- especially in emails. These include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA), Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) and many others -- not to mention common sense and best practices. But how do you achieve full Email compliance? Well, that involves specialized software, like this Email compliance package from Borderware.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Speaking as someone in education who has access to a lot of confidential data that is shared over the district email (grades, discipline records, information about special education students), I can only hope that the school and district have a package like this Email compliance software on our server. After all, not only is it legally mandated to protect such information, it is also simply common sense.
Posted by: Greg at
06:20 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is this one of those paid advertisement, without a warning that it should be ignored?
Do you REALLY believe that the laws on private data should be loosened up? After the government has been caught spying on Americans, I think we need stronger laws protecting us from snooping.
Do you REALLY believe that the laws on private data should be loosened up? After the government has been caught spying on Americans, I think we need stronger laws protecting us from snooping.
Posted by: Dan at Mon Mar 19 14:04:30 2007 (IU21y)
2
Acually, Dan, it does have notice -- though a technical glitch did take it away for a time when the mu.nu servers went a bit haywire.
And if you read what I'm saying, it has nothing to do with what you are talking about -- it is about providing protection of confidential information from unauthorized disclosure -- you know, things like your medical records and such when they are being looked at by your insurance co.
And if you read what I'm saying, it has nothing to do with what you are talking about -- it is about providing protection of confidential information from unauthorized disclosure -- you know, things like your medical records and such when they are being looked at by your insurance co.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Mar 19 14:40:41 2007 (qta09)
3
Yeah, when I read your post, it was jumbled, and now that it all appears, it makes much more sense. The way it read last night, it looked like you were complaining that there is too much protection of information. Glad to see that you're not making such a point.
As Rosanne Rosanna Danna would say, "Never mind . . ."
As Rosanne Rosanna Danna would say, "Never mind . . ."
Posted by: Dan at Tue Mar 20 02:54:09 2007 (n1xH/)
6kb generated in CPU 0.0046, elapsed 0.0118 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0088 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
21 queries taking 0.0088 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.