November 16, 2009

On Judicial Confirmations

During the latter part of the Bush years, I complained about the pace of judicial confirmations. Sadly, the GOP in the Senate is now paying back the Democrats in spades for their obstruction of well-qualified Republican nominees by obstructing Democrat nominees. This is in addition to the delays caused by the failure of the Obama Administration to make timely nominations to fill many judicial vacancies and the focus on other legislative priorities by the Democrat leaders of the Senate.

Despite a solid Democratic majority in the Senate, President Obama is on pace to set a record for the fewest judges confirmed during a president's first year in the White House.

So far, only six of Obama's nominees to the lower federal courts have won approval. By comparison, President George W. Bush had 28 judges confirmed in his first year in office, even though Democrats held a narrow majority for much of the year. President Clinton put 27 new judges on the bench in his first year.

The slow pace of approving judges has gotten little attention while Democrats and Republicans have fought over healthcare, the budget and the economic stimulus bill. In mid-summer, Obama and the Democrats also won confirmation for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

* * *

Nationwide, there are 98 vacancies on the federal bench. Obama has 19 nominees who are awaiting votes in the Senate.

Obama's pace of nominating judges is also slower than previous presidents'.

Still, the obstructionism needs to cease. And so I am back to making a proposal that I made a couple of years ago – an amendment to the Constitution that places a time limit on the Senate’s advice and consent function so as to bring judicial nominees to an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor within a reasonable time period. Such an amendment might read something like this one that I cobbled together as a proposal.

PROPOSED JUDICIAL CONFIRMATION AMENDMENT

Section 1 The power to nominate judges to the Supreme Court and all inferior federal courts shall be vested in the President of the United States.

Section 2 Upon the formal submission of the name of a nominee to a judgeship of any federal court to the United States Senate by the President, the Senate shall vote to confirm or not confirm the nominee within 180 days..

Section 3 The Senate may, with a three-fifths vote, extend the time for confirmation by 90 days in order to allow additional inquiry into the fitness of the candidate or in order to permit the Senate to deal with other legislative concerns. Such an extension shall be permitted only one time.

Section 4 The consent of the Senate shall deemed to be given if the Senate fails to reject the nominee within the 180 days mandated under Section 2 of this Article, or within 270 days in the event of an extension of the deadline under Section 3 of this Article.

This is not a Republican issue. This is not a Democrat issue. This is an issue of ensuring the proper administration of justice and the filling of judicial vacancies necessary for that purpose.

Posted by: Greg at 11:37 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 527 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Saying thanks will not just be enough, for the extraordinary lucidity in your writing.


mobile broadband routers

adirondacks

Posted by: raced at Tue Dec 27 10:05:22 2011 (NDxvV)

2 within 270 days in the event of an extension of the deadline under Section 3 of this Article.


menu boards

Posted by: Lena Mcmanus at Tue May 22 04:56:38 2012 (dumA0)

3 first year in office, even though Democrats held a narrow majority for much of the year. President Clinton put 27 new judges on the bench in his first year.



Vail Ski Rentals

Posted by: Cecilia Sylvester at Wed May 23 04:21:25 2012 (ibGrc)

4 Such an amendment might read something like this one that I cobbled together as a proposal.



how to increase height

Posted by: Gretchen Hooks at Wed Jun 20 00:01:22 2012 (O18Q+)

5 The slow pace of approving judges has gotten little attention while Democrats and Republicans have fought over healthcare, the budget and the economic stimulus bill.



urgent care beverly hills

Posted by: Josefina Gomes at Thu Jun 21 01:13:18 2012 (wRBTZ)

6 This is not a Democrat issue. This is an issue of ensuring the proper administration of justice and the filling of judicial vacancies necessary for that purpose.



http://precisionwarehousedesign.com/

Posted by: Shanell Peek at Sat Aug 18 04:18:18 2012 (wVApU)

7 Despite a solid Democratic majority in the Senate, President Obama is on pace to set a record for the fewest judges confirmed during a president's first year in the White House.

Posted by: Jeana Forman at Mon Aug 20 03:58:59 2012 (peyFc)

8 The slow pace of approving judges has gotten little attention while Democrats and Republicans have fought over healthcare, the budget and the economic stimulus bill.

Posted by: Eulalia Sherrod at Tue Aug 21 02:40:06 2012 (8WoGv)

9 v Despite a solid Democratic majority in the Senate, President Obama is on pace to set a record for the fewest judges confirmed during a president's first year in the White House.

Posted by: Geralyn at Sun Aug 26 01:54:56 2012 (QTGNg)

10 This is not a Democrat issue. This is an issue of ensuring the proper administration of justice and the filling of judicial vacancies necessary for that purpose.

Posted by: Loreen Barraza at Mon Sep 3 01:42:12 2012 (nhSig)

11 Nationwide, there are 98 vacancies on the federal bench. Obama has 19 nominees who are awaiting votes in the Senate.

Posted by: Nicky Musser at Tue Nov 6 02:14:49 2012 (bxeWv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
11kb generated in CPU 0.01, elapsed 0.0117 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.005 seconds, 40 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]