October 21, 2006
Now he may have confessed -- hypothetically, of course.
ELEVEN years after O J Simpson walked free from America’s most controversial murder trial, the former star athlete is at the centre of a row over reports that he is being paid $3.5m for an autobiography in which he describes how he “hypothetically” might have murdered his ex-wife and her male friend.
* * * The National Enquirer’s account could not be verified this weekend but the newspaper provided extensive details in a four-page report on what it called a “tell-all blockbuster”. Simpson is said to describe how he “grabbed a knife from a man who accompanied him to Nicole’s home — and moments later found himself covered in blood and looking down on the bodies of Nicole and Ron”.
The other man is identified only as “Charlie”. No mention of an accomplice or witness emerged at either of Simpson’s trials, but according to the book, “Charlie” had earlier paid Simpson a late-night visit and passed on gossip about Brown and other men, prompting Simpson to “explode” in rage.
“Simpson prefaces these key pages by almost half-heartedly claiming that this part of the book is ‘hypothetical’,” the Enquirer reported. Simpson is said to have written that he stormed around to Brown’s Los Angeles home to confront her. He grabbed a knife he kept in his Ford Bronco car, but “Charlie” snatched it away from him.
According to the Enquirer, the book describes a series of arguments between Simpson, Goldman and Brown. Simpson snatched his knife back from “Charlie” and launched into a “blur” of violence.
When he saw the couple lying dead on the pavement, “OJ says he was in a daze, asking himself who’d done it,” the Enquirer reported. “He was still trying to work out what happened when a terrified Charlie whispered ‘Jesus Christ, OJ, what have you done?’” Simpson’s lawyers made no comment on the allegations last week. Other legal sources said there was no danger that Simpson could be prosecuted again for the crimes — however “hypothetical” his confession — under America’s double jeopardy laws forbidding retrial after acquittal.
Granted, this is originally from the National Enquirer, but they have been known to get scoops like this from time to time. And this would explain why OJ Simpson is playing golf rather than looking for the real killer like he promised.
By the way -- might "Charlie" be OJ's old buddy, Al Cowlings?
Posted by: Greg at
02:04 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 474 words, total size 3 kb.
The prosecution did not screw up the case as much as the dominant black jury practised racial revenge in the form of jury nullification.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Tue Oct 24 06:27:18 2006 (P95FD)
And yes, there was a racial component to the verdict as well -- but a better presentation might well mave prevented that.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Oct 24 12:37:35 2006 (wfdL5)
Posted by: lamar at Mon Nov 13 15:09:04 2006 (nuzvA)
How does my race make my opinion any less valid than yours?
Or do you believe that only the view of one of the right hue is acceptable?
If so, I believe the word for your position is"racist".
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Nov 15 12:34:32 2006 (x/sqY)
Posted by: Wernu at Sun Aug 10 01:59:10 2008 (4FXoC)
21 queries taking 0.0113 seconds, 34 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.