More trouble in the dead-tree media.

The top editor of The Los Angeles Times has been forced out for resisting newsroom budget cuts, executives at the paper said Sunday, marking the fourth time in less than three years that the highest-ranking editor or the publisher has left for that reason.

The removal of the editor, James E. OÂ’Shea, by the publisher, David D. Hiller, mirrors the odd spectacle of a little more than a year ago, when the previous publisher, Jeffrey M. Johnson, was fired for refusing to eliminate newsroom jobs as directed by the paperÂ’s owner, the Tribune Company. In each case, a longtime Tribune executive was expected to rein in costs at the paper, but instead sided with the newsroom and lost his job for it.

The departure of Mr. OÂ’Shea appears to contradict statements by Samuel Zell, the Chicago real estate magnate who took over the company last month and is now its chairman and chief executive. Mr. Zell has repeatedly criticized the previous regime of the financially troubled company for trying to improve the bottom line by cutting costs, and he has said that he thinks the path to profit lies in finding new revenue, not paring costs.

Calls to Mr. O’Shea, Mr. Hiller and a spokeswoman for Mr. Zell were not returned. A Tribune spokesman referred inquiries to Nancy Sullivan, a spokeswoman for The Los Angeles Times, who said, “I don’t have any comment for you.”

Fewer readers equals fewer dollars equals fewer staffers. O'Shea couldn't accept that, and so he had to go.

Frankly, papers like the LA Times need to accept that, as part of major media conglomerates, they need to pool their reporting across the sister publications. In that sense, they will operate like local affiliates of the major television networks do, packaging national news with their local reporting -- and sharing their local reporting with other network affiliates.

Posted by: Greg at 06:28 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 325 words, total size 2 kb.