November 05, 2005

HMO Nightmare

Here is a case of an HMO simply abusing the process to the complete disregard of the health of the patient.

Little Jack Zembsch suffers from a very rare form of dwarfism that will likely kill him without treatment available only one place in the country.

But the doctor isn't in network.

So the family HMO, Health Net, has taken a series of steps that amount to a directive to let Jack die.

"You just keep thinking that you are going to wake up and it is all resolved,'' he says. "It is so clearly the right path for Jack. I keep thinking I am going to get the letter from some guy saying, 'Sorry, he fell through the cracks. We will get this done.' ''

That isn't going to happen. It didn't happen when the Zembschs' primary-care physician, Dr. Jane Hunter at Alta Bates Medical Center in Berkeley, wrote a note to Health Net saying "it is imperative'' that Jack see Mackenzie.

It didn't happen when Health Net sent Jack to the highly regarded UCSF medical center to be treated by Dr. Mohammad Diab, a surgeon who is in charge of pediatric orthopedics. Diab told the family he essentially had no experience with the surgery Jack needs and wrote to Health Net that Jack should see Mackenzie immediately.

"The door is closing, if not closed,'' Diab wrote.

It doesn't get any plainer than that. Jack needs an operation. He will die without it.

"I thought it was a no-brainer at that point,'' says Arnold Levinson, a San Francisco health care insurance attorney.

Apparently not. In all there were four appeals. Some were filed twice. In every case, Health Net took the entire 30 days allowed by law to respond, then came up with another rejection or roadblock. Finally, on Oct. 12, Health Net ruled that Jack should go back to Diab.

So everyone, including the doctor that Health Net wants treating Jack, are on the same page -- only Dr. Mackenzie has the expertise to treat Jack. But Health Net does not care. Better one child should die for the good of the shareholders. than the bottom line be impacted negatively.

But a lawsuit is coming -- Monday.

As the spouse of a chronically ill patient, I hope that Health Net gets crushed.

Posted by: Greg at 12:52 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Do you remember The Rainmaker? That story reminds me a little of that. I hope they all lose everything. I'm sick and tired of Americans screwing Americans.

Posted by: Laura at Sat Nov 5 14:20:18 2005 (ftixA)

2 Please remember this story when the insurance industry starts talking about "tort reform" again.

Posted by: Dan at Sun Nov 6 06:57:16 2005 (aSKj6)

3 There is tort reform and there is tort reform. I'm all for capping excessive awards -- but not when there is a prima facie case of willful disregard of a patient's health.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Nov 6 08:38:49 2005 (fcpX0)

4 That's not what tort reform calls for. Under most tort reform, the most "crushing" HealthNet would face would be a couple hundred thousand dollars. Everyone is against "excessive awards" but nobody can agree on what they are.

Posted by: Dan at Wed Nov 9 03:06:20 2005 (cQoOv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.0052, elapsed 0.0144 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0111 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]