September 06, 2007

Net Neutrality Takes A Hit

And if this Justice Department decision stands, we could see higher charges for speedy delivery of email, as well as different speeds for delivery of other web content.

The Justice Department on Thursday said Internet service providers should be allowed to charge a fee for priority Web traffic.

The agency told the Federal Communications Commission, which is reviewing high-speed Internet practices, that it is opposed to "Net neutrality," the principle that all Internet sites should be equally accessible to any Web user.

Several phone and cable companies, such as AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp., have previously said they want the option to charge some users more money for loading certain content or Web sites faster than others.

The Justice Department said imposing a Net neutrality regulation could hamper development of the Internet and prevent service providers from upgrading or expanding their networks. It could also shift the "entire burden of implementing costly network expansions and improvements onto consumers," the agency said in its filing.

Of course, the question becomes whether the internet is more like the telephone company or the post office. The Justice Department argues the latter, with its differential rates for speed of delivery, while I'd argue for the former, which is required to connect all calls in an equal fashion.

Will Congress intervene to overturn this decision?

Posted by: Greg at 09:36 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.

1 You might want to call the office of Kay Bailey Hutchison, who's voted against net neutrality and is on the relevant committee and thus relatively influential on this issue.

Posted by: John at Fri Sep 7 15:23:15 2007 (OTFxD)

2 You seem to assume I haven't.

Indeed, you seem to assume I haven't spoken to her in person on the issue.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 8 00:23:25 2007 (sRh/O)

3 Interesting that you suggest that the Post Office example should be used to support Net Neutrality as the Post Office does indeed provide different classes of service which is fee-based. When it absolutely has to get there overnight, you can pay to ensure prioritized delivery.


Posted by: Ed Delaney at Sat Sep 8 03:35:40 2007 (RNXRl)

4 Thanks Ed, for pointing out my mistake in the last sentence. I didn't proofread, but now fixed it. I actually support the telephone company model, not the post office one.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 8 03:42:45 2007 (sRh/O)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.0037, elapsed 0.0111 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0085 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]