June 14, 2006

Will Dems Back Withdrawal

Last fall, only three Democrats were willing to go on record in support of the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq -- even as they cheered such a proposal from Cut-'n'-Run Murtha. Now that they are running on a platform of withdrawal, will the Democrats come out and oppose a resolution calling for America to stay the course in Iraq?

Nearly four years after it authorized the use of force in Iraq, the House today will embark on its first extended debate on the war, with Republican leaders daring Democrats to vote against a nonbinding resolution to hold firm on Iraq and the war on terrorism.

In the wake of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's death and President Bush's surprise trip to Baghdad, Republican leaders are moving quickly to capitalize on good news and trying to force Democrats on the defensive. Bush continued his own campaign with a morning news conference and a White House meeting with congressional leaders from both parties, while House leaders strategized on today's 10-hour debate.

A memo from House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) urged House Republican members Tuesday to make the debate "a portrait of contrasts between Republicans and Democrats." After Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) was booed this week by liberal activists for her failure to resolutely oppose the war, Republicans hope to present a united front that highlights the fractures in the Democratic Party.

"As a result of our efforts during this debate, Americans will recognize that on the issue of national security, they have a clear choice between a Republican Party aware of the stakes and dedicated to victory, versus a Democratic Party without a coherent national security policy that sheepishly dismisses the challenges America faces in a post-9/11 world," Boehner wrote.

This is a daring strategy -- there are some Republicans who are critical of Administration policy in Iraq. But as a whole, the GOP is uspportive of President Bush and the troops in the field, while the rhetoric of the Democrats has not been. Are they willing to put their money where their moutg is -- especially at a time when they claim their views represent the true feelings of the American people? I bet not -- especially because my conversations with folks indicate that even though frustration witht he Iraq war is common, few people really disagree with the policy.

Posted by: Greg at 11:02 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 399 words, total size 3 kb.

1 With those in our enlightened media such as Twisted Tim McGirk relaying unbiased tales of tragedy in Iraq through such fine, upstanding publications as Time Magazine, the American people are sure to have some opposition to the war in Iraq. It is to be expected in country such as Iraq, where deceit was de rigeur for the Saddam government, that these type of hoaxes would be perpetrated. If you consider two of the main architects of this travesty, al-Mashhadani and Hadithi, worked to spread deception for Saddam in years past, it all begins to make sense.

Dr. Wahid's right in there with them, as a former participant in Saddam's "children's hospital scam", used to extort money from those in the world fooled by his and Saddam's shenanigans. Hadditha is a Bathist stronghold of 90,000. By many accounts of those in-country, it's as bad as anywhere in Iraq.

One other thing. Brass does not end up in neat, little piles after being extracted from a rifle. This is especially true if nothing at the scene has been touched before the imiges were taken, as was stated.

It smells like a rat. Dead. In the 125 degree heat of the Iraqi desert.

Posted by: Debt Free at Thu Jun 15 01:50:51 2006 (10HyZ)

2 The House rejected a bill to provide for a timetable for withdrawl after hours of heated debate. From where I sit, the Democoms are hoplessly divided and seem to be furiously grasping at straws while the Republocrats steal money at a furious rate and spend, spend, spend while passing tax breaks for the wealthy who are doubtless quietly getting themselves and their families and money out of the country. Congress is virtually impotent to do much of anything except pass pork barrel bills.

Posted by: glide at Fri Jun 16 03:45:45 2006 (o6AYB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0048, elapsed 0.0118 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0086 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]