July 18, 2006
In WW II, the total German dead were 10.82% of the population, and the much lower Japanese rate was 3.61%. But the UK lost 0.94% and the USA 0.32%. Were the Allied defenders of freedom “dis-proportionate”?What moral or military or historical logic suggests to Chirac and Putin that Israel is “disproportionate”? Since when is the aggressor entitled to suffer only the same losses as the defender ? Did De Gaulle or Stalin make that complaint in, or after, WW II ?
A Just War is not for revenge or reprisal, but to eliminate a deadly threat. The Fanatical Jihadi Fringe is such a threat, and for other Arabs and Muslims as well. The “proportionate” casualties they take are whatever it takes to conquer them thoroughly, and remove their aggressive capacity for good.
Our hopes and prayers are with the “Armed Democrats” of the IDF, on land, sea and air, on whose courage, determination, and skills not only the people of Israel depend, but all those who are, or who seek to be, truly free, including the majority in Lebanon.
Yours etc,
Tom Carew
Israel has a right to exist, safe from attack by barbarians beyond its borders. God and the international community (the UN) have both confirmed Israel's title to the land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean.
Posted by: Greg at
02:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 2 kb.
Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox theologians
on the subject,nullified the Abrahamic Covenant when the Jews in disobedience rejected Christ.
Contrasting views only came to the fore in theologically "Left evangelical" British
sects in the 19th Century.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Jul 19 10:55:56 2006 (DZbll)
Century and then chiefly among British and American theologically Left evangelicals.
Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Jul 19 10:58:53 2006 (DZbll)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Jul 19 11:19:34 2006 (czVoS)
21 queries taking 0.0121 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.