March 08, 2006

"I'm Not Doing It For Casey"

Well, the Ditch Bitch finally admits it .

It seems that the protests of "Saint Cindy Sheehan, Our Lady of the Martyred Soldier" has made it clear that her protests have nothing to do with her son, Case, who was killed in Iraq.

MODERATOR: Cindy, here's a question for you... "Over the past several months you've become a lightning rod for the anti-war movement, and a polarizing figure for military families. Is this what Casey would have wanted? Or are you doing this for yourself?"...

...CINDY SHEEHAN: I'm doing this for... the troops to come home.

(applause)

CINDY SHEEHAN: And... I'm not doing this for Casey. Casey's already dead. I wish I would have done it for Casey before he was killed.(emphasis added)

Let's not forget -- Casey reenlisted knowing that he would be sent to Iraq -- and supported the mission there. He was a hero before he died, is a hero after death, and the exploitation of his good name by those who oppose his choice and the sacrifice he made is hideous.

And that Mama Sheehan stands upon the dead body of her son to use him as a pulpit to preach against what he believed is truly vile.

By the way, Cindy -- when will you buy Casey's headstone? His grave is still unmarked. But you can afford a new convertible. It is really clear that you aren't doing this for Casey -- you are doing this for you.

Your 15 minutes are up, woman -- and your allegedly unquestionable moral authority has evaporated.

Posted by: Greg at 06:13 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.

1 She's doing it for the troops who are still alive. Your attempt to rip her words out of context is intellectually dishonest and almost as disgraceful as your name-calling.

Posted by: Dan at Wed Mar 8 12:14:14 2006 (aSKj6)

2 Why don't you worry about the sickos on your side who are crashing military funerals and thanking God for the deaths of American soldiers.
This is the religious right, my friend, and I'll take even Cindy Sheehan's shameless self-promotion over despicable, bigoted, anti-American crap any frickin' day of the week.

But I guess that isn't the kinda thing you want to bring to anybody's attention on this sort of site.

Posted by: Nomar at Wed Mar 8 16:36:22 2006 (pCWGX)

3 Fred Phelps is a Democrat, and no Christian. He has been condemned by conservative Christians for at least 20 years -- but since his little cult is composed mostly of his own family, it is sort of difficult to take him seriously.

By the way, I've written about the asshole in the past, condemning this cclergyman who supported Al Gore in no uncertain terms.

And Dan -- she is doing it for her own bloated ego.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Mar 8 17:39:37 2006 (EqS+g)

4 RWR - She ought to get a blog instead, huh?

Nomar - believe it or not, Phelps called himself a democrat in the past - and I think he is one instance where the right and left can unite in condemning the asshole.

Posted by: Dan at Thu Mar 9 01:36:37 2006 (aSKj6)

5 Dan-- use logic, I know it is hard for a devote liberal, but try.

Cindy isn't doing this for anyone but herself, FLAT OUT.

She doesn't care about you and she definitely doesn't care about the troops..

She does care about keeping herself in the spot light, and people like you try to keep her there.

She is a true whacko, but then she is a liberal, they seem to go together..

Nomar, if you want to see what a selfish bigot looks like, look no further than your mirror.

As a Christian I have never done any of what you say. I have finally put my foot down and have had enough of the liberal progressive take over of the US and taken the US to the sewer head first and fast.

If that makes you made, that is on you.

As a Christian I am always open for lively debate, but can honestly say I have never gotten that debate from a liberal..

I have from democrats and republicans, but never a liberal or neo-con.

Posted by: Scubachris at Thu Mar 9 04:15:03 2006 (AktpP)

6 Scuba, you ask me to use logic, and then jump into name calling and guesswork about what motivates Ms. Sheehan. How is that responsive to my supported charge that RWR ripped her words from context?

Posted by: Dan at Thu Mar 9 17:10:06 2006 (aSKj6)

7 Dan, Cindy admits she didn't and isn't doing this for Casey, which just leaves herself.

Her family and ex-husband have distanced them selves from here and her hate spewing..

Casey "FREELY" reenlisted in the military and approved of the war on terror..

Three facts, to your one opinion.

My opinion is, Casey would not agree with what his mother is doing, and that is why she didn't do it while he was alive.

Why do I believe that? Because he reenlisted and BELIEVED in what he was doing. That speaks volumes! It meant he agreed we needed to be there and he knew he would go back by reenlisting.

Amazing none of that is mentioned by you liberals, but you sure jump on Cindy's boat that she is doing this for Casey, because Casey wanted her too.

No, looking past the weak smoke and mirrors Cindy and the liberals are using you can clearly see Cindy is using her dead son for her benefit and the liberals are trying to use Cindy for their benefit, and both are pissed because the average American see's through the weak smoke and mirrors they are using.

Posted by: Scubachris at Fri Mar 10 03:37:25 2006 (AktpP)

8 If you go to the first link in the post, you will see I'm not taking it out of context. -- and it is being reported by the guy responsible for the question.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Mar 10 05:58:55 2006 (WM5Et)

9 "CINDY SHEEHAN: I'm doing this for... the troops to come home."

Game, set, match.

You may or may not believe her, but RWR's headline is ripped out of context.

Posted by: Dan at Fri Mar 10 07:03:14 2006 (aSKj6)

10 Actually, that confirms my point -- her allegedly unquestionable moral authority has been based upon her son's death, but she now admits this is not about him at all (as witnessed by his unmarked grave). In light of the lack of honor shown to her own son and her own words which you quote (and which I linked to for all to see), this deranged woman clearly has no more moral authority than any other anti-military maggot.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Mar 10 08:41:46 2006 (a+Pzb)

11 Who says she has unquestionable moral authority? Is it getting crowded with all those straw men around you?

Why do you feel the need to resort to so much name-calling? Looks like a sign of weakness, to me.

Posted by: Dan at Fri Mar 10 09:05:55 2006 (DMAnO)

12 I made a slight error on my quote -- but one which does nothing to change the meaning of the statement. The term used was absolute moral authority, and the writer was Maureen Dowd. The assertion was later picked up by numerous leftists to argue that whe should do whatever Cindy Sheehan demands regarding the war -- despite the fact that many more parents of our war dead continue to support the war in Iraq.

And while I didn't give links before , you can see where I have talked about Phelps in the past.

http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/110099.php
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/091455.php
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/109739.php
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/114290.php

Heck -- I even reference him peripherally here

http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/110566.php

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Mar 11 05:16:14 2006 (yO9kr)

13 Hey, we've got no disagreement about Phelps. And you're insane if you think that Maureen Dowd's quotation means anything more than if I quote some deranged nonsense from Limbaugh or Coulter.

Posted by: Dan at Sat Mar 11 15:05:34 2006 (aSKj6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
14kb generated in CPU 0.0082, elapsed 0.2325 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.2252 seconds, 42 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]