After all, if we are going to question the veracity of contemporary historical events, maybe we should look into events much further in the past.

I just got an e-mail from Bhuvan who tried to post a comment at the BBC. The comment, on a story about the Holocaust denial conference in Iran was apparently too controversial.

Now wait, I would like to see a conference that questions whether Prophet Muhammad existed or not. Sounds controversial? Why not? Free speech. There is more historical proof to the occurrence of the Holocaust than for the existence of Prophet Muhammad.

Indeed. So, in the spirit of 'free speech', we at The Jawa Report are organizing the first ever Was Mohammed Real? conference. Panels include:

Mohammed: Was he real or just another Zionist plot?

The Crusades: Ultra-Orthodox Muslims speak out against using the Crusades as justification for a Palestinian state.

Did Mohammed Conquer Mecca? New evidence suggests otherwise.

72 White Grapes vs. 72 Virgins: The etymology of patriarchy in Islamic societies.

'Angelic visit' or 'Pedophelic Visions': The fiction of Mohammed and his 9 year old lover Aisha.

The Illuminati: Why the Great Seal of The United States offers definitive proof that Mohammed was really a 32nd degree Mason.

You get the picture. Any other suggestions?

And might I add another topic for the conference:

Mental Illness or Demonic Possession: An Analysis of MohammadÂ’s QuÂ’ranic Visions

Other topics of discussion can be found at IMAO.

After all, if all we are doing is engaging in free speech asking questions and exploring issues that will get you imprisoned (or worse) in some parts of the worldÂ…

Posted by: Greg at 11:14 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.