November 09, 2007
New York Times columnist David Brooks sorts out the history of the speech and how it came to be given.
Reagan’s speech at the fair was short and cheerful, and can be heard at: www.onlinemadison.com/ftp/reagan/reaganneshoba.mp3. He told several jokes, and remarked: “I know speaking to this crowd, I’m speaking to a crowd that’s 90 percent Democrat.”He spoke mostly about inflation and the economy, but in the middle of a section on schools, he said this: “Programs like education and others should be turned back to the states and local communities with the tax sources to fund them. I believe in states’ rights. I believe in people doing as much as they can at the community level and the private level.”
The use of the phrase “states’ rights” didn’t spark any reaction in the crowd, but it led the coverage in The Times and The Post the next day.
Reagan flew to New York and delivered his address to the Urban League, in which he unveiled an urban agenda, including enterprise zones and an increase in the minimum wage. He was received warmly, but not effusively. Much of the commentary that week was about whether ReaganÂ’s outreach to black voters would work.
You can look back on this history in many ways. It’s callous, at least, to use the phrase “states’ rights” in any context in Philadelphia. Reagan could have done something wonderful if he’d mentioned civil rights at the fair. He didn’t. And it’s obviously true that race played a role in the G.O.P.’s ascent.
Still, the agitprop version of this week — that Reagan opened his campaign with an appeal to racism — is a distortion, as honest investigators ranging from Bruce Bartlett, who worked for the Reagan administration and is the author of “Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy,” to Kevin Drum, who writes for Washington Monthly, have concluded.
But still the slur spreads. ItÂ’s spread by people who, before making one of the most heinous charges imaginable, couldnÂ’t even take 10 minutes to look at the evidence. It posits that there was a master conspiracy to play on the alleged Klan-like prejudices of American voters, when there is no evidence of that conspiracy. And, of course, in a partisan age there are always people eager to believe this stuff.
Of course there is such an audience, given that the version attacking Reagan fits the false narrative built up by Democrat partisans about the GOP being a party of uneducated racists -- a narrative which is racist in its disregard for southern whites. ANd indeed, it overlooks the fact that, as Reagan points out in the speech, much of his audience was composed of Democrats -- folks who may have voted for Reagan that fall, but who also cast ballots for Democrats for every other office in that same election.
Posted by: Greg at
12:43 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 572 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Davebo at Mon Nov 12 03:45:19 2007 (+B4yM)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Nov 12 13:30:29 2007 (K/m+D)
21 queries taking 0.0311 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.