1 yeah he sure is a witch hunter, given the 12 of his 15 political prosecutions have been democrats. you are an ass. Fucking moron.

2 I see you got the MoveOn.org talking points.

The problem was that the Democrats are all in the far past, and were all folks who were running against candidates he supported. He used his office to bring charges against his political enemies at a time when they were still in the Democrat Party.

If you were someone who lived in Texas, or who had done a little research, you would know that.

3 If Texas were the last inhabitable place on this earth I'd rather fucking die than live in that laboratory for shitty government.

4 If the 12 out 15 who were indicted as Democrats, then that means Democrats break Texas laws at frequency 4 times greater than Republicans? If you take DeLay out (by which he didn't do anything in the first place) and Hutchinson, then it'd be a frequency of 5 times greater where well known Texan Democrats would have the tendency to break Texas laws in politics.




Nameless coward are you?

5 Actually, the laboratories for shitty government are found in New Jersey and Louisiana.

6 Delay is a attack dog and it shows by his reaction that whole bunch rove delay and the white house attack whenever something pops out that catches them in wrong doing Outing a CIA agent is treason but will anything be done about it ?

7 This is insanity, M. Rhymes-- if conservative shit-gimps like yourself are honestly sure that Delay hasn't done anything wrong, why not just allow him to go to court and clear his name?

8 Ok Rhymes lets accuse you of say Pedophilia and if your innocent it will be proved in court... maybe

9 Excuse me I ment Pierce

10 I love it when the Leftists show up spewing profanity and poorly punctuated talking points. But I think I will answer their points.

1) What do you expect him to do when he is indicted on a charge that did not even exist at the time he supposedly did the act -- sit quietly by and allow the prosecution to continue? Did you expect him to remain quiet when the prosecutor engaged in unethical -- and likely illegal -- activity with regards to securing the indictment? In such a case it is appropriate to go on the offensive.

2) Last time I checked, treason is clearly defined in Article III of the US Constitution, as is the standard for proving it. Insofar as i can tell, no one in the plame case has made war on the United States, adhered to the enemies of the United States (well, maybe Wilson did) or given them aid and comfort. I do not believe there are two witnesses to the same overt act. Therefore there could never be a conviction that would pass Constitutional muster.

3) Why not let DeLay go on trial? Simple -- because I don't believe that someone should have to defend themselves from a legally insufficient indictment. Such indictments are the stock-in-trade of the American Left -- witness the Ray Donovan trial during the Reagan Administration for an earlier example.

11 Funny how the left doesn't question why it took 3 years and 6 grand juries to finally come up with an indictment on a conspiracy charge? And yet that couldn't stick for obvious legal reasons. And a 7th grand jury was contrived for the sake of tacking a "money laundering" charge on top of the conspiracy charge in just a day.

Seems to me the evidence weighs more against Ronnie Earle at political hacking and prosecutorial misconduct than there is evidence of DeLay of money laundering. Earle's actions alone seemed to have did him in where he has tried for so long to come up with a charge just enough to get DeLay to step down as the House majority leader. Knowing full well that even if DeLay does clear his name, he would unable to return to his seat in time.

Now, looking in the past, not only did he indict Kay Bailey Hutchison within days after she won her Senate seat (the first such seat occupied by a Republican since 1875), but he also "investigated" or indicted Democrats who managed to get on his wrong side, like Gib Lewis, who once ran against Earle for office, and Bob Bullock, the Democrat political mentor of President Bush.

At a recent Democrat fundraiser, Earle compared Tom DeLay to a bully. Such a thing is not only in bad taste, but is probably also illegal, since the ABA's Canon of Ethics prohibits extra-judicial statements concerning "the character...of the accused" or "any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused, the evidence, or the merits of the case." Apparently, Earle is using his power to prosecute DeLay in the media before he tries to prosecute him in court. The potential for contaminating the jury pool is mind-boggling. It would be nice to bring down Ronnie Earle on ethics charges. Such a thing could happen -- Tom DeLay is a tough fighter and Ronnie Earle just may have met his match.
(from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1493863/posts)

For Earle's antics alone on how he abused the court system and should be disbarred.

Send in your complaints regarding Earle to the Texas Bar Association demanding he be disbarred.

The required grievance form, download the document here:

http://www.law.uh.edu/libraries/ethics/attydiscipline/howfile.html


Address to send it:

http://www.texasbar.com/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=3961&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

It ain't over folks. Just as when bloggers do find the truth as they did on Rather's fakey Bush Memo case, they'll get to the bottom of it and show the true light of Earle's poltical hacking career.