April 04, 2006

Feingold's Plan -- Run Left Of America

First he called for censure -- now he is backing homosexual marriage.

Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), a prospective 2008 presidential candidate, said yesterday that he thinks bans on same-sex marriages have no place in the nation's laws.

Feingold said in an interview that he was motivated to state his position on one of the most divisive social issues in the country after being asked at a town hall meeting Sunday about a pending amendment to the Wisconsin state constitution to ban same-sex marriages.

Feingold called the amendment "a mean-spirited attempt" to single out gay men and lesbians for discrimination and said he would vote against it. But he went further, announcing that he favors legalizing same-sex marriages.

That puts him at odds with many prominent Democratic politicians who support gay rights but not same-sex marriage. Should Feingold decide to run for the party's presidential nomination in 2008, his position would put him to the left of many likely rivals.

"Obviously, it's a very difficult issue and evokes a lot of emotions," Feingold said in a telephone interview yesterday. "I think it's something ultimately that people throughout the country will accept, but it's not an easy issue." He accused the Bush White House and the Republican Party of using same-sex marriage as a wedge issue "to hurt Democrats who are against discrimination."

Gee, Russ, every time the people have been permitted to speak on the issue, they have opposed homosexual marriage. The level of opposition has been somewhere on the order of 2-to-1 or 3-to-1 Your position may get you the votes of the out-of-touch Left in the Democrat party, effectively getting you the nomination. But your position will not play well in Peoria -- or most of the rest of the country.

Posted by: Greg at 10:40 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I noticed the ad for eye surgery; was that just for Sen. Feingold, not having the ability to see the error of his ways?

Posted by: T F Stern at Wed Apr 5 00:58:32 2006 (dz3wA)

2 It's called leadership. Your preference for politicians who follow the polls is understandable and widely imitated, but not very inspiring.

Tactically, I'm not certain how bad it is. Clearly, the strongly anti-gay rights people were not likely to wind up in his camp anyhow. Nor did he really gain many votes from the left. Where he may have gained some votes (or not - time will tell) is from the many in the middle who have no strong opinions on the issue, but who may respond to someone on the side of freedom who actually has the courage to take a stand. I think a good number of democrats are afraid of their own convictions - I particularly don't like those who support civil unions but not gay marriage. To me, that's hair-splitting - you're either for equality or not.

Posted by: Dan at Wed Apr 5 07:40:27 2006 (y9xzG)

3 Nope -- just a little (now eliminated) trackback spam.

But i like your interpretation.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Apr 5 09:52:34 2006 (ld4u6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.0128, elapsed 0.0208 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0169 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]