November 22, 2007
But young sluts on college campus are instead angry that their promiscuity is no longer being subsidized.
In health centers at hundreds of colleges and universities around the country, young women are paying sharply higher prices for prescription contraceptives because of a change in federal law.The increases have meant that some students using popular birth control pills and other products are paying three and four times as much as they did several months ago. The higher prices have also affected about 400 community health centers nationwide used by poor women.
The change is due to a provision in a federal law that ended a practice by which drug manufacturers provided prescription contraception to the health centers at deeply discounted rates. The centers then passed along the savings to students and others.
Some Democratic lawmakers in Washington are pressing for new legislation by yearÂ’s end that would reverse the provision, which they say was inadvertently included in a law intended to reduce Medicaid abuse. In the meantime, health care and reproductive rights advocates are warning that some young women are no longer receiving the contraception they did in the past.
Want an example of the ditzy young floozies who are impacted by this change? Here's one.
“The potential is that women will stop taking it, and whether or not you can pay for it, that doesn’t mean that you’ll stop having sex,” said Katie Ryan, a senior at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, who said that the monthly cost of her Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo, a popular birth control pill, recently jumped to nearly $50 from $12.Ms. Ryan, 22, said she had considered switching to another contraceptive to save money, but was unsure which one to pick. She has ended up paying the higher price, but said she was concerned about her budget.
“I do less because of this — less shopping, less going out to eat,” said Ms. Ryan, who has helped organize efforts to educate others on campus about the price jump. “For students, this is very, very expensive.”
Let's see -- you'll go through 13 of these prescriptions a year. Multiply that by the $38 dollar price increase and we are talking less than $500 dollars a year -- about $1.35 a day, by my count. I suppose you could have one fewer bottle of soda a day, or perhaps not drop by Starbucks every day. Maybe you could do what people on a limited income have done for years -- eat out less, economize at the grocery store, and not buy as many luxuries. Heck, Katie -- maybe you could quit doing the horizontal mambo with your boyfriend, or start asking him to chip-in to cover the cost. After all, giving it away for free is not really morally superior to selling it -- and if you think that a buck-and-a-quarter makes you cheap, what does free make you (besides easy)?
Now some folks are waxing eloquent about forcing women to make a decision -- “For them this is like a choice — groceries or birth control.” But the last time I checked, one is a necessity and the other isn't. In the great scheme of things, the choice between food and f*cking is not a contest.
And then there is this absurd comment from New York Congressman Joseph Crowley.
“We’re talking about adults, responsible adults who want to do the responsible thing.”
Congressman, I hate to tell you, but you are wrong. Responsibility consists in taking responsibility for your decisions an being prepared to make hard choices. it does not consist in insisting that you want it all and demanding that someone else subsidize your sex life for you.
Here's a really crazy idea for these girls to consider -- if you can't afford the costs associated with having sex, maybe you need to not have sex.
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Nuke's, Three Forces Of Evil, Right Truth, Shadowscope, Pirate's Cove, Global American Discourse, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog's Weblog, Dumb Ox Daily News, Conservative Cat, and High Desert Wanderer, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Posted by: Greg at
05:01 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 720 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Dan at Thu Nov 22 05:47:12 2007 (IU21y)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 22 06:02:06 2007 (1bm0v)
Posted by: Dan at Thu Nov 22 06:58:26 2007 (IU21y)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 22 07:31:16 2007 (1bm0v)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 22 07:34:30 2007 (1bm0v)
Posted by: Dan at Thu Nov 22 07:55:05 2007 (IU21y)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Nov 22 08:04:59 2007 (1bm0v)
Posted by: John757 at Fri May 22 07:23:27 2009 (hw/lS)
21 queries taking 0.0092 seconds, 37 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.