December 12, 2006

I Don't Know What To Say About This One

I'm pretty liberal when it comes to acceptable activities for teachers outside of working hours. Blogging has made me acutely aware of the problems that could arise if schools could simply fire teachers for their exercise of freedom of expression in their private lives.

But I have really mixed emotions about this.

Stephen Murmer's secret career as an artist has caught up with him.

Murmer, a popular high school art teacher, was suspended after objections were raised about his private abstract artwork, much of which includes smearing his posterior and genitals with paint and pressing them against canvas.

Murmer contacted the American Civil Liberties Union on Friday, saying school administrators had suspended him with pay for five days because of his work as a painter and that he could face further punishment, ACLU legal director Rebecca Glenberg said.

Murmer has been instructed by Monacan High School administrators not to speak with the media, Glenberg said. He did not return messages seeking comment Tuesday.

Schools spokeswoman Debra Marlow confirmed that a Monacan art teacher had been placed on administrative leave but declined to provide additional details because it is a personnel issue.

"In the school system, personnel regulations state that teachers are expected to set an example for students through their personal conduct," Marlow said. "Additionally, the Supreme Court has stated that schools must teach by example and that teachers, like parents, are role models."

Murmer went to great lengths to keep his work life separate from his activities as an artist, said ACLU executive director Kent Willis. As an artist, he goes by the name "Stan Murmur," and appears in disguise in photographs and videos promoting his art.

"As a public employee, he has constitutional rights, and he certainly has the right to engage in private legal activities protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution," Willis said.

Like I said, I really don't know what to think about this one -- is there a line beyond which we teachers cannot go if we wish to stay in the field of education? What do you think?

More on this story in the Washington Post

Posted by: Greg at 11:23 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 372 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Numero uno, I personally think that that sounds more like idiotic juvenile showboating, not art. I don't need to see art made by anyone's wee-wee.

But--
Numero dos, he does have the right to do his artwork, and he did not set out to link his school life to his artistic life. And we do not abandon all rights when we become teachers, even if his artwork sounds nonsensical.

Now, he did forget that he was teaching in Virginia, not New York.

Posted by: Ms. Cornelius at Wed Dec 13 12:03:46 2006 (28H9e)

2 Frankly, I agree with your assessment -- but it also shows how far our concepts of "art" and "culture" have degraded.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Dec 13 13:05:53 2006 (TXzYv)

3 UZxXMNN640z ultracet ultracet vs. ultram

Posted by: ultracetH90H at Mon Mar 2 12:46:06 2009 (26QBK)

4 zABGBOdBNcKC8N9 fioricet fioricet 325

Posted by: fioricetYFxCMN at Mon Mar 2 19:21:35 2009 (WkzBk)

Posted by: fioricetJvAX at Mon Mar 2 22:55:13 2009 (NAerT)

6 K8n4AZybS497Ys doxycycline doxycycline bacterial infection

Posted by: doxycyclineykW09oAnjo7D at Mon Mar 2 23:27:06 2009 (hxHE2)

Posted by: ativanpNfDmiRU at Fri Mar 6 14:04:26 2009 (swT53)

Posted by: soma8qltW9Mrddfg at Fri Nov 13 05:06:17 2009 (sMueF)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0037, elapsed 0.0129 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0103 seconds, 37 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]