1 Yeah, William Pryor is really diverse person -- like I really believe you. The Bush Administration is full of "yes men".



R-

2 Perfect example of a guy who doesn't believe in diversity even if people are qualified for the positions. A good example of what an ass looks like...the Democrat donkey I mean.

3 Still bitter that friends of mine sicced on you on your blogsite to a point where you had to delete and block them all?

Childish, McWeenie. You can dish it out but can't take it ... pitiful.

R-

4 Miguel Estrada.

Janice Rogers Brown.

Henry Saad.

Condoleeza Rice.

Alberto Gonzalez.

I could continue.

5 It's interesting to note that the GOP is so fixated on race that they can't possibly comprehend that a Democrat might oppose a minority members's nomination, not because the individual is a minority but because they don't feel the individual is qualified. You have to remember that we think differently than you. Race just isn't a factor.

6 Please do...RWR. Have you heard of Wayne Perryman? He has a great book called "Unfounded Loyalty". Great reading, too.

Last night I blogged about Wayne Perryman who is a black minister in conjunction with Howard "Racist" Dean recent, greatest and latest comments -

===============
The Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people...."

"They're a pretty monolithic party......"

"They all behave the same and they all look the same....."

"It's pretty much a white, Christian party....(which was yesterday).
==============
http://kokonutpundits.blogspot.com/2005/06/when-howard-racist-dean-says-they-all.html


Like I said, a Donkey is an ass. Why aren't we surprised?

7 Dolphin, and I suppose you agree with Dean's comments, then?

Republicans think differently - they support and encourage people from different race backgrounds even when they're already qualified. I believe Wayne Perryman noticed that alot.

8 "R"...rather, it is they who cannot dish it out when they refuse to follow my rules in my blogsite. Debate, fine. Namecalling on owner and commenters? No.

Any idiot can call names. Just ask a five year old kid. But not everybody can debate effectively. That's what make debate that much more interesting. So, what do they do when these people cannot debate effectively? Well, they call names instead.

Does your friends/minions/"independent thinkers" include RWR who you say are both buddy buddy pal pal for a long time like you said earlier to me yesterday where you pretty much gave a cue to your minions "sic" on me in your blogsite?? Who are your real friends, really?

Nice show of intellectual dishonesty there.

That's all I'm going to say. My apologies to RWR in all of this travesty.

I can see where Dean is coming from.

9 Were I President, I would not aim for diversity...if I got it, I would and if I didn't, it's no big deal. That's because being diverse isn't my goal. My goal is to take America down the best road, and my path to it would be to take the best and the brightest that share my goals. I don't care if they're all of one race, background, creed, or religion, so long as they help get the country where I want it to go.

Furthermore - it was Clinton who stated that he would have a cabinet that mirrored America's racial makeup...don't tell me he didn't care about race. He insisted on certain races for his cabinet.

Ultimately, I don't care if someone's from Morocco, Fiji, or Sweden. I care about ability.

What I am really sick of though, is how so many in the left imply that conservative minorities are somehow not 'real' minorities. People don't have to be liberal to be black or the like...liberalism is quite irrelevant to that fact of existance.

R: So you've got a judge that is white. SO? Guess what...whites represent a large section of America. We're also allowed to be given judgeships!

Sub

10 mcconnel, actually I agree with what i saw on another blog somewhere (can't remember off the top of my head where or I'd link): Dean's comments were idiotic, it's clearly STRAIGHT white Christians.

The RNC keeps a few minorities on hand so that they can throw the race card up anytime anyone questions their agenda. RWR does it all the time, it goes something like this: "Rice supported the war on Iraq today, liberals didn't like her opinion because she's black, those rascists!"

I wish I had the stats on diversity at my figer tips. Were it a contest, the DNC would blow the RNC out of the water, but as I said, it just doesn't really make all that big of a difference to me. I don't see the point in bragging over the number of minorities you employ.

11 Oh and Sub,

I don't think R was refering to William Pryor because of his race, I think he was calling him out for being "the most demonstrably antigay judicial nominee in recent memory,"

12 Speaking of judges, 6 - 3 decision by Federal judges on the medical marijuana. Guess who the 3 dissented? Conservative judges. Looks like the 6 Liberals were the back-stabbers.

13 I think that Democrats don't like Rice for racist reasons that are a bit different than you may initially think.

I think they're (some of 'em anyway) being racist because they say she's not really black or acts too 'white' to be genuinely black. That is racist against whites AND blacks. It implies that whites think alike, that blacks think alike, and that anyone who thinks differently than what the speaker expects is trying to be what they are not...or more specifically that it's bad to be one of them (in this case, usually white).

I don't have a titanic problem with people who hate white people...at least not much more than I do with any stupid person...one of the generalities I use is that bigots tend to be stupid (it's something that's statistically sound), and I therefore tend to avoid them (I don't like being near stupid people).

That said; it bugs me to no end when these people achieve political office. That tells me that either many people fail to see bigotry where I do (which could mean I am wrong or they have diffculty seeing it), or that they don't care (a bit of a greater concern, since I like to think most people aren't bigots.

Sub

14 Speaking of judges, 6 - 3 decision by Federal judges on the medical marijuana. Guess who the 3 dissented? Conservative judges. Looks like the 6 Liberals were the back-stabbers.

Scalia's a Liberal judge?

Anyways, I'll say what I said when RWR he mentioned the percieved politics of the justices on my site. I applaud good decisions and condemn bad decisions. Whether or not I agree with a decision has NOTHING to do with whether it is made by the "conservative" justices or the "liberal" justices (all but two of whom were appointed by Republicans).

15 I'm pointing to minorities because How-weird Dean says we are a bunch of white Christians. To refute that point, I needed to bring up prominent and powerful minorities.

As for Democrats opposing minorities on matters of principle, I know that happens. Look at the opposition of "Sheets" Byrd (KKK -- Dogpatch) to Thurgood Marshal -- Byrd opposed him based on Marshal's position that segregation was a violation of the Constitution and that blacks were permitted to vote under the 13th Amendment. So I know it happens. And in the case of Janixe Rogers Brown, one of the extremist opinions she is criticized for by Democrats and other liberals is one that argues that race-based police stops violate the equal protection clause, so i know that it isn't her race they object to.

16 Wow if that wasn't a loaded response. I find it amusing that a party that is known for racism finds one member of other party with an unacceptable past and harps on it. You mentioned Sen Byrd in at least every other post.

17 As I recall, the party with the long racist history is the DEMOCRAT PARTY. The GOP is the party noted for its support of racial equality.

18 Yeah, you keep telling yourself that.

19 Actually Dolphin, he's right.

Go back and see who voted for the Civil Rights act.

Republicans. In fact, something like 90% of Democrats voted against it.

In fact, the Republican party was founded as the anti-slavery party. Check it out - there's ample evidence of it.

Sub

20 I'd like to see some of the evidence that conservatives were anti-slavery. If you're tlaking about switches in ideals between the party I'll give you that, but if you're actually talking about ideology, I'd like to see the evidence that racist ideology is also anti-slavery.

21 Howard Dean's an asshole. He's an ass for making that stupid naïve statement, AND for missing an opportunity to be accurate and expose the completely UN-Christian opportunist RNC, choosing polemics instead, helping divide and conquer.

Republicans are NOT necessarily a monolithic Christian party. Those who run it are decidedly NOT Christian, in ANY real sense of the word, besides lip service. The Democratic leadership is not Liberal in ANY real sense of the word, either. Both are twisted caricatures of conservatism, liberalism, and of Christianity.

Some Christians, the dominate-everyone-else kind of Calvinists (Calvinists burned unbelievers at the stake), *DO* run to the RNC. Other Christians who emulate Jesus' life and manner -- the kind of Christ-like Christian the RNC HATES -- liberal-minded, turn-the-other-cheek, help-the-poor Christians -- DO NOT like Republicans, BUT they have nowhere to go for decency. (yes there are 3rd parties) (and no it's a bad idea to have a political party in the US be a theological party, see Barry Goldwater below)

Furthermore, as decent and just Christian Alex Jones points out, he went from being a mere Clinton hater to seeing the big picture of the New World Order. Later, he joined some Brit news people and snuck into Bohemian Grove. See his movies. I didn't believe it. Neither did he until he saw it. Hear his interview on Coast to Coast AM.

He REALLY did take FILM of Republican (AND Democrat) power mongers, including supposed "Christians" like the Bush's, engaged in worship of an evil Deity - Moloch - in a California redwood grove. The audience participated in a Western version of ancient Babylonian ritual called the "Cremation of Care" where an infant (effigy) named "Care" or "conscience" is sacrificed on the flaming altar of a 40 foot stone owl, every summer in July.

The film is undoctored but had to be enhanced (sound and camera angle) because it was taken with a hip-mounted hidden cam. The original raw footage and some enhanced footage is in the film Dark Secrets of Bohemian Grove on www.infowars.com, but his video Martial Law covers it as well. Bohemian Grove can be downloaded from www.archive.org in low res quality.

DEMOCRATS go to the Grove too. It has ties to Occultism, the Nazi kind. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis had ties to German cults of Illuminati which gave them their basis. This is the American version, but World Leaders European Royalty and former Nazis go here.

So Howard Dean is a polemic-creating liar, who un-necessarily divided GOOD Christians with GOOD Conservative ideals and GOOD Liberals with GOOD Liberal ideals.

THAT SAID, even ARCH-CONSERVATIVE Barry Goldwater -- who created what later became the Reagan Revolution --- knew it is a gross mistake to hijack the RNC and turn it into a party representing Christianity, no matter what the justification, because a theocracy is an anethema to real Conservative politics. Look up quotes on Christianity from Barry Goldwater.

22 I'd like to hear R's comment about this whole thing. It's okay to admit that Dems were all that. To deny the truth, one cannot move on & learn from it.