May 03, 2007
I'll Agree With NY Times on This Immigration Issue
Shutting out families of legal immigrants (as opposed to guest workers) is not an acceptable option.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
America needs immigrants. Last yearÂ’s bipartisan Senate bill recognized this, and raised quotas for both family and employment-based immigration. Congress should do so again. Closing the door to families would be unjust and unworkable, and a mockery of the values that conservatives profess. It would only encourage illegality by forcing people to choose between their loved ones and the law.Compromise is necessary with any bill, particularly on an issue as complex as immigration. But if a deal hews so closely to the new harsh line of the White House and G.O.P that it fundamentally distorts AmericaÂ’s pro-immigrant tradition, it would be better to ditch the whole thing and start over.
That said, any bill guest worker program needs to make it clear that families are not eligible for immigration and that guest workers are not eligible for citizenship. And any program that includes amnesty for illegals -- no matter how it is cast or named -- is unacceptable.
Posted by: Greg at
10:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or
Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote
assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY
white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if
hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black
countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking
about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black
man wouldn't object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or
Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote
assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY
white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if
hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black
countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking
about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black
man wouldn't object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Posted by: Joe at Thu May 3 22:56:28 2007 (LcYp+)
6kb generated in CPU 0.0282, elapsed 0.0617 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0492 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
21 queries taking 0.0492 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.