October 01, 2006

HPD Modifies Illegal Immigrant Policy -- A Good First Step

Recognizing that the policy in place for fourteen years was flawed, the Houston Police Department has modified its handling of immigration issues.

Under fire in recent months over its policy toward illegal immigrants, the Houston Police Department is unveiling new procedures today to allow more cooperation with federal agents trying to catch criminals living in the country illegally.

Officers still will not inquire about the immigration status of people they haven't arrested, so the changes are unlikely to quiet critics who have labeled Houston a "sanctuary city" for illegal immigrants.

But the department is making several key revisions.

An announcement is expected today, less than two weeks after the shooting death of police officer Rodney Johnson caused simmering opposition to the department policy to flare anew. An illegal immigrant who previously had been deported is charged in the slaying.

Now what this means is that HPD won't go on ignoring violations of immigration laws, but will instead cooperate with federal authorities .

Among the changes to take effect this week:

•The department will hold people detained or arrested for traffic violations or other minor crimes — Class C misdemeanors — if warrant checks show they are wanted by federal agents for defying an order to leave the country or for returning after being deported in connection with a criminal case. Under existing policy, police generally did not hold such people for federal authorities, even if officers were aware of the federal warrants.

•The department will allow immigration agents unfettered access to the city's two jails, as they have had in the Harris County jail, and officers will start asking all arrestees whether they are citizens.

•Fingerprints of anyone booked into the jails without proper identification will be checked against a national fingerprint database. That could help officers identify wanted criminals, including people wanted for serious immigration violations, police say.

Now the policy does not go far enough, in my book. HPD officers should inquire about the immigration status of ALL individuals arrested or cited and then notify federal authorities of those here illegally. This is, however, a good start.

And for those who argue that immigration is a federal issue and that the local cops should not be involved in enforcing such laws, would you care to let us know what other federal laws you don't want cops enforcing?

Kidnapping?

Terrorism?

Drug trafficking?

Come on, surely there must be some other federal law besides the one against border jumping that you don't believe local cops should enforce.

And interestingly enough, the policy change was expedited by the murder of HPD Officer Rodney Johnson by a previously-deported, child-molesting, border-jumping immigration criminal.

The death of officer Rodney Johnson expedited the Houston Police Department's new policy of asking people arrested in minor crimes for identification and running criminal background checks on those who cannot provide it, but the change was being formulated before he was killed during the arrest of an illegal immigrant, Mayor Bill White said Sunday.

"That did provide an additional impetus to bring this to conclusion, but it was in the works anyway," White said at a news conference Sunday formally announcing the change. "Both Chief (Hurtt) and I, after that death, we asked for an expedited review of everything we could to identify people who are wanted (for criminal activity)."

I wonder -- will Houston city councilwoman Ada Edwards call Mayor White and Chief Hurtt "pimps" for making the change, as she did Councilwoman Shelley Sekula-Gibbs when the GOP congressional candidate courageously called for the policy's change on the day of Johnson's funeral?

Posted by: Greg at 10:19 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.

1 And they didnt even invite silly sekula gibbs to partake in the announcement.

I guess if they had a press conference at a gravesite, she would have been there.

Posted by: john cobarruvias at Mon Oct 2 08:37:29 2006 (gkZx4)

2 I guess you cannot tell the difference between a gravesite and the City Council chamber. Her comments, made during a city council meeting, were perfectly appropriate.

But then again, Ada Edwards was out selling herself for votes, like a whore after a crack rock.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Oct 2 09:37:21 2006 (E1re6)

3 I just thrilled they were able to "modify" their policy on immigration, I figured something would have to be changed because of the "big issue" of the suspect that shot Officer Johnson was an illegal immigrant. But explain to me how this is going to DIRECTLY stop an officer from being shot from the back of his police car.......A 3RD TIME. Sorry I am just a HPD wife that is just worried about my husband.

Posted by: Mrs Walker at Mon Oct 2 13:09:04 2006 (1tq2J)

4 If the police had checked his immigration status, and put him in the car, how would that have stopped him from shooting the police?

Maybe rhymes ought to join the police force and protect the citizens of this great city, like he did in Iraq.

Posted by: John cobarruvias at Mon Oct 2 13:53:26 2006 (QUcTr)

5 The reality is that there may have been no stopping this shooting -- but one has to ask what other encounters the killer had with cops prior to this when he could have been nabbed.

And John -- I hope you won't comment on issues related to medical care until you have gone to med school and become a doctor. Or on Wal-Mart until you have run a Fortune 500 company. Or on education until you have been a public school teacher. I presume you see from these examples how stupid your cheap-shot argument is -- but then again, if you could think logically you would be a Republican.

Posted by: Rhymes With right at Mon Oct 2 14:28:44 2006 (wfdL5)

6 To Mrs Walker,

I am sorry for you loss. The truth of the matter is the Houston Police Force needs to implement policy that will protect the officers first and foremost as they take a greater risk than any in our community. The problem we have currently is a Police Chief that is no more than a puppet to a bunch of politicians who don't stop grandstanding long enough to create policy that will protect legal citizens of Houston. The problem is we have elections coming up and too many are palying partisian games. We need policy to protect our officers, our citizens and legal guests of this country. If someone is here without checking in at a boarder then they should truly receive the bottom end of our resources.

The reality of our world though is that if the pedifile, boarder jumping fellon had pulled his gun and been shot by officer Johnson the story would have been wholly different. Every Hispanic rights group would be up in arms about this poor immigrant. I would tryly doubt that his own Police Chief would be in his corner because it is just not PC.

Posted by: Houston Expat at Mon Oct 2 19:28:44 2006 (v7HS7)

7 I can't believe this is even up for debate. I lived in Houston for over 25 years and never thought of it as liberal. It goes this far, "illegal alien". No further. They are here illegally, enough said. I don't care how they or the latino community feels. Our country was created from immigrants that did it right. They respected this country enough to come in legally, went through the hardships this entailed and assimilated into our country. They didn't demand anything but basic human rights, which they got. Our country can fill all of those jobs that illegals are filling now with US citizens.

Shame on the chief of police for not coming to this same conclusion. Go to Mexico and demand this stuff. See how far you get. Jeez!

Posted by: Dr. Cunningham at Tue Oct 3 01:16:50 2006 (MIB0K)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
13kb generated in CPU 0.0046, elapsed 0.0114 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0076 seconds, 36 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]