January 06, 2006

Microsoft Censors Chinese Dissident -- Shuts Down Blog

Want a legitimate reason to hate Microsoft? Try this one on for size.

Microsoft Corp. has shut down the Internet journal of a Chinese blogger that discussed politically sensitive issues including a recent strike at a Beijing newspaper.

The action came amid criticism by free-speech activists of foreign technology companies that help the communist government enforce censorship or silence dissent in order to be allowed into China's market.

Microsoft's China-based Web log-hosting service shut down the blog at the Chinese government's request, said Brooke Richardson, group product manager with Microsoft's MSN online division at the company headquarters in Redmond, Washington.

Though Beijing has supported Internet use for education and business, it fiercely polices content. Filters block objectionable foreign Web sites and regulations ban subversive and pornographic content and require service providers to enforce censorship rules.

"When we operate in markets around the world we have to ensure that our service complies with global laws as well as local laws and norms," Richardson said.

Which means, of course, that the company caters to the oppressive policies of the tyrranical Red Chinese government.

And also that they would have gladly cracked down on any German who dared hint at the evils of the Final Solution.

After all, Microsoft complies with all local laws and norms -- even those which are morally repugnant.

Posted by: Greg at 08:47 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 236 words, total size 2 kb.

1 If in your previous post you leave us w/ only 2 choices--either support Bush or al-Zawahiri--why can't it be asked of you, you must either support a free market that allows companies like Microsoft to committ such abominations or support a government-regulated market that would not allow Microsoft to help preserve a dictatorship?

Posted by: Dana Garrett at Fri Jan 6 17:32:37 2006 (E2eEY)

2 Oh, I support the free market, and am not suggesting that the government regulate the market in the manner you suggest.

Notice that I never argue that the US government should act against Microsoft -- and that I refer to the company's actions as morally repugnant. I suggest contempt (and, implicitly, private acts of defiance of Microsoft), not prosecution.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Jan 7 02:01:37 2006 (rtcyv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
6kb generated in CPU 0.0042, elapsed 0.0118 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0085 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]