January 25, 2009

Yet Another Liberal Redefines Dissent As Treason, Not patriotism, In Age Of Obama

This time it is un-funny faux intellectual Jon Stewart, who spent the last several years making money off of rooting for George W. Bush to fail.

So let's get this straight -- opposing Comrade Hope'N'Change and his moves toward socialism is "arguably treasonous", but engaging in 9/11Trutherism and hoping that anti-American terrorists defeat US troops in the field is patriotic. I don't know about you, but I'm sure confused, especially since I know what the Constitution says about treason.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Limbaugh has done nothing of the sort. Can the same be said of Code pink and much of the rest of the anti-war left?

H/T NewsBusters

Posted by: Greg at 12:49 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 2 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
5kb generated in CPU 0.0036, elapsed 0.0098 seconds.
19 queries taking 0.0075 seconds, 28 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]