July 22, 2007

How Far To Accommodate Religion?

I'm generally supportive of employers accommodating religious workers. And indeed, federal law requires it, provided that there is no undue burden placed upon the employer. An interesting test case on this issue vis-a-vis Islam may be coming out of Nebraska.

Supervisors at a meatpacking plant have fired or harassed dozens of Somali Muslim employees for trying to pray at sunset, violating civil rights laws, the workers and their advocates say.

The five- to 10-minute prayer, known as the maghrib, must be done within a 45-minute window around sunset, according to Muslim rules. The workers at the Swift & Co. plant in Grand Island say they quit, were fired or were verbally and physically harassed over the issue.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations has drafted a complaint to be filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The petition compiles testimony from at least 44 workers who had planned to sign the complaint during a meeting Sunday. The signing was changed to a later date because of a logistical problem.

Jama Mohamed, 28, said he was fired in June for leaving a production line to pray. Supervisors would not allow him a break, he said.

However, the problem seems to be that there are over 100 Muslim workers at the plant -- and accommodating them could present a significant burden for the employer.

Donald Selzer, an attorney for Greeley, Colo.-based Swift, said only three Somali workers were fired for reasons relating to the issue, and that it was for walking off the line without permission, not for praying.

Unscheduled breaks can force unplanned shutdowns of lines, Selzer said.

"That is a significant number of employees, and there is not much of a way to accommodate that consistent with keeping the production online," he said.

Which raises the obvious question -- is shutting down production an unreasonable burden for the employer? I think the answer is obvious.

Posted by: Greg at 11:43 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 325 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Oh, no. I mean come on, now!

What is "obvious" to you and to me won't be for the ACLU, CAIR, and the rest of those groups out there.

Here's the problem - and how it started: Give 'em an inch and they take a mile.

Nothing different than clerks at Target refusing to scan packages of bacon and taxi driver's refusing to transport people with alcohol. Did we see all of these problems before 9/11? I'm not recalling that we did, but then, I was working full-time like a hundred hours a week and now that I'm "retired" I have time to be on the Web learning about all of this now - and I didn't have the time then.

So, let's see, you give them 15 minutes at prayer time to do whatever it is they have to do, and next they'll want special footbaths, and before you know it, they'll want the entire six weeks off during which Ramadan is celebrated.

Can Swift go six weeks without workers on its production line? And how long will it be before they refuse to handle pork products in the production / assembly line position for which they were hired???

Good grief. Enough is enough. When will more people have the balls to say so!?!

Posted by: BT in SA at Mon Jul 23 08:06:15 2007 (8/kNN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.0048, elapsed 0.0106 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0073 seconds, 30 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]