June 06, 2007

Green Vatican?

Here is an interesting story from the Holy See.

Some Holy See buildings will start using solar energy, reflecting Pope Benedict XVI's concern about conserving the Earth's resources, a Vatican engineer said Tuesday. The roof of the Paul VI auditorium will be redone next year, with its cement panels replaced with photovoltaic cells to convert sunlight into electricity, engineer Pier Carlo Cuscianna said.

The 6,300-seat auditorium is used for the pontiff's general audiences on Wednesdays in winter and in bad weather during the rest of the year. Concerts in honor of pontiffs are also staged in the hall, with its sweeping stage.

The cells will produce enough electricity to illuminate, heat or cool the building, Cuscianna said.

"Since the auditorium isn't used every day, the (excess) energy will feed into the network providing (the Vatican) with power, so other Vatican offices can use the energy," he said.

You guys know I am not a believer in man-made global warming. I am, however, a believer in energy conservation and switching to renewable resources like solar and wind power for practical reasons. I therefore applaud the move that is being made, and hope that more nations, religious organizations, businesses, and individuals make efforts like this one.

Posted by: Greg at 02:37 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.

1 It's wonderful that the Vatican accepts the scientific evidence supporting man-enhanced global warming. 

Posted by: Dan at Wed Jun 6 14:42:52 2007 (IU21y)

2 You got a reading problem, Dan? The article talks about energy conservation, NOT global warming. It talks about the economic benefits, not global warming. Indeed, nowhere in the entire article are the words "global warming" used.

Gee, under your definition, I would qualify as a supporter of the cult of man-made global warming, simply because of my belief in renewable energy resources as beneficial to our society and planet.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Jun 6 15:33:57 2007 (s3l8i)

3 The reading problem is solely yours, RWR. It appears you believe people should only read what you post on this site. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Go ahead. Read a little more, and then you can come back and acknowledge that I am, again, correct.

Posted by: Dan at Wed Jun 6 23:07:20 2007 (IU21y)

4 Dan-- read the WaPo article in question.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Jun 7 04:12:33 2007 (tcVKW)

5 I did, but that's not all I read. You go read up on the Vatican's position on global warming, and you'll see that I am, again, correct.

Posted by: Dan at Thu Jun 7 04:40:29 2007 (n1xH/)

6 I looked, and cannot help but remind you that the Vatican was wrong on Galileo, too, when they supported teh scientific consensus of their day.

After all, the Pope is not infallible on matters of science.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Jun 7 05:19:17 2007 (tcVKW)

7 So, I was right about the Vatican's position, wasn't I?

Posted by: Dan at Thu Jun 7 11:17:12 2007 (IU21y)

8 At least that of some scientists associated with Vatican organizations -- I've not found anything that would argue that it is an official position of the Vatican, nor that it is binding upon the faithful.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Jun 7 11:33:32 2007 (kB0wx)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.007, elapsed 0.0588 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0532 seconds, 37 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]