July 25, 2006

Will The Left Call Them "Theocrats"?

Probably not, because they are a part of the Letist coalition. Therefore, whatever these religious leftists do is fine.

With a faith-based agenda of their own, liberal and progressive clergy from various denominations are lobbying lawmakers, holding rallies and publicizing their positions. They want to end the Iraq war, ease global warming, combat poverty, raise the minimum wage, revamp immigration laws, and prevent "immoral" cuts in federal social programs.

Some, like the Rev. Robin Meyers of the United Church of Christ in Oklahoma, marry gay couples and seek to reduce abortions while rejecting calls by the right to outlaw them.

"I join the ranks of those who are angry because I have watched as the faith I love has been taken over by fundamentalists who claim to speak for Jesus but whose actions are anything but Christian," declared Meyers, who has written a new book, "Why the Christian Right is Wrong.

According to scholars, the religious left has become its most active since the 1960s when the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and other clergy -- black and white -- were key figures in the civil-rights and anti-Vietnam war movements.

Yeah, that's right -- the Left has always welcomed religious support. It's only when people of faith oppose tehm that the liberals insist that their involvement in the policy-making process is illegitimate. So much for the intellectual honesty on their part.

So the next time you hear a Leftist attacking "theo-cons" for violating "separation of Church and State", find out if he is willing to denounce Rev. Robin Meyers or Rev. Jim Wallis.

Or better yet, perhaps you can ask him about repealing a certain federal holiday that honors a certain Baptist minister-- in the name of separation of Church and State, of course.

Posted by: Greg at 04:38 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.

1 They want to end the Iraq war, ease global warming, combat poverty, raise the minimum wage, revamp immigration laws, and prevent "immoral" cuts in federal social programs.

WWJD? He'd protect the Earth, stop war, help the poor and look at what it says on the Statue of Liberty. Where did YOUR family come from, btw?

Some, like the Rev. Robin Meyers of the United Church of Christ in Oklahoma, marry gay couples and seek to reduce abortions while rejecting calls by the right to outlaw them.
Okay, the gay marriage thing is against the law...but wouldn't reducing abortions be a good thing????

Posted by: flowerofhighrank at Tue Jul 25 20:55:42 2006 (B1qLe)

2 You seem to have deliberately missed my point -- haven't you.

I'm not out to discuss whose goal is correct -- I'm out to point out that thhe Left is rather selective when it comes to declaring the importation of religious views into politics illegitimate.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Tue Jul 25 23:50:14 2006 (+P0OE)

3 Yes, the left is very selective. It's the people who want their faith made the basis of the law, rather than those who are compelled by faith to speak out on various issue without making their faith the basis of law, that they have a problem with. It's not an insignificant difference.

Posted by: John at Wed Jul 26 06:51:39 2006 (YId1A)

4 Actually, it is a semantic difference that makes no difference. If I feel compelled to speak out by my faith and to participate in the political process to bring about change because of my faith, then presumably I am seeking to make policy consistent with my faith.

That is what the Religious Right does -- and that is what the Religious Left does. To claim otherwise is absurd.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Jul 26 07:30:23 2006 (K65dy)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0054, elapsed 0.0125 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0084 seconds, 33 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]