October 17, 2006

What Matters Most

Over the past 2 ½ years, I’ve given glimpses of my life to you. Probably the one thing that I’ve made most clear is that I am married o a woman I passionately love, and that I want to have as the center of my life for the rest of my life. You would also be aware that there are health issues in her life that are a source of great concern.

And for that reason, some changes are coming.

I plan on blogging a bit less – and I want to explain why.

IÂ’m up before sunup every morning, out the door by before dawn, and donÂ’t return home until for another 9-10 hours. I teach a night class that takes me out of my home several nights a week. That means my evenings with my wife are at a premium, especially since my return time is late enough that she will be asleep or ready for bed when I get home after class and so there is not any significant time to spend with her then.

And I look at how I have spent those evenings lately – including a bonus one last night, when torrential rains and flooding in the Houston area caused the cancellation of my night class – and I’m not happy.

I’ve spent them making replies to the Holocaust denying neo-Nazi troll who just won’t leave, despite my best efforts to rid my site of his filth. I’ve done the same with the filth-spewing “liberal” who can’t string three words together without one being a profane insult. I’ve made posts on my site and commented on others – and last night found myself doing battle with a thief who stole a photo off my site, among other things….

And then IÂ’ve spent what time is left with the woman that I love.

IÂ’ve been struggling with this issue for several days now, and driving in to school this morning, I found myself asking a basic question.

“What is your priority and why?”

And in one of those brutal epiphanies that are a part of life, I recognized that the answer I wanted to give wasnÂ’t well-reflected in my actions.

After all, this blog is simply not that important, but IÂ’ve let it become a driving force in my life to an extent that has ceased to be healthy. And IÂ’ve let it begin to take the place of what matters most in my life, allowing this hobby to become too time-consuming and too important.

And so I will be cutting back. I have to, for the sake of my own sanity and the happiness of the person I still want to spend the rest of my life with.

That will mean probably only one or two posts a day, and possibly days without any posts at all. It will mean putting the focus on the part of my life that really needs to be the priority – my wife, especially while she still enough has enough good days to balance out the bad ones that have slowly come to be more frequent over the last few months. I want to take those walks and long drives. I want to go shopping with her. I want to go out for a movie or dinner or take a romantic weekend away. And maybe I’d rather not have thoughts about possible posts, how to respond to commenters, and site traffic levels crowding out my attention to her when she needs it most.

In short, I need blogging to be less of a jealous and demanding mistress and more of a recreational diversion.

I hope folks will still come around. I hope people will still comment (well, maybe not KKKen or Nunya, but decent people), and maybe even link back to something that you like. But if the changes don’t meet with your approval, please know that I have appreciated your visits and wish you well – and hope you will still pop in from time to time.

And sweetheart, if you are reading this, know that IÂ’m sorry for too many evenings and weekends when IÂ’ve failed to give you your due. I know I canÂ’t make them up, but I can strive to do better.

Posted by: Greg at 05:44 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 715 words, total size 4 kb.

1

This is an excellent post. You are getting your priorities in order,as America should. Family comes first just as protecting America's national interests should be prioritized over those of Israel and over US empire in general.


Just as you are "coming home," America should get its troops out of Iraq TEN MORE KILLED IN ONE DAY ,IN A NO-WIN WAR and put some on the Rio Grande where the real threat is.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Oct 18 07:12:32 2006 (P95FD)

2 KKKen, I'm sure you would have made the same argument about Europe on D-Day, or about the island-hopping campaign that included many hellish days at places like Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

For that matter, i suspect you would ahve advised Linclon to sue for peace during some of the darker days of the Civil War -- arguing, of course, that the expenditure of white blood in an effort to free the slaves was an affront to the values our nation was founded upon.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Oct 18 07:45:16 2006 (63AdF)

3

http://www.juancole.com/2006/10/year-one-of-empire-bush-resistance-is.html


 


I assume you will condemn the terror legislation outlined here, resembling Lincoln's habeus corpus. "The Real Lincoln," a fairly new biography by DiLorenzo elaborates on the latter but the former is our immediate concern.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Oct 18 12:30:43 2006 (+6sav)

Posted by: Ken Hoop at Wed Oct 18 12:47:51 2006 (+6sav)

5 Good grief, KKKen -- take a hint.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Oct 18 12:57:04 2006 (4rUAi)

6 And no, I won't -- especially because this follows teh constitutional procedure for suspending habeas corpus by involving Congress.

Besides, combattants have never had habeas rights in US courts in the past -- and may be detained until the end of the conflict under terms of the Geneva Conventions.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Wed Oct 18 13:00:58 2006 (4rUAi)

7

Rationale for a police state overseeing an interminable undeclared "war," with Congressional abrogation of a kind about which I'm sure Ron Paul (R Texas) will be happy to enlighten you.


 


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Thu Oct 19 06:24:11 2006 (DZbll)

8 So now the Geneva Conventions violate international law and the US Constitution? And here I thought the Supremes just said they were international law and overrode the Constitution.

Incredible!

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Oct 19 10:21:24 2006 (uXfhz)

Posted by: Ken Hoop at Thu Oct 19 12:50:28 2006 (DZbll)

10 What a crappy article -- first it argues that the suspension of habeas corpus is "unprecedented", then it talks about the other time in US history it was done -- by Lincoln, without Congressional approval.

I suppose, though, that this will mean that the Supreme Court is going to have to rule on whether Congress and the President can exercise a power explicitly granted them by the US Constitution -- or will we get a new case in which by a 5-4 vote the Supreme Court amends the Constitution by judicial fiat despite the clear wording of the text of teh document.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Thu Oct 19 16:26:49 2006 (SaOaN)

Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Oct 20 09:32:08 2006 (P95FD)

12 Well, KKKen, anyone who gives any credibility to Juan Cole pretty clearly has an anti-Israel/anti-Semitic agenda.

Don't you have a synagogue to vandalize or a cross to burn, you pig?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Oct 20 10:18:18 2006 (0jJSk)

13

"Pig?"...hey, I'm not a Moslem....or overweight like some educator/bloggers. Don't torch any mosques down your way, if you limber up.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Oct 21 05:12:00 2006 (EPkr9)

14 Actually, KKKen, I apologize for that insult -- to swine.

And trust me, i don't commit acts of violence against my opponents, either of a political or religious variety (though i do advocate appropriate action against enemies of our nation by our government).

On the other hand. Klan/Nazi types are renowned for such acts of violence.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Oct 21 06:27:32 2006 (Us9kK)

15 So are "liberal democracy" types--Dresden, Horoshima, Nagasaki...

Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Oct 21 09:34:16 2006 (EPkr9)

16 Interesting you should mention those -- three attacks in a war begun by your fellow fascists, KKKen. I guess you don't believe that those you hate America, UK, other western democracies) should have responded to the Axis aggression. They should have spread their legs and accepted the aggression.

Hmmmm... maybe that explains how your mom got knocked up with scum like you. God knows that if your father held views like yours there would not be a Christian woman who would give herself over to him voluntarily -- so was it rape or prostitution?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Oct 21 12:27:28 2006 (oJaSu)

17

Maybe your accident was karma, portly pouter. The British historian AJP Taylor outlined how the culpability for the second world war was equally spread among Allies and Axis Powers in his "Origins of World War Two."


 


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Oct 22 12:26:08 2006 (dold7)

18

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.J.P._Taylor


att.to "Second World War" controversy section, and I use an anti-Nazi source who tells much truth.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sun Oct 22 12:29:00 2006 (dold7)

19 Well, KKKen, I know you will accept any apologist for Hitler, regardless of their politics. I'm therefore not surprised by your citation of this source who is generally rejected by scholars in most regards.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sun Oct 22 13:46:28 2006 (j0QmT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0088, elapsed 0.0213 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0145 seconds, 48 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]