September 27, 2006

Time To Neuter the Terrorstinian Anarchy?

If this is the sentiment at work in the West Bank and Gaza, it might be time to admit that the Israeli policy of permitting Palestinian self-rule is a favor, and that the expulsion of Palestinian Arabs (a policy implemented by virtually every Arab country towards their Jews in 194 is the only moral and rational option.

Following the recent Israeli-Hizballah war in Lebanon, a majority of Palestinians say they should follow Hizballah's example and launch rockets into Israeli cities, a new poll showed.

Hizballah launched more than 4,000 rockets into Israel killing dozens of Israelis and causing extensive damage throughout northern Israel during the 34-day war in July and August.

According to the results of a survey conducted by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), 63 percent of the Palestinians surveyed agreed that they should emulate Hizballah's methods by launching rockets at Israeli cities while 35 percent of Palestinians disagreed.

A majority of Palestinians also supported Hizballah in July 2000 following Israel's unilateral troop withdrawal from southern Lebanon. At the time, Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah boasted that his group had done what no Arab nation in the last 50 years had done: defeat Israel. He encouraged the Palestinians to follow in his footsteps.

Five months after Israel's troop withdrawal from Lebanon, the Palestinians launched their intifadah uprising, which has turned into a five-year terror campaign targeting Israeli cities as well as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The new poll showed that about 57 percent of Palestinians support the idea of using suicide bombings and shooting attacks against Israelis.

There may, however, be a glimmer of hope.

But at the same time, about three-quarters of Palestinians supported the call for an Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire, and 74 percent said they believe that Palestinians cannot depend on violent actions only but must reach a political agreement with Israel.

So a majority wants a political settlement with Israel – but there remains the problem that many of them want it achieved through terror attacks on the Jewish state. That is not acceptable. It also will not succeed.

Posted by: Greg at 12:42 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.

1

Every Palestinian who has deeds to property vacated by expulsion in 1948 and who wishes to return to his or her homeland, should be permitted return, after which a general plebiscite should be held deciding what form of government should reside over the entire area in question.


If the majority favor Zionism, so be it. If a democracy with equal rights for all, so be it.


This is the only possible peaceful  denoument of the conflict but the siteowner theoretically prefers ethnic cleansing, given a choice.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 29 04:41:52 2006 (7GYBH)

2 KKKen, you have it backwards -- the Arabs expelled the Jews, not the other way around.

The Jews of Israel responded by compensateing their dispossessed bretheren and giving them citizenship.

On the other hand, the Arabs who voluntarily left their homes were ignored by their Arab bretheren and allowed to rot in refugee camps for generations.

Let the Arabs care for teh Arabs -- and Israel remain a homeland for the Jews.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Sep 29 10:06:47 2006 (Wl5fp)

3 http://www.palestine-encyclopedia.com/EPP/TheAuthor.htm


YOU have it backwards,as the definitive "Encyclopedia of the Palestinian Problem" outlines. Basic primer recommended for
the indoctrinated American.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at Fri Sep 29 10:36:43 2006 (7GYBH)

4 Listen, KKKen -- you are the same guy who denies the Final Solution, so your track record on any issue related to the Jews is suspect. Indeed, you have called for genocide against the "kikes" (a word you are not willing to use here, but do in emails) more than once. You have also recommended Holocaust denial literature as the "definitive" primer for understanding the Holocaust.

The source you cite is by one more Terrorstinian official. it is no more worthy of consideration than the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (which I suspect you believe to be true, despite its having been documented to be a forgery).

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Fri Sep 29 12:07:50 2006 (Wl5fp)

5

It's just like you to bear false witness against as many Christians you claim to call "fellows' as you can when they take your beloved Israel off the pedastal.


I leave it to any of the inquisitive and objective to read this Palestinian CHRISTIAN'S tome and decide whether an intellect of his quality deserves the "terrorsitan" appellation


And  of course you can't produce one  example of myself calling for "genocide" against any group in either private or public writing. However to fervid  "Jews must rebuild the Temple for Jesus to come again" cultists like you, calling for a peaceful plebiscite is tantamount to calling for genocide.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Sat Sep 30 07:16:04 2006 (5j8Ij)

6 KKKen -- you have repeatedly called for the Jews to be removed from Israel. As that will not happen without your beloved Islamist jihadis of Hezbollah and Hamas (who you call secret warriors for Christ) spilling the blood of every man, woman, and child in the Jewish state.

But then again, you are a Klan-supporting, Holocaust-denying, Christian Identity-worshipping, Neo-Nazi skinhead wannabe who repeatedly sent me anti-Semitic material until i insisted you stop writing me. You are simply pathetic.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Sat Sep 30 14:35:21 2006 (3Gquf)

7

I have always deferred to the Palestinians to decide these matters, as I am not an interventionist Wilsonian liberal like the neocons. Thus I would never have called for the "Jews to be removed from Israel."


It was always PLO policy, in fact, that Jews who had immediate family living in Palestine in the pre-1948 era and were not part of the influx after, could be allowed to remain in a non-Zionist state.


And of course your repeated Christian Identity label conflicts with neo-Nazi, in turn conflicting with Klan ideology, and proves you love to heap on epithets which worked in pre-1990 America but do so no longer, the accuser being immediately suspect of America-endangering "Israel-first" politics.


Posted by: Ken Hoop at Mon Oct 2 10:32:48 2006 (DZbll)

8 Gee, KKKen -- sounds remarkably similar to what Hitler implemented in Germany in the 1930s.  That was how he started dealing with the "Jewish Question" -- by deporting all the foreign Jews before killing the native ones.

Of course, he then went after the neighboring countries and killed their Jews as well -- toting up 6 million along with anothe 6 million Gentiles.

And I connect you with all three groups because you have sent me literature from individuals who are part of each of them, praising them for their ideology.

By the way -- if you think I am an uncritical supporter of Israel who places the needs of that nation above those of the US, think again (or in your case, think a first time) -- go to the search box above and Google the name Johathan Pollard.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Oct 2 11:08:30 2006 (cZkcw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
12kb generated in CPU 0.0055, elapsed 0.0141 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0102 seconds, 37 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]