January 31, 2006

The Logic Is Beyond Dispute

Or at least it is if you accept the Islamist version of the Brezhnev Doctrine, namely that any territory once under the political and military control of Islam must be forever regarded as Islamic territory. So why not return Spain?

The children's website Al Fateh, property of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, demands in its most recent issue the return of the Spanish city of Seville to the "lost paradise" of Al Andalus, as the Muslim part of Spain was called during its existence between 711 and 1492. The web magazine, whose name means "conqueror," says it is for "the young builders of the future."

That is the argument for refusing to accept the existance of Israel -- why should the existance of Spain be any more acceptable to the Islamofascists?

Posted by: Greg at 01:59 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.

1 "JUST" WARS & DOUBLE-TONGUED DEMOCRATS

On May 2, 2003 Pope Benedict XVI, as Cardinal Ratzinger, (Head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) stated: “He (John Paul II) did not impose this position ('Iraq War not necessary') as doctrine of the Church but as the appeal of a conscience enlightened by faith” (Zenit News Agency). Unlike many U.S. Democrats, Pope John Paul's thoughts on the Iraq War were not voiced in an arrogant, judgmental manner. He loved America, and praised President George W. Bush's moral leadership (Zenit News - June 4, 2004).

Pope John Paul II never praised President Clinton for his "moral values," because Clinton, along with most Democrats, believes you have the "right to kill" through an abortion - a horrible crime against humanity that has resulted in the cruel deaths of millions of innocent, defenseless, unborn human beings. Cardinal Ratzinger later confirmed: "There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion, even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia" (Italian magazine "L'espresso," June 2004).

Would Pope John Paul II have considered it a "Just War" if France, England, and the U.S. had disarmed Germany, preventing Hitler from invading Poland and other countries? The vast majority of Americans agreed with President George W. Bush's decision to disarm Iraq, and eliminate their capacity to wage war when it was thought Iraq was developing biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons that could be used against America, and other nations. Aided by the Democratic Party, the House and Senate overwhelmingly approved the Iraq War Resolution.

On Feb. 17, 1998 President Clinton stated: "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton also believed that Saddam Hussein had biological, chemical, and nuclear programs in place. If President Bush is a "liar," why aren’t double-tongued Democrats held accountable? Do they think faulty intelligence on Iraq only came through Bush? They originally got it from Bill Clinton. The point made here is that hypocritical, immoral, lying Democrats want it both ways - they supported the Iraq War Resolution, but also want to place the blame for going to war on President Bush.

Vincent Bemowski - Writer (U.S. Politics & World Affairs)

Posted by: Vincent Bemowski at Tue Jan 31 16:32:58 2006 (WabSo)

2 Vince, my man, of all the places you want to post nonsense like this, anything referrring to "logic" should go to the bottom of your list.

Posted by: Dan at Wed Feb 1 02:51:30 2006 (y9xzG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
8kb generated in CPU 0.0035, elapsed 0.0105 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0079 seconds, 31 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]