June 18, 2006

Star Trekking!

I'll admit it -- I am a science fiction fanatic. When I'm not reading scholarly historical works, I'm found carrying a science fiction novel of some sort -- my latest discovery being Charles Stross and his Merchant Princes series (which I have devoured over the last two weeks along with a couple of Andre Norton's Earthsea novels).

And yes, I love Star Trek -- but I don't know that my love goes quite this far.

Paul Sieber was wearing a "Star Trek" uniform in the deep Virginia woods when he found himself surrounded by a leathery-looking gang.

Fortunately, the ruffians were dressed up as Klingons, and Mr. Sieber, with a cigarette dangling from his mouth, was preparing to film them with a $6,000 digital video camera. At times like this, Mr. Sieber, the writer and director of "Starship Farragut," must come to grips with the obvious — not all Klingons are trained actors — and bellow, "Quiet on the set!"

From these Virginia woods to the Scottish Highlands, "Star Trek" fans are filling the void left by a galaxy that has lost "Star Trek." For the first time in nearly two decades, television spinoffs from the original 1960's "Star Trek" series have ended, so fans are banding together to make their own episodes.

Fan films have been around for years, particularly those related to the "Star Wars" movies. But now they can be downloaded from the Web, and modern computer graphics technology has lent them surprising special effects. And as long as no one is profiting from the work, Paramount, which owns the rights to "Star Trek," has been tolerant. (Its executives declined to comment.)

Fan fiction has been around for a long time. Some authors have encouraged it -- even anthologized the best of it. But the development of computer technology has made it possible to make technically good video fan fiction and the internet has made its distribution quite easy. The NY Times article lists no fewer than five different groups making their own Star Trek episodes -- and tells us that there may be as many as two-dozen around the world, creating Star Trek apocrypha in a multiplicity of languages.

One has to ask, though, what such devotion and activity will mean for the future of Star Trek on television and in theaters, as well as the future of video entertainment as a whole. Do these niche productions signal where "Big Media" should go? Or is it the detritus left behind after the networks have moved on?

Or is it simply a throwback to a more innocent time, as science fiction has grown darker and less escapist over the decades?

Posted by: Greg at 10:38 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 447 words, total size 4 kb.

1 If I may make a suggestion for your reading list?

David Weber (Honor Harrington), John Ringo (March Upcontry, etc), John Scalzi (Old Man's War), Ben Bova (Grand Tour, Asteroid Wars), S.M. Stirling (The Sky People), John Varley (Red Lightning, Red Thunder, Steel Beach), Walter Jon Williams (Dread Empire's Fall), James P. Hogan (Giants series), Robert J. Sawyer (Neaderthal Parallax), Ian Douglas (Heritage Trilogy), H. Beam Piper, Michael Z. Williamson (Freehold, The Weapon)

Just a few to get you going...

Posted by: Ryan at Mon Jun 19 11:24:57 2006 (2wfEd)

2 I've read the Sawyer trilogy, and absolutely loved it. Might I recomment Stirling's Conquistadors?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at Mon Jun 19 12:02:03 2006 (L2LQz)

3 Ah, see...I've read all of Stirling's works, starting with 'Drakon' and then moving swiftly onto all of his Draka books (missed 'em first time around) and right into the 'Nantucket' series.

By the way, the first few chapters of his upcoming books are available on his website: http://hem.bredband.net/b108107/stirling/smstirling.html

Posted by: Ryan at Mon Jun 19 12:39:44 2006 (2wfEd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
9kb generated in CPU 0.0075, elapsed 0.0133 seconds.
21 queries taking 0.0091 seconds, 32 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
[/posts]